Seo Ganghyeon, Choi Hyo Geun, Jang Sookyung, Choi Sun, Lee Sa Ra, Park Su-Kyoung
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University, College of Medicine, 1, Singil-ro, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul 07441, Korea.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hallym Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University, College of Medicine, 22, Gwanpyeong-ro 170beon-gil, Dongan-gu, Anyang 14068, Korea.
J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 29;10(13):2923. doi: 10.3390/jcm10132923.
It is known that neonates born by cesarean delivery (CD) may have higher referral rates than those born by vaginal delivery (VD) for newborn hearing screening (NHS). False-positive NHS results can increase costs and parental anxiety. This study analyzed the differences in NHS referral rates according to delivery methods in Level I, II, and III neonatal care units. A retrospective chart review was done for 2322 infants (4644 ears) with delivery records who underwent NHS between 2004 and 2017. The first NHS was performed immediately before discharge when the infant was in good condition via the automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) or automated otoacoustic emissions (AOAE). There were 98 neonates (196 ears) who underwent both AABR and AOAE simultaneously as the first NHS, 30 of which failed. We used a total of 4810 ears in this analysis. Of all enrolled ears, 2075 ears were of neonates born by CD, and 2735 ears were of neonates born by VD. A total of 2460 ears were from patients in Level III neonatal intensive care units (NICU) and 2350 ears were from Level I and II neonatal care units. The overall referral rate was higher in infants born via CD (4.5%) than VD (3.2%). In Level I and II neonatal intensive care units, the referral rate was significantly higher in those born via CD (3.0%) than via VD (1.4%). Further, based on the screening method, AABR (75.8%) was more frequently used than AOAE (24.2%), thereby revealing AABR's higher referral rate in CD (2.9%) than in VD (1.2%). The referral rate of infants who underwent the NHS within three days of birth was higher in the CD group (3.0%) than in the VD group (1.3%). There was no significant difference in the referral rate depending on the delivery method when infants were hospitalized for more than four days or hospitalized in the NICU. The referral rate according to the delivery methods was significantly higher when the NHS test was performed for healthy newborns in the Level I and II neonatal care units born by CD within 72 h using AABR. Therefore, we recommend that the hearing screening test for newborns delivered by cesarean section be performed after 72 h of age. The results of this study may reduce the false-positive NHS results, unnecessary further tests, and parental anxiety.
众所周知,剖宫产(CD)出生的新生儿在新生儿听力筛查(NHS)中的转诊率可能高于阴道分娩(VD)出生的新生儿。NHS假阳性结果会增加成本并加重家长焦虑。本研究分析了I、II和III级新生儿护理单位中根据分娩方式划分的NHS转诊率差异。对2004年至2017年间接受NHS且有分娩记录的2322名婴儿(4644只耳)进行了回顾性病历审查。首次NHS在婴儿状况良好时于出院前通过自动听性脑干反应(AABR)或自动耳声发射(AOAE)进行。有98名新生儿(196只耳)同时接受AABR和AOAE作为首次NHS,其中30只耳未通过。本分析共使用4810只耳。在所有纳入的耳中,2075只耳来自剖宫产出生的新生儿,2735只耳来自阴道分娩出生的新生儿。共有2460只耳来自III级新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)的患者,2350只耳来自I级和II级新生儿护理单位。剖宫产出生的婴儿总体转诊率(4.5%)高于阴道分娩(3.2%)。在I级和II级新生儿重症监护病房,剖宫产出生者的转诊率(3.0%)显著高于阴道分娩者(1.4%)。此外,基于筛查方法,AABR(75.8%)的使用频率高于AOAE(24.2%),从而显示AABR在剖宫产中的转诊率(2.9%)高于阴道分娩(1.2%)。出生后三天内接受NHS的婴儿中,剖宫产组的转诊率(3.0%)高于阴道分娩组(1.3%)。当婴儿住院超过四天或在NICU住院时,转诊率根据分娩方式无显著差异。在I级和II级新生儿护理单位中,对剖宫产出生的健康新生儿在72小时内使用AABR进行NHS检测时,根据分娩方式的转诊率显著更高。因此,我们建议剖宫产出生的新生儿听力筛查测试在72小时龄后进行。本研究结果可能会减少NHS假阳性结果、不必要的进一步检测以及家长焦虑。