• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经剖宫产分娩和首次耳声发射听力测试失败。

Birth by cesarean delivery and failure on first otoacoustic emissions hearing test.

机构信息

Department of Neonatology, Meyer Children’s Hospital, Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2012 Jul;130(1):e95-100. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3179. Epub 2012 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1542/peds.2011-3179
PMID:22689871
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neonatal hearing screening occasionally fails. We noticed that infants born by cesarean delivery (CD) appeared to fail the first otoacoustic emissions (OAE) test more frequently than infants delivered vaginally (VD). This might increase maternal anxiety. We aimed to evaluate the influence of mode of delivery on failure to pass the first OAE.

METHODS

Overall, 1653 infants of >35 weeks' gestation were evaluated. OAE was performed before discharge. Perinatal-neonatal variables and results of OAE were recorded retrospectively.

RESULTS

Compared with VD infants, CD infants had lower gestational age and 1-minute Apgar, more small for gestational age (SGA), and earlier age at first OAE. Univariate analysis: CD, male gender, gestational age 35 to 37 weeks, birth weight ≤ 2500 g, SGA, and younger age at first OAE were significantly associated with failed first OAE. In infants weighing 2501 to 4000 g, CD infants had 3-fold higher rates of failed first OAE in comparison with VD infants (20.7% vs 7.1%) before 48 hours of age. In the multivariate analysis, variables independently significantly associated with failed first OAE were male gender (odds ratio [OR] 1.42 [1.02-1.98]), CD (emergency CD: OR 3.18 [2.21-4.57], elective CD: OR 3.32 [2.04-5.42]), age 12 to 23 hours at first OAE (OR 3.1 [2.1-4.58]) and SGA (OR 2.2 [1.15-4.28]).

CONCLUSIONS

CD infants had significantly higher failure rates on first OAE. We speculate that CD is accompanied by retained fluid in middle ear which may impair neonatal hearing. The timing of first OAE after CD should preferably be postponed beyond 48 hours of age to improve OAE passage and minimize maternal anxiety and costs.

摘要

背景

新生儿听力筛查偶尔会失败。我们注意到,剖宫产(CD)分娩的婴儿似乎比阴道分娩(VD)的婴儿更频繁地未能通过第一次耳声发射(OAE)测试,这可能会增加产妇的焦虑。我们旨在评估分娩方式对首次 OAE 未通过的影响。

方法

共有 1653 名>35 周妊娠的婴儿接受了评估。OAE 在出院前进行。回顾性记录围产期-新生儿变量和 OAE 结果。

结果

与 VD 婴儿相比,CD 婴儿的胎龄和 1 分钟 Apgar 较低,较小的胎龄(SGA)比例较高,首次 OAE 的年龄较早。单因素分析:CD、男性、胎龄 35 至 37 周、出生体重≤2500g、SGA 和首次 OAE 年龄较小与首次 OAE 失败显著相关。在体重为 2501 至 4000g 的婴儿中,与 VD 婴儿相比,CD 婴儿在<48 小时时首次 OAE 失败的发生率高 3 倍(20.7%对 7.1%)。在多因素分析中,与首次 OAE 失败显著相关的变量为男性(比值比[OR]1.42[1.02-1.98])、CD(紧急 CD:OR 3.18[2.21-4.57],择期 CD:OR 3.32[2.04-5.42])、首次 OAE 年龄为 12 至 23 小时(OR 3.1[2.1-4.58])和 SGA(OR 2.2[1.15-4.28])。

结论

CD 婴儿首次 OAE 失败率明显较高。我们推测 CD 伴有中耳积液,可能会损害新生儿听力。CD 后首次 OAE 的最佳时间应推迟至>48 小时,以提高 OAE 通过率,并最大程度地减少产妇焦虑和成本。

相似文献

1
Birth by cesarean delivery and failure on first otoacoustic emissions hearing test.经剖宫产分娩和首次耳声发射听力测试失败。
Pediatrics. 2012 Jul;130(1):e95-100. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3179. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
2
[The effect of maternal medications, hypertension/pre-eclamptic toxemia and diabetes mellitus on neonatal hearing screening].[母亲用药、高血压/子痫前期及糖尿病对新生儿听力筛查的影响]
Harefuah. 2014 Sep;153(9):511-4, 560.
3
Association between mode of delivery and failure of neonatal acoustic emission test: a retrospective analysis.分娩方式与新生儿听觉发射测试失败之间的关联:一项回顾性分析。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Apr;79(4):516-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.01.019. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
4
Impact of gestational age on neonatal hearing screening in vaginally-born late-preterm and early-term infants.足月产阴道分娩的晚期早产儿和极早产儿的胎龄对新生儿听力筛查的影响。
Neonatology. 2013;104(2):110-5. doi: 10.1159/000350554. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
5
Delayed first otoacoustic emissions test decreases failure on neonatal hearing screening after caesarean delivery.剖宫产新生儿听力筛查中延迟初次耳声发射测试可降低其漏筛率。
Acta Paediatr. 2013 May;102(5):e194-9. doi: 10.1111/apa.12175. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
6
A multicenter evaluation of how many infants with permanent hearing loss pass a two-stage otoacoustic emissions/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol.一项关于有多少永久性听力损失婴儿通过两阶段耳声发射/自动听性脑干反应新生儿听力筛查方案的多中心评估。
Pediatrics. 2005 Sep;116(3):663-72. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1688.
7
Otoacoustic emission screen results in critically ill neonates who received gentamicin in the first week of life.在出生后第一周接受庆大霉素治疗的危重新生儿中,行耳声发射筛查。
Pharmacotherapy. 2011 Jul;31(7):649-57. doi: 10.1592/phco.31.7.649.
8
Test-retest reliability of wideband reflectance measures in infants under screening and diagnostic test conditions.在筛查和诊断测试条件下,婴儿宽带反射率测量的重测信度。
Ear Hear. 2007 Sep;28(5):669-81. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31812f71b1.
9
A multisite study to examine the efficacy of the otoacoustic emission/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol: research design and results of the study.一项多中心研究,旨在检验耳声发射/自动听性脑干反应新生儿听力筛查方案的有效性:研究设计与研究结果
Am J Audiol. 2005 Dec;14(2):S186-199. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2005/021).
10
Newborn hearing screening by transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: analysis of response as a function of risk factors.通过瞬态诱发耳声发射进行新生儿听力筛查:作为危险因素函数的反应分析
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2003 Feb;23(1):16-20.

引用本文的文献

1
Targeting risk factors for false-positive outcomes in newborn hearing screening: a focus on mode of delivery - a case-control study.针对新生儿听力筛查中假阳性结果的风险因素:以分娩方式为重点——一项病例对照研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Apr 30. doi: 10.1007/s00405-025-09428-3.
2
Referral rate and false-positive rates in a hearing screening program among high-risk newborns.高危新生儿听力筛查项目中的转诊率和假阳性率。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Oct;280(10):4455-4465. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-07978-y. Epub 2023 May 8.
3
Neonatal Screening for Congenital Hearing Loss in the North of Jordan; Findings and Implications.
约旦北部先天性听力损失的新生儿筛查:结果与启示
Int J Prev Med. 2021 Dec 1;12:162. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_383_20. eCollection 2021.
4
Delivery Route and the Outcome of Newborn Hearing Screening of Full-Term Neonates Born in a Public Maternal-Infant Hospital in the South of Brazil.巴西南部一家公立母婴医院足月新生儿的听力筛查分娩途径及结果
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Jul;25(3):e365-e373. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714146. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
5
Analysis of the Referral Rates of Newborn Hearing Screening Test According to Childbirth Delivery Methods in Neonatal Care Units.新生儿护理单位中按分娩方式分析新生儿听力筛查测试的转诊率
J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 29;10(13):2923. doi: 10.3390/jcm10132923.
6
The effects of mode of delivery, maternal age, birth weight, gender and family history on screening hearing results: A cross sectional study.分娩方式、产妇年龄、出生体重、性别及家族史对听力筛查结果的影响:一项横断面研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Mar 26;64:102236. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102236. eCollection 2021 Apr.
7
Perinatal factors influencing the neonatal hearing screening results.围生期因素对新生儿听力筛查结果的影响。
BMC Pediatr. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02476-0.
8
The Effect of Mode of Delivery on Newborn Hearing Screening Results.分娩方式对新生儿听力筛查结果的影响。
Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Mar;57(1):19-23. doi: 10.5152/tao.2019.3940. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
9
The Effect of Mode of Delivery and Hospital Type on Newborn Hearing Screening Results Using Otoacoustic Emissions: Based on Screening Age.分娩方式和医院类型对使用耳声发射进行新生儿听力筛查结果的影响:基于筛查年龄
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Mar;69(1):1-5. doi: 10.1007/s12070-016-0967-3. Epub 2016 Feb 22.