• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分娩方式对新生儿听力筛查结果的影响。

The Effect of Mode of Delivery on Newborn Hearing Screening Results.

作者信息

Güven Selis Gülseven

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Trakya University School of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey.

出版信息

Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Mar;57(1):19-23. doi: 10.5152/tao.2019.3940. Epub 2019 Mar 1.

DOI:10.5152/tao.2019.3940
PMID:31049248
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6461335/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Congenital hearing loss is one of the most important public health problems with a frequency of about 1-6 per 1000 live births all over the world. Although neonatal hearing screening tests are important for the timely detection and rehabilitation of hearing loss, determining the factors that may affect the screening results will contribute greatly to the development of screening programs. In this study, the effects of the modes of delivery on the results of tests in the screening program was investigated.

METHODS

In this study, the results of 10.575 newborns who were screened according to the National Neonatal Hearing Screening Protocol between January 2013 and May 2017 were evaluated. The screening test results of 2.653 newborns were examined retrospectively according to the type of delivery after candidates were excluded according to the exclusion criteria and risk factors for hearing loss. Of these newborns, 1.571 (59.2%) were born by normal delivery and 1.082 (40.8%) by cesarean section. Screening test results were analyzed using Pearson's Chi-square test.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was observed among the 2.653 neonatal hearing screening test results in terms of mode of delivery (p>0.05). In both delivery modes, the rate of false positive was found to be high (81.9%) in the first hearing screening test of newborns, and this rate decreased in the second screening test (14.5%).

CONCLUSION

The mode of delivery has no significant effect on the neonatal hearing screening results; however, the observation that neonates had been more successful in the second screening test in both groups suggests that the test protocol should be re-evaluated in terms of timing.

摘要

目的

先天性听力损失是最重要的公共卫生问题之一,全球活产儿中其发生率约为每1000例中有1 - 6例。尽管新生儿听力筛查测试对于听力损失的及时发现和康复很重要,但确定可能影响筛查结果的因素将极大地有助于筛查项目的开展。本研究调查了分娩方式对筛查项目中测试结果的影响。

方法

本研究评估了2013年1月至2017年5月期间按照国家新生儿听力筛查方案进行筛查的10575名新生儿的结果。在根据听力损失的排除标准和危险因素排除候选对象后,回顾性检查了2653名新生儿的筛查测试结果。这些新生儿中,1571名(59.2%)通过顺产出生,1082名(40.8%)通过剖宫产出生。使用Pearson卡方检验分析筛查测试结果。

结果

在2653例新生儿听力筛查测试结果中,未观察到分娩方式方面有统计学显著差异(p>0.05)。在两种分娩方式中,新生儿首次听力筛查测试的假阳性率均较高(81.9%),而在第二次筛查测试中该比率有所下降(14.5%)。

结论

分娩方式对新生儿听力筛查结果无显著影响;然而,两组新生儿在第二次筛查测试中表现更佳这一观察结果表明,应从时间安排方面重新评估测试方案。

相似文献

1
The Effect of Mode of Delivery on Newborn Hearing Screening Results.分娩方式对新生儿听力筛查结果的影响。
Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Mar;57(1):19-23. doi: 10.5152/tao.2019.3940. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
2
Early detection of neonatal hearing loss by otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem response over 10 years of experience.通过耳声发射和听性脑干反应早期检测新生儿听力损失:超过10年的经验
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Dec;127:109647. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109647. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
3
The Colorado newborn hearing screening project, 1992-1999: on the threshold of effective population-based universal newborn hearing screening.科罗拉多州新生儿听力筛查项目,1992 - 1999年:迈向基于人群的有效普遍新生儿听力筛查的开端
Pediatrics. 2002 Jan;109(1):E7. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.1.e7.
4
Analysis of the Referral Rates of Newborn Hearing Screening Test According to Childbirth Delivery Methods in Neonatal Care Units.新生儿护理单位中按分娩方式分析新生儿听力筛查测试的转诊率
J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 29;10(13):2923. doi: 10.3390/jcm10132923.
5
Newborn hearing screening: effectiveness, importance of high-risk factors, and characteristics of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit and well-baby nursery.新生儿听力筛查:有效性、高危因素的重要性以及新生儿重症监护病房和健康婴儿护理室中婴儿的特征
Otol Neurotol. 2005 Nov;26(6):1186-90. doi: 10.1097/01.mao.0000184602.94677.41.
6
Our newborn hearing screening results.我们的新生儿听力筛查结果。
North Clin Istanb. 2021 Mar 12;8(2):167-171. doi: 10.14744/nci.2021.30806. eCollection 2021.
7
Newborn hearing screening: the great omission.新生儿听力筛查:重大遗漏。
Pediatrics. 1998 Jan;101(1):E4. doi: 10.1542/peds.101.1.e4.
8
Newborn hearing screening by transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: analysis of response as a function of risk factors.通过瞬态诱发耳声发射进行新生儿听力筛查:作为危险因素函数的反应分析
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2003 Feb;23(1):16-20.
9
The Effect of Mode of Delivery and Hospital Type on Newborn Hearing Screening Results Using Otoacoustic Emissions: Based on Screening Age.分娩方式和医院类型对使用耳声发射进行新生儿听力筛查结果的影响:基于筛查年龄
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Mar;69(1):1-5. doi: 10.1007/s12070-016-0967-3. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
10
The results of newborn hearing screening by means of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.通过瞬态诱发耳声发射进行新生儿听力筛查的结果。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005 Oct;69(10):1351-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.03.023.

引用本文的文献

1
Test and retest reliability of objective screening tests in neonatal hearing screening program in developing countries.发展中国家新生儿听力筛查项目中客观筛查测试的重测信度。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Apr;282(4):1843-1851. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-09085-y. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
2
Assessment of Deafness in Term Infants with Birth Asphyxia with Otoacoustic Emission and Brain Stem Evoked Response Audiometry: A Prospective Observational Study.应用耳声发射和脑干听觉诱发电位对足月窒息新生儿耳聋的评估:一项前瞻性观察研究
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Oct;76(5):3876-3885. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-04736-2. Epub 2024 May 22.
3
Evaluating the feasibility of a tele-diagnostic auditory brainstem response service in a rural context.评估远程诊断听觉脑干反应服务在农村环境中的可行性。
S Afr J Commun Disord. 2024 Jul 31;71(1):e1-e9. doi: 10.4102/sajcd.v71i1.1020.
4
Effects of Natural Delivery and Cesarean Section on the Result of First Hearing Screening of Newborns.自然分娩与剖宫产对新生儿初次听力筛查结果的影响。
Noise Health. 2024;26(121):226-230. doi: 10.4103/nah.nah_68_23. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
5
Analysis of the Referral Rates of Newborn Hearing Screening Test According to Childbirth Delivery Methods in Neonatal Care Units.新生儿护理单位中按分娩方式分析新生儿听力筛查测试的转诊率
J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 29;10(13):2923. doi: 10.3390/jcm10132923.
6
The effects of mode of delivery, maternal age, birth weight, gender and family history on screening hearing results: A cross sectional study.分娩方式、产妇年龄、出生体重、性别及家族史对听力筛查结果的影响:一项横断面研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Mar 26;64:102236. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102236. eCollection 2021 Apr.
7
Our newborn hearing screening results.我们的新生儿听力筛查结果。
North Clin Istanb. 2021 Mar 12;8(2):167-171. doi: 10.14744/nci.2021.30806. eCollection 2021.
8
Perinatal factors influencing the neonatal hearing screening results.围生期因素对新生儿听力筛查结果的影响。
BMC Pediatr. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02476-0.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effect of Mode of Delivery and Hospital Type on Newborn Hearing Screening Results Using Otoacoustic Emissions: Based on Screening Age.分娩方式和医院类型对使用耳声发射进行新生儿听力筛查结果的影响:基于筛查年龄
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Mar;69(1):1-5. doi: 10.1007/s12070-016-0967-3. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
2
Association between mode of delivery and failure of neonatal acoustic emission test: a retrospective analysis.分娩方式与新生儿听觉发射测试失败之间的关联:一项回顾性分析。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Apr;79(4):516-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.01.019. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
3
Otoacoustic emissions in newborn hearing screening: a systematic review of the effects of different protocols on test outcomes.新生儿听力筛查中的耳声发射:不同方案对检测结果影响的系统评价
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 May;78(5):711-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.01.021. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
4
[Perinatal factors affecting the detection of otoacoustic emissions in vaginally delivered, healthy newborns, during the first 48 hours of life].[围产期因素对经阴道分娩的健康新生儿出生后48小时内耳声发射检测的影响]
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2014 Jan-Feb;65(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.otorri.2013.07.007. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
5
Time after birth in relation to failure rate in newborn hearing screening.出生后时间与新生儿听力筛查失败率的关系
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Jun;77(6):932-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.03.010. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
6
Delayed first otoacoustic emissions test decreases failure on neonatal hearing screening after caesarean delivery.剖宫产新生儿听力筛查中延迟初次耳声发射测试可降低其漏筛率。
Acta Paediatr. 2013 May;102(5):e194-9. doi: 10.1111/apa.12175. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
7
Birth by cesarean delivery and failure on first otoacoustic emissions hearing test.经剖宫产分娩和首次耳声发射听力测试失败。
Pediatrics. 2012 Jul;130(1):e95-100. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3179. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
8
Is discordance in TEOAE and AABR outcomes predictable in newborns?
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Nov;74(11):1303-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.08.010. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
9
Clinical practice for children with mild bilateral and unilateral hearing loss.儿童双侧和单侧轻度听力损失的临床实践。
Ear Hear. 2010 Jun;31(3):392-400. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181cdb2b9.
10
Year 2007 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs.2007年立场声明:早期听力检测与干预项目的原则和指南
Pediatrics. 2007 Oct;120(4):898-921. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2333.