• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

深入了解传统、补充替代和整合医学期刊发表研究的特点:文献计量分析。

Insight into the characteristics of research published in traditional, complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine journals: a bibliometric analysis.

机构信息

Centre for Journalology, Ottawa Methods Centre, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, General Campus, Centre for Practice Changing Research Building, 501 Smyth Road, PO BOX 201B, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada.

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Michael G. DeGroote Centre for Learning and Discovery, Room 2112, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Complement Med Ther. 2021 Jul 1;21(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12906-021-03354-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12906-021-03354-7
PMID:34210316
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8246686/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Traditional, complementary, alternative and integrative medicine (TCAIM) can be described as diverse medical and healthcare interventions, practices, products, or disciplines that are not considered as part of conventional medicine. Inherent in its definition, TCAIMs are comprised of a wide variety of therapies with highly variable safety and effectiveness evidence profiles. Despite this, the use of many TCAIMs is highly prevalent among patients globally. The present study consists of a bibliometric analysis of TCAIM journals.

METHODS

A single search of all International Standard Serial Number (ISSNs) of all journals categorized as "complementary and alternative medicine" (code 2707) based on the All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) was run on Scopus on April 17, 2021. All publication types were included; no further search limits were applied. The following bibliometric data were collected: number of publications (in total and per year), authors and journals; open access status; journals publishing the highest volume of literature and their impact factors; language, countries, institutional affiliations, and funding sponsors of publications; most productive authors; and highest-cited publications. Trends associated with this subset of publications were identified and presented. Bibliometric indicators of production were calculated, and bibliometric networks were constructed and visualized using the software tool VOSviewer.

RESULTS

A total of 172,466 publications (42,331 open access), were published by 219,680 authors in 143 journals from 1938 to 2021. Since the 1940s, an upward trend with respect to the volume of publications can be observed, with a steep increase observed between the mid-2000s and mid-2010s. The journal that published the largest number of publications was the Journal of Natural Products (n = 15,144). The most productive countries included China (n = 45,860), the United States (n = 29,523), and Germany (n = 10,120); a number of the most common institutional affiliations and funding sponsors also originated from these three countries.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of publications collectively published in TCAIM journals follows an upward trend. Given a high prevalence of TCAIM use among patients, increased acceptance of TCAIM among conventional healthcare providers, and growing interest in the research of TCAIM, future work should continue to investigate and track changes in the publication characteristics of the emerging research on this topic.

摘要

背景

传统医学、补充医学、替代医学和整合医学(TCAIM)可被描述为多样化的医学和医疗干预措施、实践、产品或学科,它们不被视为常规医学的一部分。根据其定义,TCAIM 由各种具有高度可变安全性和有效性证据特征的疗法组成。尽管如此,全球患者对许多 TCAIM 的使用仍然非常普遍。本研究对 TCAIM 期刊进行了文献计量分析。

方法

于 2021 年 4 月 17 日,在 Scopus 上对基于所有科学期刊分类(ASJC)的所有被归类为“补充和替代医学”(代码 2707)的所有期刊的国际标准序列号(ISSN)进行了单次搜索。纳入了所有出版物类型;未应用其他搜索限制。收集了以下文献计量数据:出版物总数(每年和每年)、作者和期刊;开放获取状态;发表文献数量最多的期刊及其影响因子;出版物的语言、国家、机构隶属关系和资助赞助商;最有成效的作者;以及高被引文献。确定并呈现了与这组出版物相关的趋势。计算了生产指标的文献计量学指标,并使用 VOSviewer 软件工具构建和可视化了文献计量网络。

结果

自 1938 年至 2021 年,共有 172466 篇出版物(42331 篇开放获取)由 219680 位作者在 143 种期刊上发表。自 20 世纪 40 年代以来,可以观察到出版物数量呈上升趋势,2000 年代中期至 2010 年代中期呈急剧上升趋势。发表文献数量最多的期刊是《天然产物杂志》(n=15144)。最有成效的国家包括中国(n=45860)、美国(n=29523)和德国(n=10120);一些最常见的机构隶属关系和资助赞助商也来自这三个国家。

结论

TCAIM 期刊发表的论文数量呈上升趋势。鉴于患者对 TCAIM 的使用率较高,常规医疗保健提供者对 TCAIM 的接受度增加,以及对 TCAIM 研究的兴趣不断增加,未来的工作应继续调查和跟踪这一主题新兴研究的出版物特征变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a163/8246686/f5a0f1388469/12906_2021_3354_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a163/8246686/cba3d6494290/12906_2021_3354_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a163/8246686/ac411ea29c94/12906_2021_3354_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a163/8246686/f5a0f1388469/12906_2021_3354_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a163/8246686/cba3d6494290/12906_2021_3354_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a163/8246686/ac411ea29c94/12906_2021_3354_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a163/8246686/f5a0f1388469/12906_2021_3354_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Insight into the characteristics of research published in traditional, complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine journals: a bibliometric analysis.深入了解传统、补充替代和整合医学期刊发表研究的特点:文献计量分析。
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2021 Jul 1;21(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12906-021-03354-7.
2
A bibliometric analysis of the cannabis and cannabinoid research literature.大麻与大麻素研究文献的文献计量分析
J Cannabis Res. 2022 May 25;4(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s42238-022-00133-0.
3
Global research trends at the intersection of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and traditional, integrative, and complementary and alternative medicine: a bibliometric analysis.全球研究趋势交汇于 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)与传统、整体、补充和替代医学:文献计量分析。
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2020 Nov 23;20(1):353. doi: 10.1186/s12906-020-03151-8.
4
Bibliometric Analysis of Integrative Medicine Studies from 2000 to 2019.2000 年至 2019 年的整合医学研究的文献计量学分析。
Am J Chin Med. 2021;49(4):829-841. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X21500397. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
5
Bibliometric analysis of literature on female genital mutilation: (1930 - 2015).女性生殖器切割文献的文献计量分析:(1930 - 2015年)
Reprod Health. 2016 Oct 10;13(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0243-8.
6
Mapping the Evolution of Digital Health Research: Bibliometric Overview of Research Hotspots, Trends, and Collaboration of Publications in JMIR (1999-2024).绘制数字健康研究的演进图:JMIR(1999-2024 年)研究热点、趋势和出版物合作的文献计量学概述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 17;26:e58987. doi: 10.2196/58987.
7
Worldwide productivity in the hand and wrist literature: A bibliometric analysis of four highly cited subspecialty journals.全球手部和腕部文献的生产力:对四份高被引专科期刊的文献计量分析。
Int J Surg. 2016 Apr;28:8-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.02.029. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
8
[Bibliometric analysis of papers published in revista peruana de medicina experimental y salud pública, 2010-2017].[2010 - 2017年发表于《秘鲁实验医学与公共卫生杂志》的论文计量分析]
Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2018 Oct-Dec;35(4):620-629. doi: 10.17843/rpmesp.2018.354.3817.
9
Scientific publications from mainland China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong in integrative and complementary medicine journals: a ten-year literature survey.中国大陆、台湾和香港在综合与补充医学期刊上的科学出版物:十年文献调查。
Am J Chin Med. 2011;39(4):639-49. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X11009081.
10
Highly cited articles in health care sciences and services field in Science Citation Index Expanded. A bibliometric analysis for 1958 - 2012.《科学引文索引扩展版》中医疗保健科学与服务领域的高被引文章。1958 - 2012年的文献计量分析
Methods Inf Med. 2014;53(6):446-58. doi: 10.3414/ME14-01-0022. Epub 2014 Oct 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Bibliometrics and altmetrics in the context of traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine.传统、补充和整合医学背景下的文献计量学与替代计量学
Integr Med Res. 2025 Sep;14(3):101181. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2025.101181. Epub 2025 Jun 17.
2
Exploring the intersection of brain-computer interfaces and traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine.探索脑机接口与传统医学、补充医学和整合医学的交叉领域。
Integr Med Res. 2025 Jun;14(2):101142. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2025.101142. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
3
The case for data sharing in traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine research.

本文引用的文献

1
A Bibliometric and Mapping Analysis of Glaucoma Research between 1900 and 2019.1900年至2019年青光眼研究的文献计量与图谱分析
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2022 Jan-Feb;5(1):16-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2021.05.008. Epub 2021 May 31.
2
Bibliometric Analysis of Integrative Medicine Studies from 2000 to 2019.2000 年至 2019 年的整合医学研究的文献计量学分析。
Am J Chin Med. 2021;49(4):829-841. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X21500397. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
3
Evidence Base of Clinical Studies on Qi Gong: A Bibliometric Analysis.气功临床研究证据:文献计量分析。
传统、补充和整合医学研究中的数据共享理由。
Integr Med Res. 2025 Mar;14(1):101101. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2024.101101. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
4
How can meta-research be used to evaluate and improve the quality of research in the field of traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine?元研究如何用于评估和提高传统医学、补充医学和整合医学领域的研究质量?
Integr Med Res. 2024 Sep;13(3):101068. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2024.101068. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
5
Online scientific research on placentophagy: a bibliometric analysis.胎盘食入的在线科学研究:文献计量分析。
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2024 Mar 15;46. doi: 10.61622/rbgo/2024AR04. eCollection 2024.
6
Complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine researchers' practices and perceived barriers related to open science: An international, cross-sectional survey.补充、替代和整合医学研究人员与开放科学相关的实践和感知障碍:一项国际、横断面调查。
PLoS One. 2024 May 6;19(5):e0301251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301251. eCollection 2024.
7
Investigating the nature of open science practices across complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine journals: An audit.探究补充医学、替代医学和整合医学期刊中开放科学实践的本质:一项审计。
PLoS One. 2024 May 3;19(5):e0302655. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302655. eCollection 2024.
8
Characteristics of bibliometric analyses of the complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine literature: A scoping review protocol.补充、替代和整合医学文献的文献计量分析特征:范围综述方案。
F1000Res. 2023 Oct 18;12:164. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.130326.1. eCollection 2023.
9
Managing depression with complementary and alternative medicine therapies: a scientometric analysis and visualization of research activities.运用补充和替代医学疗法治疗抑郁症:研究活动的科学计量分析与可视化
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 15;14:1288346. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1288346. eCollection 2023.
10
Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic herb-drug interactions-part I. Herbal medicines of the central nervous system.药代动力学和药效学的草药-药物相互作用-第一部分。中枢神经系统的草药。
PeerJ. 2023 Nov 15;11:e16149. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16149. eCollection 2023.
Complement Ther Med. 2020 May;50:102392. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102392. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
4
Worldwide Research Trends on Medicinal Plants.药用植物的全球研究趋势。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 12;17(10):3376. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103376.
5
A scoping review of network meta-analyses assessing the efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative medicine interventions.补充和替代医学干预措施的疗效和安全性的网络荟萃分析的范围综述。
Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 30;9(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01328-3.
6
Bibliometric Analysis of Research Assessing the Use of Acupuncture for Pain Treatment Over the Past 20 Years.过去20年评估针灸用于疼痛治疗的研究的文献计量分析
J Pain Res. 2020 Feb 11;13:367-376. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S235047. eCollection 2020.
7
Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources.哪些学术搜索系统适用于系统评价或荟萃分析?评估 Google Scholar、PubMed 和其他 26 个资源的检索质量。
Res Synth Methods. 2020 Mar;11(2):181-217. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1378. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
8
Production Trends, Collaboration, and Main Topics of the Integrative and Complementary Oncology Research Area: A Bibliometric Analysis.整合与互补肿瘤学研究领域的生产趋势、合作与主要议题:文献计量分析。
Integr Cancer Ther. 2019 Jan-Dec;18:1534735419846401. doi: 10.1177/1534735419846401.
9
Current Research Trends in Traditional Chinese Medicine Formula: A Bibliometric Review from 2000 to 2016.中药方剂的当前研究趋势:2000年至2016年的文献计量学综述
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2019 Mar 3;2019:3961395. doi: 10.1155/2019/3961395. eCollection 2019.
10
Why Chinese medicine is heading for clinics around the world.为什么中医正走向世界各地的诊所。
Nature. 2018 Sep;561(7724):448-450. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-06782-7.