Kashiwagi Nobuo, Tanaka Hisashi, Yamashita Yuichi, Takahashi Hiroto, Kassai Yoshimori, Fujiwara Masahiro, Tomiyama Noriyuki
Department of Future Diagnostic Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Division of Health Science, Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Acta Radiol Open. 2021 Jun 18;10(6):20584601211023939. doi: 10.1177/20584601211023939. eCollection 2021 Jun.
Several deep learning-based methods have been proposed for addressing the long scanning time of magnetic resonance imaging. Most are trained using brain 3T magnetic resonance images, but is unclear whether performance is affected when applying these methods to different anatomical sites and at different field strengths.
To validate the denoising performance of deep learning-based reconstruction method trained by brain and knee 3T magnetic resonance images when applied to lumbar 1.5T magnetic resonance images.
Using a 1.5T scanner, we obtained lumber T2-weighted sequences in 10 volunteers using three different scanning times: 228 s (standard), 119 s (double-fast), and 68 s (triple-fast). We compared the images obtained by the standard sequence with those obtained by the deep learning-based reconstruction-applied faster sequences.
Signal-to-noise ratio values were significantly higher for deep learning-based reconstruction-double-fast than for standard and did not differ significantly between deep learning-based reconstruction-triple-fast and standard. Contrast-to-noise ratio values also did not differ significantly between deep learning-based reconstruction-triple-fast and standard. Qualitative scores for perceived signal-to-noise ratio and overall image quality were significantly higher for deep learning-based reconstruction-double fast and deep learning-based reconstruction-triple-fast than for standard. Average scores for sharpness, contrast, and structure visibility were equal to or higher for deep learning-based reconstruction-double-fast and deep learning-based reconstruction-triple-fast than for standard, but the differences were not statistically significant. The average scores for artifact were lower for deep learning-based reconstruction-double-fast and deep learning-based reconstruction-triple-fast than for standard, but the differences were not statistically significant.
The deep learning-based reconstruction method trained by 3T brain and knee images may reduce the scanning time of 1.5T lumbar magnetic resonance images by one-third without sacrificing image quality.
已经提出了几种基于深度学习的方法来解决磁共振成像扫描时间长的问题。大多数方法是使用脑部3T磁共振图像进行训练的,但尚不清楚将这些方法应用于不同解剖部位和不同场强时,其性能是否会受到影响。
验证基于深度学习的重建方法在应用于腰椎1.5T磁共振图像时的去噪性能,该方法由脑部和膝部3T磁共振图像训练而成。
使用1.5T扫描仪,我们在10名志愿者中获得了腰椎T2加权序列,采用三种不同的扫描时间:228秒(标准)、119秒(双快速)和68秒(三快速)。我们将标准序列获得的图像与基于深度学习重建的更快序列获得的图像进行了比较。
基于深度学习重建的双快速序列的信噪比显著高于标准序列,基于深度学习重建的三快速序列与标准序列之间的信噪比无显著差异。基于深度学习重建的三快速序列与标准序列之间的对比度噪声比也无显著差异。基于深度学习重建的双快速序列和基于深度学习重建的三快速序列在感知信噪比和整体图像质量方面的定性评分显著高于标准序列。基于深度学习重建的双快速序列和基于深度学习重建的三快速序列在锐度、对比度和结构可见性方面的平均评分等于或高于标准序列,但差异无统计学意义。基于深度学习重建的双快速序列和基于深度学习重建的三快速序列在伪影方面的平均评分低于标准序列,但差异无统计学意义。
由3T脑部和膝部图像训练的基于深度学习的重建方法可以将1.5T腰椎磁共振图像的扫描时间缩短三分之一,而不牺牲图像质量。