Amir Razaghizad, Sarah B. Windle, Kristian B. Filion, and Mark J. Eisenberg are with the Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada. Genevieve Gore is with the Schulich Library of Physical Sciences, Life Sciences, and Engineering, McGill University, Montreal. Irina Kudrina is with the Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University. Elena Paraskevopoulos is with the Department of Anesthesia, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University. Jonathan Kimmelman is with the Studies of Translation, Ethics, and Medicine Biomedical Ethics Unit, McGill University. Marc O. Martel is with the Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University.
Am J Public Health. 2021 Aug;111(8):e1-e12. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306306. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
Opioids contribute to more than 60 000 deaths annually in North America. While the expansion of overdose education and naloxone distribution (OEND) programs has been recommended in response to the opioid crisis, their effectiveness remains unclear. To conduct an umbrella review of systematic reviews to provide a broad-based conceptual scheme of the effect and feasibility of OEND and to identify areas for possible optimization. We conducted the umbrella review of systematic reviews by searching PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Epistemonikos, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the reference lists of relevant articles. Briefly, an academic librarian used a 2-concept search, which included opioid subject headings and relevant keywords with a modified PubMed systematic review filter. Eligible systematic reviews described comprehensive search strategies and inclusion and exclusion criteria, evaluated the quality or risk of bias of included studies, were published in English or French, and reported data relevant to either the safety or effectiveness of OEND programs, or optimal strategies for the management of opioid overdose with naloxone in out-of-hospital settings. Two reviewers independently extracted study characteristics and the quality of included reviews was assessed in duplicate with AMSTAR-2, a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews. Review quality was rated critically low, low, moderate, or high based on 7 domains: protocol registration, literature search adequacy, exclusion criteria, risk of bias assessment, meta-analytical methods, result interpretation, and presence of publication bias. Summary tables were constructed, and confidence ratings were provided for each outcome by using a previously modified version of the Royal College of General Practitioners' clinical guidelines. Six systematic reviews containing 87 unique studies were included. We found that OEND programs produce long-term knowledge improvement regarding opioid overdose, improve participants' attitudes toward naloxone, provide sufficient training for participants to safely and effectively manage overdoses, and effectively reduce opioid-related mortality. High-concentration intranasal naloxone (> 2 mg/mL) was as effective as intramuscular naloxone at the same dose, whereas lower-concentration intranasal naloxone was less effective. Evidence was limited for other naloxone formulations, as well as the need for hospital transport after overdose reversal. The preponderance of evidence pertained persons who use heroin. Evidence suggests that OEND programs are effective for reducing opioid-related mortality; however, additional high-quality research is required to optimize program delivery. Community-based OEND programs should be implemented widely in high-risk populations.
阿片类药物每年导致北美超过 60000 人死亡。虽然为应对阿片类药物危机而建议扩大过量用药教育和纳洛酮分发(OEND)计划,但这些计划的效果仍不清楚。本研究旨在通过对系统评价进行伞式审查,提供一个广泛的概念框架,说明 OEND 的效果和可行性,并确定可能需要优化的领域。我们通过搜索 PubMed、Embase、PsycINFO、Epistemonikos、Cochrane 系统评价数据库和相关文章的参考文献列表,对系统评价进行了伞式审查。简要来说,一名学术图书馆员使用了 2 个概念搜索,其中包括阿片类药物主题词和带有修改后的 PubMed 系统评价过滤器的相关关键词。合格的系统评价描述了全面的搜索策略以及纳入和排除标准,评估了纳入研究的质量或偏倚风险,以英文或法文发表,并报告了与 OEND 计划的安全性或有效性相关的数据,或在院外环境中使用纳洛酮治疗阿片类药物过量的最佳管理策略。两名审查员独立提取研究特征,并使用 AMSTAR-2(一种用于系统评价的关键评估工具)对纳入的综述进行重复评估。根据 7 个领域,对综述质量进行了批判性低、低、中、高的评级:方案注册、文献检索充分性、排除标准、偏倚风险评估、荟萃分析方法、结果解释和是否存在发表偏倚。根据之前修改过的皇家全科医师学院临床指南,我们构建了总结表,并对每个结果提供了置信度评级。共纳入 6 项系统评价,包含 87 项独特研究。我们发现,OEND 计划可长期提高有关阿片类药物过量的知识,改善参与者对纳洛酮的态度,为参与者提供安全有效管理过量的充分培训,并有效降低阿片类药物相关死亡率。高浓度鼻内纳洛酮(>2mg/mL)与相同剂量的肌肉内纳洛酮一样有效,而低浓度鼻内纳洛酮效果较差。其他纳洛酮制剂以及过量逆转后是否需要住院治疗的证据有限。大部分证据涉及使用海洛因的人。有证据表明,OEND 计划可有效降低阿片类药物相关死亡率;但是,需要开展更多高质量的研究来优化计划的实施。应在高危人群中广泛实施基于社区的 OEND 计划。