• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国食品药品监督管理局的历史、现状和政治化。

History, status, and politicization of the FDA.

机构信息

Touro College of Pharmacy, New York, NY, USA.

Touro College of Pharmacy, New York, NY, USA; Nova Southeastern University, College of Pharmacy, Ft Lauderdale, FL, 33328, USA.

出版信息

Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 May;18(5):2811-2816. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.06.009. Epub 2021 Jun 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.06.009
PMID:34215537
Abstract

The Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) performs an essential role in public health by ensuring, evaluating, and monitoring the safety and efficacy of drugs before they are sold in the US. Before approving new drug applications, CDER ensures that therapeutic benefits of both prescription and over-the-counter drugs (brand name and generic) provide more health benefits than the potential risks. First passed by Congress in 1992, the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) allowed the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to collect fees from drug manufacturers to fund new drug approvals. The law allowed the FDA to expedite drug approvals, but possibly lowered standards for safety and brought potential conflicts of interest within the FDA and pharmaceutical industry. To examine the conflicts of interest, we conducted a review using the Excerpta Medica database, US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health Database (PubMed), Scopus, and Google. Our search yielded Vioxx (rofecoxib) and Exondus-51 (eteplirsen) as examples of consequence when the FDA and pharmaceutical industry are too closely aligned. We further examine how the pharmaceutical industry may indirectly influence the FDA by lobbying to Congress or directly by hiring ex-FDA commissioners.

摘要

药品评估与研究中心(CDER)通过确保、评估和监测药品在美国上市前的安全性和有效性,在公共卫生方面发挥着重要作用。在批准新药申请之前,CDER 确保处方药和非处方药(品牌药和仿制药)的治疗益处带来的健康益处超过潜在风险。该法案于 1992 年首次由国会通过,《处方药使用者付费法案》(PDUFA)允许食品和药物管理局(FDA)向制药商收取费用,以资助新药批准。该法律允许 FDA 加快药物批准,但可能降低了安全性标准,并在 FDA 和制药行业内部带来了潜在的利益冲突。为了检查利益冲突,我们使用 Excerpta Medica 数据库、美国国家医学图书馆美国国立卫生研究院数据库(PubMed)、Scopus 和 Google 进行了审查。我们的搜索结果显示,Vioxx(罗非昔布)和 Exondus-51(eteplirsen)是 FDA 和制药行业过于紧密结盟时的后果的例子。我们进一步研究了制药行业如何通过向国会游说或直接雇用前 FDA 专员来间接影响 FDA。

相似文献

1
History, status, and politicization of the FDA.美国食品药品监督管理局的历史、现状和政治化。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 May;18(5):2811-2816. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.06.009. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
2
FDA Approval and Regulation of Pharmaceuticals, 1983-2018.FDA 对药品的批准与监管,1983-2018 年。
JAMA. 2020 Jan 14;323(2):164-176. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.20288.
3
The Prescription Drug User Fee Act: Much More Than User Fees.《处方药使用者付费法案》:不仅仅是使用者付费。
Med Care. 2022 Apr 1;60(4):287-293. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001692.
4
Industry funding of the FDA: effects of PDUFA on approval times and withdrawal rates.美国食品药品监督管理局的行业资助:《处方药使用者付费法案》对审批时间和撤市率的影响
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005 Jul;4(7):545-54. doi: 10.1038/nrd1774.
5
The prescription Drug User Fee Act of 1992 and the new drug development process.1992年《处方药使用者付费法案》与新药研发流程
Am J Ther. 1997 May-Jun;4(5-6):167-72. doi: 10.1097/00045391-199705000-00002.
6
The timing of 30-month stay expirations and generic entry: A cohort study of first generics, 2013-2020.30 个月停留期满时间和仿制药进入市场的时间:2013-2020 年第一代仿制药的队列研究。
Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Sep;14(5):1917-1923. doi: 10.1111/cts.13046. Epub 2021 May 31.
7
2020: A Record Year for Drug Approvals.2020 年:药物批准创纪录的一年。
Sr Care Pharm. 2021 Apr 1;36(4):174-175. doi: 10.4140/TCP.n.2021.174.
8
Expedited Programs for Serious Conditions: An Update on Breakthrough Therapy Designation.针对严重病症的加速计划:突破性疗法认定的最新情况
Clin Ther. 2015 Sep;37(9):2104-20. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.07.011. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
9
Approval times for new drugs: does the source of funding for FDA staff matter?新药审批时间:美国食品药品监督管理局工作人员的资金来源重要吗?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 Jul-Dec;Suppl Web Exclusives:W3-618-24. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.w3.618.
10
Approvals and Timing of New Formulations of Novel Drugs Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration Between 1995 and 2010 and Followed Through 2021.1995 年至 2010 年期间获得美国食品和药物管理局批准的新型药物的新配方的批准和时间,并跟踪到 2021 年。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 May 20;3(5):e221096. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.1096. eCollection 2022 May.

引用本文的文献

1
Threats to Democracy and the Right to Health.对民主和健康权的威胁。
Am J Public Health. 2025 Mar;115(3):307-309. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307992.
2
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Approvals of Biological Drugs in 2023.美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)2023年生物药品批准情况
Biomedicines. 2024 Sep 2;12(9):1992. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12091992.
3
Across Time: A Chronological Progression of Clinical Trials in India.跨越时间:印度临床试验的时间顺序进展
Cureus. 2024 Mar 23;16(3):e56786. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56786. eCollection 2024 Mar.