Suppr超能文献

ACA 的“保证发行”条款是否导致非团体保险的逆向选择?基于Copula 的障碍模型分析。

Did the ACA's "guaranteed issue" provision cause adverse selection into nongroup insurance? Analysis using a copula-based hurdle model.

机构信息

Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK.

Cass Business School City, University of London, London, UK.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2021 Sep;30(9):2246-2263. doi: 10.1002/hec.4372. Epub 2021 Jul 2.

Abstract

Prior to the Affordable Care Act (ACA), insurance companies could charge higher premiums, or outright deny coverage, to people with preexisting health problems. But the ACA's "guaranteed issue" provision forbids such price discrimination and denials of coverage. This paper seeks to determine whether, after implementation of the ACA, nongroup private insurance plans have experienced adverse selection. Our empirical approach employs a copula-based hurdle regression model, with dependence modeled as a function of dimensions along which adverse selection might occur. Our main finding is that, after implementation of the ACA, nongroup insurance enrollees with preexisting health problems do not appear to exhibit adverse selection. This finding suggests that the ACA's mandate that everyone acquire coverage might have attracted enough healthy enrollees to offset any adverse selection.

摘要

在平价医疗法案(ACA)实施之前,保险公司可以向有既往健康问题的人收取更高的保费,或者直接拒绝提供保险。但 ACA 的“保证发行”条款禁止这种价格歧视和拒保。本文旨在确定在 ACA 实施后,非团体私人保险计划是否经历了逆向选择。我们的实证方法采用了基于 Copula 的障碍回归模型,其依赖性被建模为可能发生逆向选择的维度的函数。我们的主要发现是,在 ACA 实施后,有既往健康问题的非团体保险参保者似乎没有表现出逆向选择。这一发现表明,ACA 要求每个人都获得保险的规定可能吸引了足够多的健康参保者来抵消任何逆向选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验