Dencker Anna, Li Huiqi, Lyckestam Thelin Ida, Smith Valerie, Nilsson Christina, Lundgren Ingela, Ladfors Lars, Elfvin Anders
Institute of Health and Care Sciences, University of Gothenburg Sahlgrenska Academy, Goteborg, Sweden
School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg Sahlgrenska Academy, Goteborg, Sweden.
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2025 Mar 25;9(1):e003026. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003026.
To explore health outcomes up to 5 years of age, according to mode of birth, in a large cohort of Swedish children who were born as a second child to women who had a caesarean section (CS) in their first pregnancy.
Retrospective population-based register study.
All children (n=94 498) who were born as a second child (or children in cases of twins or higher-order multiple births) during 1999-2015 in Sweden in women who had a CS first birth. The children were followed up to 5 years of age. For inclusion, both births must have occurred in Sweden.
A nationwide cohort study using follow-up data up to 5 years of age. Maternal factors, including age, smoking, diabetes, obesity (body mass index ≥30), mental illness, pre-eclampsia, education, income, country of birth and the neonatal factors of being a singleton and prematurity (up to week 36+6) were adjusted for in regression models.
Developmental problems, asthma, allergy, hospital care and death within 5 years of age.
A total of 94 498 children were included in the study. Risk for developmental problems, asthma and allergy was increased after repeat CS but not after vaginal birth. The need for hospital care was increased in all other birth modes compared with spontaneous vaginal birth. The risk of death within 5 years increased after instrumental vaginal birth and emergency repeat CS.
All repeat CS compared with spontaneous vaginal birth was related to increased risks for developmental problems, asthma, allergy and hospital stay, and emergency repeat CS was associated with an increased risk of death within 5 years. The results of the present study support vaginal birth as the optimal mode of birth after previous CS for longer-term child health outcomes.
在一大群瑞典儿童中,根据出生方式探究5岁前的健康状况,这些儿童是首次怀孕行剖宫产的女性所生的第二个孩子。
基于人群的回顾性登记研究。
1999年至2015年期间在瑞典,首次分娩行剖宫产的女性所生的第二个孩子(双胞胎或多胞胎中的孩子)。所有孩子随访至5岁。纳入标准为两次分娩均发生在瑞典。
一项全国性队列研究,使用随访至5岁的数据。在回归模型中对母亲因素进行了调整,包括年龄、吸烟、糖尿病、肥胖(体重指数≥30)、精神疾病、先兆子痫、教育程度、收入、出生国家以及单胎和早产(至36 + 6周)等新生儿因素。
5岁内的发育问题、哮喘、过敏、住院治疗和死亡情况。
共94498名儿童纳入研究。再次剖宫产术后发育问题、哮喘和过敏的风险增加,而阴道分娩后未增加。与自然阴道分娩相比,所有其他分娩方式的住院需求均增加。器械助产阴道分娩和急诊再次剖宫产术后5年内死亡风险增加。
与自然阴道分娩相比,所有再次剖宫产均与发育问题、哮喘、过敏和住院风险增加相关,急诊再次剖宫产与5年内死亡风险增加相关。本研究结果支持阴道分娩作为首次剖宫产术后长期儿童健康结局的最佳分娩方式。