• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

布立西坦辅助治疗成人局灶性至双侧强直阵挛(继发性全面性)癫痫发作的长期疗效和耐受性:事后汇总分析

Long-term efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam in adults with focal to bilateral tonic-clonic (secondary generalized) seizures: Post hoc pooled analysis.

作者信息

Moseley Brian D, Dimova Svetlana, Elmoufti Sami, Laloyaux Cédric, Asadi-Pooya Ali A

机构信息

Department of Neurology & Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati, 260 Stetson Street, Suite 2300, Cincinnati, OH, 45267-0525, USA.

UCB Pharma, Allée de la Recherche 60, B-1070, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Epilepsy Res. 2021 Oct;176:106694. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2021.106694. Epub 2021 Jun 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2021.106694
PMID:34218211
Abstract

This post hoc analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy, tolerability, and health-related quality of life during long-term adjunctive brivaracetam (BRV) treatment in adult patients with focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS). Patients (≥ 16 years) were included in this post hoc analysis if they were randomized to BRV or placebo in double-blind, placebo-controlled (N01252 [NCT00490035], N01253 [NCT00464269], N01358 [NCT01261325]; core) trials, and received adjunctive BRV in the corresponding long-term follow-up (N01125 [NCT00175916], N01199 [NCT00150800], N01379 [NCT01339559]) trials, and reported FBTCS during the 8-week prospective baseline (core trial). Efficacy (concomitant levetiracetam excluded) and tolerability (concomitant levetiracetam included) were assessed from the first day of BRV in patients who initiated BRV at 50-200 mg/day. Two hundred and eighty-four patients reported FBTCS during baseline (core trials) and were included in the Efficacy Set. Patients (mean age of 37.0 years; 51.8% male; mean epilepsy duration of 22.4 years; median baseline frequency of 2.8 FBTCS per 28 days) received BRV for a median treatment duration of 2.5 years (range< 0.1-11.3) at a median modal dose of 150 mg/day. BRV was discontinued by 175 (61.6%) patients, most commonly (≥ 10% of patients) due to adverse event (18.3%), lack of efficacy (18.3%), and consent withdrawn (11.6%); the median time to discontinuation of BRV due to any reason was 358.5 days. The Kaplan-Meier (KM)-estimated retention on BRV at 1, 3, and 5 years, were 69.3%, 48.2%, and 37.3%, respectively. The KM-estimated proportion of patients not discontinuing BRV due to lack of efficacy or adverse event were 80.0%, 63.9%, and 57.2% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Overall, the median percentage reduction in FBTCS frequency from baseline was 76.2%, and the 50% and 75% responder rates for FBTCS were 68.7% and 50.7%, respectively, which were sustained over time across completer cohorts. Sustained 50%, 75%, and 100% response in FBTCS from day 1 of adjunctive BRV treatment during the entire first year was estimated for 32.5%, 21.1%, and 15.0% of patients, respectively (KM analysis), and showed maintenance or improvement in the response to BRV over time. For patients with ≥ 1 year of BRV exposure, 51.3% were free from FBTCS for ≥ 1 year during any time of the treatment period, and 22.8% of patients did not report FBTCS during the first year from the first day of treatment. Clinically meaningful improvements in total Patient Weighted Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-Form 31 (QOLIE-31-P) score were reported by 43.6% and 46.4% of patients after 1 and 2 years of treatment, respectively. The largest improvements in the QOLIE-31-P score, with > 50% of patients reporting a clinically meaningful improvement, were observed in the seizure worry and daily activities/social functioning subscales after 1 and 2 years of BRV treatment. Overall, 278/313 (88.8%; Safety Set) patients reported at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), 170 (54.3%) had a drug-related TEAE, 88 (28.1%) had a serious TEAE, and 55 (17.6%) discontinued BRV due to a TEAE. Overall, long-term adjunctive BRV was generally well tolerated and reduced the frequency of FBTCS in adults, with 22.8% of patients (who completed ≥ 1 year of treatment) not reporting any FBTCS during the first year from the first day of BRV treatment.

摘要

本事后分析旨在评估长期辅助使用布瓦西坦(BRV)治疗局灶性至双侧强直阵挛性发作(FBTCS)成年患者期间的疗效、耐受性及与健康相关的生活质量。如果患者(≥16岁)在双盲、安慰剂对照试验(N01252 [NCT00490035]、N01253 [NCT00464269]、N01358 [NCT01261325];核心试验)中被随机分配至BRV或安慰剂组,并在相应的长期随访试验(N01125 [NCT00175916]、N01199 [NCT00150800]、N01379 [NCT01339559])中接受辅助BRV治疗,且在8周前瞻性基线期(核心试验)报告有FBTCS,则纳入本事后分析。从开始以50 - 200 mg/天剂量服用BRV的患者中,自服用BRV的第一天起评估疗效(不包括同时服用左乙拉西坦)和耐受性(包括同时服用左乙拉西坦)。284例患者在基线期(核心试验)报告有FBTCS,被纳入疗效集。患者(平均年龄37.0岁;51.8%为男性;平均癫痫病程22.4年;基线期每28天FBTCS的中位数频率为2.8次)接受BRV治疗的中位持续时间为2.5年(范围<0.1 - 11.3年),中位模式剂量为150 mg/天。175例(61.6%)患者停用BRV,最常见的原因(≥10%的患者)是不良事件(18.3%)、缺乏疗效(18.3%)和撤回同意(11.6%);因任何原因停用BRV的中位时间为358.5天。采用Kaplan - Meier(KM)法估计,1年、3年和5年时BRV的保留率分别为69.3%、48.2%和37.3%。采用KM法估计,1年、3年和5年时因缺乏疗效或不良事件而未停用BRV的患者比例分别为80.0%、63.9%和57.2%。总体而言,FBTCS频率较基线期的中位数降低百分比为76.2%,FBTCS的50%和75%缓解率分别为68.7%和50.7%,在整个完整队列中随时间持续保持。在辅助BRV治疗的第1年,估计分别有32.5%、21.1%和15.0%的患者从第1天起FBTCS持续有50%、75%和100%的缓解(KM分析),且随时间推移对BRV的反应保持或改善。对于接受BRV治疗≥1年的患者,51.3%在治疗期的任何时间有≥1年无FBTCS,22.8%的患者从治疗第1天起第1年未报告FBTCS。治疗1年和2年后,分别有43.6%和46.4%的患者报告癫痫患者生活质量量表 - 31项简表(QOLIE - 31 - P)总分有临床意义的改善。在BRV治疗1年和2年后,癫痫担忧和日常活动/社会功能子量表中观察到QOLIE - 31 - P评分改善最大,>50%的患者报告有临床意义的改善。总体而言,278/313例(88.8%;安全集)患者报告至少1次治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAE),170例(54.3%)有与药物相关的TEAE,88例(28.1%)有严重TEAE,55例(17.6%)因TEAE停用BRV。总体而言,长期辅助使用BRV通常耐受性良好,可降低成年患者FBTCS的频率,22.8%的患者(完成≥1年治疗)从BRV治疗第1天起第1年未报告任何FBTCS。

相似文献

1
Long-term efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam in adults with focal to bilateral tonic-clonic (secondary generalized) seizures: Post hoc pooled analysis.布立西坦辅助治疗成人局灶性至双侧强直阵挛(继发性全面性)癫痫发作的长期疗效和耐受性:事后汇总分析
Epilepsy Res. 2021 Oct;176:106694. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2021.106694. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
2
Retention, efficacy, tolerability, and quality of life during long-term adjunctive brivaracetam treatment by number of lifetime antiseizure medications: A post hoc analysis of phase 3 trials in adults with focal seizures.根据终生抗癫痫药物数量评估长期辅助使用布瓦西坦治疗期间的保留率、疗效、耐受性及生活质量:针对成人局灶性癫痫患者3期试验的事后分析
Epilepsy Behav. 2023 Jan;138:108967. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108967. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
3
Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of brivaracetam as adjunctive therapy in patients with focal seizures, generalized onset seizures, or Unverricht-Lundborg disease: An open-label, long-term follow-up trial.在局灶性发作、全面性发作或 Unverricht-Lundborg 病患者中作为附加治疗使用布瓦西坦的安全性、耐受性和疗效:一项开放性、长期随访试验。
Epilepsy Res. 2021 Feb;170:106526. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2020.106526. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
4
Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam for secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures: Pooled results from three Phase III studies.辅助性布瓦西坦治疗继发性全面强直阵挛发作的疗效、安全性及耐受性:三项III期研究的汇总结果
Epilepsy Res. 2016 Nov;127:179-185. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2016.09.003. Epub 2016 Sep 3.
5
Effect of Number of Previous Antiseizure Medications on Efficacy and Tolerability of Adjunctive Brivaracetam for Uncontrolled Focal Seizures: Post Hoc Analysis.先前抗癫痫药物数量对附加使用布瓦西坦控制局灶性发作效果和耐受性的影响:事后分析。
Adv Ther. 2021 Jul;38(7):4082-4099. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01816-5. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
6
Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam in adult Asian patients with uncontrolled focal-onset seizures: A phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.在未得到控制的局灶性发作性癫痫的成年亚洲患者中,附加使用溴维曲坦的疗效、安全性和耐受性:一项 III 期随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Epilepsia Open. 2024 Jun;9(3):1007-1020. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12929. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
7
Safety, tolerability, and seizure control during long-term treatment with adjunctive brivaracetam for partial-onset seizures.辅助使用布瓦西坦长期治疗部分性发作期间的安全性、耐受性及癫痫控制情况。
Epilepsia. 2016 Jul;57(7):1139-51. doi: 10.1111/epi.13416. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
8
Efficacy and Tolerability of Adjunctive Brivaracetam in Patients with Focal-Onset Seizures on Specific Concomitant Antiseizure Medications: Pooled Analysis of Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trials.伴有特定伴随抗癫痫药物的局灶性发作患者中附加使用布瓦西坦的疗效和耐受性:双盲、安慰剂对照试验的汇总分析。
Adv Ther. 2024 Apr;41(4):1746-1758. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02795-z. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
9
Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of brivaracetam with concomitant lamotrigine or concomitant topiramate in pooled Phase III randomized, double-blind trials: A post-hoc analysis.在合并的III期随机双盲试验中,布瓦西坦与拉莫三嗪或托吡酯联用的疗效、安全性及耐受性:一项事后分析
Epilepsy Behav. 2018 Mar;80:129-134. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.12.024. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
10
Long-term safety and efficacy of brivaracetam in adults with focal seizures: Results from an open-label, multinational, follow-up trial.布瓦西坦用于局灶性癫痫成人患者的长期安全性和有效性:一项开放标签、多中心、随访试验的结果
Epilepsy Res. 2020 Oct;166:106404. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2020.106404. Epub 2020 Jun 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Brivaracetam: Pharmacology, Clinical Efficacy, and Safety in Epilepsy.布立伏西坦:癫痫的药理学、临床疗效及安全性
J Epilepsy Res. 2025 Jun 10;15(1):42-55. doi: 10.14581/jer.25005. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Effectiveness and Tolerability of 12-Month Brivaracetam in the Real World: EXPERIENCE, an International Pooled Analysis of Individual Patient Records.12 个月布瓦西坦的有效性和耐受性:EXPERIENCE,一项国际个体患者记录的汇总分析。
CNS Drugs. 2023 Sep;37(9):819-835. doi: 10.1007/s40263-023-01033-4. Epub 2023 Sep 9.