Suppr超能文献

一种利用赤藓糖醇气喷抛光和超声压电器械的新型生物膜清除方法(引导性生物膜治疗):一项随机对照试验。

A novel biofilm removal approach (Guided Biofilm Therapy) utilizing erythritol air-polishing and ultrasonic piezo instrumentation: A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Vouros Ioannis, Antonoglou Georgios N, Anoixiadou Styliani, Kalfas Sotirios

机构信息

Department of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Implant Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

出版信息

Int J Dent Hyg. 2022 May;20(2):381-390. doi: 10.1111/idh.12533. Epub 2021 Jul 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of biofilm removal of a treatment protocol combining an air-abrasive device using erythritol powder (AIRFLOW®) and an ultrasonic piezon instrumentation (Guided Biofilm Therapy/GBT) compared with the conventional mechanical approach (Scaling and Root Planing/SRP) during supportive periodontal treatment (SPT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty patients, scheduled for supportive periodontal treatment at the Department of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Implant Biology of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki were randomly assigned to either a GBT (group A: 24 participants) or a SRP (Group B: 26 participants) treatment protocol. Therapeutic interventions and clinical measurements were performed at baseline and repeated at 6 weeks. Oral hygiene instructions were reinforced at each visit. A questionnaire was handed to the participants for evaluation of patient perception of both utilized approaches.

RESULTS

At 6 weeks, the two groups showed statistically significant reduction in plaque score and in gingival bleeding index compared with baseline. GBT required approximately 15% less chair-time than SRP with a mean difference of 5.1 min, which was statically significant (p = 0.049). Patient perception was more favourable for GBT than SRP.

CONCLUSIONS

Biofilm removal using erythritol AIRFLOW® and ultrasonic piezo-electric instruments (GBT) can be considered equally efficient compared with the conventional SRP. Moreover, GBT seemed to require shorter treatment time and to exhibit a more favourable patient perception than the conventional approach.

摘要

目的

评估在支持性牙周治疗(SPT)期间,将使用赤藓糖醇粉末的空气研磨设备(AIRFLOW®)和超声压电器械(引导性生物膜治疗/GBT)相结合的治疗方案与传统机械方法(龈上洁治和根面平整/SRP)相比,去除生物膜的有效性。

材料与方法

50名计划在塞萨洛尼基亚里士多德大学预防牙科、牙周病学和种植生物学系接受支持性牙周治疗的患者被随机分配到GBT组(A组:24名参与者)或SRP组(B组:26名参与者)进行治疗方案。在基线时进行治疗干预和临床测量,并在6周时重复进行。每次就诊时都加强口腔卫生指导。向参与者发放问卷,以评估患者对两种使用方法的看法。

结果

在6周时,与基线相比,两组的菌斑评分和牙龈出血指数均有统计学意义的降低。GBT所需的椅旁时间比SRP少约15%,平均差异为5.1分钟,具有统计学意义(p = 0.049)。患者对GBT的看法比SRP更有利。

结论

与传统的SRP相比,使用赤藓糖醇AIRFLOW®和超声压电器械(GBT)去除生物膜可被认为同样有效。此外,GBT似乎需要更短的治疗时间,并且与传统方法相比,患者的看法更有利。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验