• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左心耳封堵术后结局的性别差异。

Sex Differences in Outcomes Following Left Atrial Appendage Closure.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

London Health Science Centre, London, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Mayo Clin Proc. 2021 Jul;96(7):1845-1860. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.11.031.

DOI:10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.11.031
PMID:34218859
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of female sex on in-hospital outcomes and to provide estimates for sex-specific prediction models of adverse outcomes following left atrial appendage closure (LAAC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Cohort-based observational study querying the National Inpatient Sample database between October 1, 2015, and December 31, 2017. Demographics, baseline characteristics, and comorbidities were assessed with the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Elixhauser Comorbidity Index score (ECS), and CHADS-VASc score. The primary outcome was in-hospital major adverse events (MAEs) defined as the composite of bleeding, vascular, cardiac complications, post-procedural stroke, and acute kidney injury. The associations of the CCI, ECS, and CHADS-VASc score with in-hospital MAE were examined using logistic regression models for women and men, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 3294 hospitalizations were identified, of which 1313 (40%) involved women and 1981 (60%) involved men. Women were older (76.3±7.7 vs 75.2±8.4 years, P<.001), had a higher CHADS-VASc score (4.9±1.4 vs 3.9±1.4, P<.001) but showed lower CCI and ECS compared with men (2.1±1.9 vs 2.3±1.9, P=.01; and 9.3±5.9 vs 9.9±5.7, P=.002, respectively). The primary composite outcome occurred in 4.6% of patients and was higher in women compared with men (women 5.6% vs men 4.0%, P=.04), and this was mainly driven by the occurrence of cardiac complications (2.4% vs 1.2%, P=.01). In women, older age, higher median income, and higher CCI (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21 to 1.44; P<.001), ECS (aOR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.07; P=.002), and CHADS-VASc score (aOR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.39; P<.001) were associated with increased risk of in-hospital MAE. In men, non-White race/ethnicity, lower median income, and higher ECS (aOR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.09; P<.001) were associated with increased risk of in-hospital MAE.

CONCLUSION

Women had higher rates of in-hospital adverse events following LAAC than men did. Women with older age and higher median income, CCI, ECS, and CHADS-VASc scores were associated with in-hospital adverse events, whereas men with non-White race/ethnicity, lower median income, and higher ECS were more likely to experience adverse events. Further research is warranted to identify sex-specific, racial/ethnic, and socioeconomic pathways during the patient selection process to minimize complications in patients undergoing LAAC.

摘要

目的

评估女性性别对住院结局的影响,并提供左心耳封堵术(LAAC)后不良结局的性别特异性预测模型的估计值。

患者和方法

本研究基于队列的观察性研究,在 2015 年 10 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间,查询了国家住院患者样本数据库。使用 Charlson 合并症指数(CCI)、Elixhauser 合并症指数评分(ECS)和 CHADS-VASc 评分评估人口统计学、基线特征和合并症。主要结局是住院期间的主要不良事件(MAE),定义为出血、血管、心脏并发症、术后中风和急性肾损伤的综合事件。使用逻辑回归模型分别评估 CCI、ECS 和 CHADS-VASc 评分与女性和男性住院 MAE 的相关性。

结果

共确定了 3294 例住院患者,其中 1313 例(40%)为女性,1981 例(60%)为男性。女性年龄更大(76.3±7.7 岁比 75.2±8.4 岁,P<.001),CHADS-VASc 评分更高(4.9±1.4 比 3.9±1.4,P<.001),但与男性相比,CCI 和 ECS 较低(2.1±1.9 比 2.3±1.9,P=.01;9.3±5.9 比 9.9±5.7,P=.002)。主要复合结局在 4.6%的患者中发生,女性发生率高于男性(女性 5.6%比男性 4.0%,P=.04),这主要是由于心脏并发症的发生(2.4%比 1.2%,P=.01)。在女性中,年龄较大、中位收入较高和 CCI 较高(调整后的优势比[aOR],1.32;95%置信区间[CI],1.21 至 1.44;P<.001)、ECS(aOR,1.04;95%CI,1.02 至 1.07;P=.002)和 CHADS-VASc 评分(aOR,1.24;95%CI,1.10 至 1.39;P<.001)与住院 MAE 风险增加相关。在男性中,非白种人/族裔、较低的中位收入和较高的 ECS(aOR,1.06;95%CI,1.04 至 1.09;P<.001)与住院 MAE 风险增加相关。

结论

女性在接受 LAAC 后住院期间不良事件的发生率高于男性。年龄较大、中位收入较高、CCI、ECS 和 CHADS-VASc 评分较高的女性与住院不良事件相关,而中位收入较低、非白种人/族裔和 ECS 较高的男性更有可能经历不良事件。需要进一步研究,以确定患者选择过程中的性别特异性、种族/族裔和社会经济途径,以尽量减少接受 LAAC 的患者的并发症。

相似文献

1
Sex Differences in Outcomes Following Left Atrial Appendage Closure.左心耳封堵术后结局的性别差异。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2021 Jul;96(7):1845-1860. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.11.031.
2
Left Atrial Appendage Closure Versus Direct Oral Anticoagulants in High-Risk Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.左心耳封堵术与直接口服抗凝剂在伴有心房颤动的高危患者中的比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jun 30;75(25):3122-3135. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.067.
3
Comorbidity burden in patients undergoing left atrial appendage closure.接受左心耳封堵术患者的合并症负担
Heart. 2021 Jul 12;107(15):1246-1253. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-317741.
4
Racial, ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in patients undergoing left atrial appendage closure.种族、民族和社会经济差异与接受左心耳封堵术的患者相关。
Heart. 2021 Dec;107(24):1946-1955. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-318650. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
5
Long-Term Safety and Efficacy in Continued Access Left Atrial Appendage Closure Registries.延续性左心耳封堵器使用登记研究的长期安全性和有效性。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Dec 10;74(23):2878-2889. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.09.064.
6
Cryoballoon pulmonary vein ablation and left atrial appendage closure combined procedure: A long-term follow-up analysis.冷冻球囊肺静脉消融联合左心耳封堵术:长期随访分析。
Heart Rhythm. 2019 Sep;16(9):1320-1326. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.03.022. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
7
Impact of chronic kidney disease on Watchman implantation: experience with 300 consecutive left atrial appendage closures at a single center.慢性肾脏病对Watchman植入术的影响:单中心连续300例左心耳封堵术的经验
Heart Vessels. 2018 Sep;33(9):1068-1075. doi: 10.1007/s00380-018-1157-x. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
8
Predictors of thrombus formation after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure using the WATCHMAN device.使用WATCHMAN装置经皮左心耳封堵术后血栓形成的预测因素。
Heart Vessels. 2017 Sep;32(9):1137-1143. doi: 10.1007/s00380-017-0971-x. Epub 2017 May 5.
9
Pericardial effusion requiring intervention in patients undergoing percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion: Prevalence, predictors, and associated in-hospital adverse events from 17,700 procedures in the United States.美国 17700 例经皮左心耳封堵术患者中需要干预的心包积液:发生率、预测因素及相关住院不良事件。
Heart Rhythm. 2021 Sep;18(9):1508-1515. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.05.017. Epub 2021 May 18.
10
Efficacy and safety of left atrial appendage closure in non-valvular atrial fibrillation in patients over 75 years.75岁以上非瓣膜性心房颤动患者左心耳封堵术的疗效与安全性
Heart Vessels. 2019 Nov;34(11):1858-1865. doi: 10.1007/s00380-019-01428-8. Epub 2019 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of Frailty With Readmissions and Outcomes After Impella Mechanical Circulatory Support.衰弱与Impella机械循环支持后再入院及预后的关联
CJC Open. 2025 Apr 22;7(7):972-985. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2025.04.011. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Gender differences in outcomes after left atrial appendage closure with Watchman FLX device: insights from the Italian-FLX registry.使用Watchman FLX装置进行左心耳封堵术后的结局性别差异:来自意大利-FLX注册研究的见解
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jul 25;11:1419018. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1419018. eCollection 2024.
3
Readmissions After Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Patients With Previous Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack.
既往有缺血性中风或短暂性脑缺血发作患者左心耳封堵术后的再入院情况
CJC Open. 2023 Sep 17;5(12):950-964. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2023.09.009. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Sociodemographic disparities in concomitant left atrial appendage occlusion during cardiac valve operations.心脏瓣膜手术同期左心耳封堵的社会人口统计学差异。
PLoS One. 2023 May 25;18(5):e0286337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286337. eCollection 2023.
5
Sex Differences in the Combined Ablation and Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Results From LAACablation Registry.联合消融与左心耳封堵的性别差异:来自LAAC消融注册研究的结果
JACC Asia. 2023 Jan 17;3(1):138-149. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2022.10.011. eCollection 2023 Feb.
6
Heart Failure Subtypes and Cardiomyopathies in Women.女性心力衰竭亚型和心肌病。
Circ Res. 2022 Feb 18;130(4):436-454. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.319900. Epub 2022 Feb 17.