University of British Columbia and Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Vancouver, and Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, British Columbia, Canada.
University of British Columbia and Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2022 Dec;74(12):1961-1969. doi: 10.1002/acr.24744. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
We aimed to identify, appraise, synthesize, and contextualize rapidly emerging reports on medication taking (adherence) among patients with rheumatic diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic.
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL for peer-reviewed communications, letters, and articles published during the COVID-19 pandemic evaluating medication taking among individuals with rheumatic diseases. We appraised assessment and reporting of medication adherence according to established definitions of 3 distinct problems of medication taking (i.e., noninitiation, poor implementation, and discontinuation) and pooled findings using random-effects models.
We included 31 peer-reviewed studies in our synthesis from various jurisdictions, of which 25 described medication taking among rheumatology patients and 6 described medication prescribing among rheumatology providers. The pooled prevalence of overall medication nonadherence was 14.8% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 12.3-17.2) and that of medication discontinuation (i.e., stopping of prescriptions) and poor implementation (i.e., not taking medication at the dose/frequency prescribed) as 9.5% (95% CI 5.1-14.0) and 9.6% (95% CI 6.2-13.0), respectively. Noninitiation (i.e., not starting/not filling new prescriptions) was not addressed.
Medication taking among individuals with rheumatic diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic varies globally. Unclear reporting and extensive variation in research methods between studies create barriers to research replication, comparison, and generalization to specific patient populations. Future research in this area should use consistent and transparent approaches to defining and measuring medication taking problems to ensure that findings appropriately describe the epidemiology of medication adherence and have the potential to identify modifiable targets for improving patient care.
我们旨在识别、评估、综合和分析 COVID-19 大流行期间风湿性疾病患者用药(依从性)的快速出现报告,并将其置于具体背景下进行分析。
我们检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 CINAHL 中在 COVID-19 大流行期间发表的同行评议通讯、信件和文章,评估了个体风湿性疾病患者的用药情况。我们根据 3 种不同的用药问题(即起始用药不当、用药执行不佳和停药)的既定定义评估和报告用药依从性,并使用随机效应模型汇总研究结果。
我们的综合分析纳入了来自不同司法管辖区的 31 项同行评议研究,其中 25 项描述了风湿科患者的用药情况,6 项描述了风湿科医生的用药情况。总体用药不依从的汇总患病率为 14.8%(95%置信区间 [95%CI] 12.3-17.2),停药(即停止处方)和用药执行不佳(即未按规定剂量/频率服药)的患病率分别为 9.5%(95%CI 5.1-14.0)和 9.6%(95%CI 6.2-13.0)。未涉及起始用药不当(即未开始/未开新处方)的情况。
COVID-19 大流行期间,风湿性疾病患者的用药情况在全球范围内存在差异。研究间报告不明确且研究方法存在广泛差异,这给研究复制、比较和推广到特定患者群体带来了障碍。该领域的未来研究应采用一致和透明的方法来定义和衡量用药问题,以确保研究结果恰当地描述用药依从性的流行病学,并有可能确定可改善患者护理的可修改目标。