Meyer Marco, Alfano Mark, de Bruin Boudewijn
Department of Philosophy, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Faculties of Philosophy and of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Rev Philos Psychol. 2021 Jun 25:1-28. doi: 10.1007/s13164-021-00562-5.
This paper presents two studies on the development and validation of a ten-item scale of epistemic vice and the relationship between epistemic vice and misinformation and fake news. Epistemic vices have been defined as character traits that interfere with acquiring, maintaining, and transmitting knowledge. Examples of epistemic vice are gullibility and indifference to knowledge. It has been hypothesized that epistemically vicious people are especially susceptible to misinformation and conspiracy theories. We conducted one exploratory and one confirmatory observational survey study on Amazon Mechanical Turk among people living in the United States (total = 1737). We show that two psychological traits underlie the range of epistemic vices that we investigated: indifference to truth and rigidity. Indifference manifests itself in a lack of motivation to find the truth. Rigidity manifests itself in being insensitive to evidence. We develop a scale to measure epistemic vice with the subscales indifference and rigidity. The Epistemic Vice Scale is internally consistent; has good convergent, divergent, and discriminant validity; and is strongly associated with the endorsement of misinformation and conspiracy theories. Epistemic vice explains additional variance in the endorsement of misinformation and conspiracy theories over and above demographic and related psychological concepts and shows medium to large effect sizes across outcome measures. We demonstrate that epistemic vice differs from existing psychological constructs, and show that the scale can explain individual differences in dealing with misinformation and conspiracy theories. We conclude that epistemic vice might contribute to "postfactive" ways of thinking.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13164-021-00562-5.
本文介绍了两项关于认知恶习十项量表的开发与验证以及认知恶习与错误信息和假新闻之间关系的研究。认知恶习被定义为干扰知识获取、维持和传播的性格特征。认知恶习的例子有轻信和对知识的漠不关心。据推测,认知上有恶习的人特别容易受到错误信息和阴谋论的影响。我们在美国生活的人群中通过亚马逊土耳其机器人平台进行了一项探索性和一项验证性观察调查研究(总计 = 1737人)。我们发现,我们所研究的一系列认知恶习背后有两种心理特征:对真相的漠不关心和僵化。漠不关心表现为缺乏寻求真相的动力。僵化表现为对证据不敏感。我们开发了一个量表来测量认知恶习,该量表有对真相漠不关心和僵化两个子量表。认知恶习量表具有内部一致性;具有良好的聚合效度、区分效度和判别效度;并且与对错误信息和阴谋论的认同密切相关。认知恶习在人口统计学和相关心理概念之外,还解释了对错误信息和阴谋论认同方面的额外差异,并且在各项结果指标上显示出中等到较大的效应量。我们证明认知恶习与现有的心理结构不同,并表明该量表可以解释在处理错误信息和阴谋论方面的个体差异。我们得出结论,认知恶习可能促成“后真相”的思维方式。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s13164-021-00562-5获取的补充材料。