1 Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
2 Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2017 Jun;43(6):793-813. doi: 10.1177/0146167217697695. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
Four studies examined intellectual humility-the degree to which people recognize that their beliefs might be wrong. Using a new Intellectual Humility (IH) Scale, Study 1 showed that intellectual humility was associated with variables related to openness, curiosity, tolerance of ambiguity, and low dogmatism. Study 2 revealed that participants high in intellectual humility were less certain that their beliefs about religion were correct and judged people less on the basis of their religious opinions. In Study 3, participants high in intellectual humility were less inclined to think that politicians who changed their attitudes were "flip-flopping," and Study 4 showed that people high in intellectual humility were more attuned to the strength of persuasive arguments than those who were low. In addition to extending our understanding of intellectual humility, this research demonstrates that the IH Scale is a valid measure of the degree to which people recognize that their beliefs are fallible.
四项研究考察了知识谦逊——即人们认识到自己的信仰可能错误的程度。使用新的知识谦逊(IH)量表,研究 1 表明,知识谦逊与与开放性、好奇心、对模糊性的容忍度和低教条主义有关的变量相关。研究 2 表明,知识谦逊程度较高的参与者不太确定他们对宗教的信仰是正确的,并且较少根据他们的宗教观点来评判他人。在研究 3 中,知识谦逊程度较高的参与者不太倾向于认为改变态度的政治家是“反复无常的”,而研究 4 表明,知识谦逊程度较高的人比那些程度较低的人更能敏锐地意识到有说服力的论点的力度。除了扩展我们对知识谦逊的理解外,这项研究还表明,IH 量表是衡量人们认识到自己的信仰可能存在缺陷的有效尺度。