Erath Alexandra, Shipley Kipp, Walker Louisa Anne, Burrell Erin, Weavind Liza
School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States.
Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Resusc Plus. 2021 Mar 10;6:100102. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100102. eCollection 2021 Jun.
A code status documents the decision to receive or forgo cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the event of cardiac arrest. For patients who undergo a rapid response team activation (RRT) for possible escalation to an intensive care unit (ICU), the presence or absence of a code status represents a critical inflection point for guiding care decisions and resource utilization. This study characterizes the prevalence of code status at the time of RRT and how code status at RRT affects rates of intensive treatments in the ICU.
We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of 895 rapid response activations occurring over six months. The study included all rapid response team activations for non-obstetric adult inpatients documented in the patient chart. All data was obtained through retrospective chart review. STROBE reporting guidelines were followed.
At the time of RRT activation, 56% of patients had a documented code status. Code status prevalence was much higher among medical rather than surgical services (74% vs. 13%). For patients escalated to the ICU, having a DNR code status at RRT was not associated with decreased odds of receiving cardioactive medications or advanced respiratory support. Before RRT activation, palliative care utilization was low (9%) but more than doubled after RRT (24% before discharge).
Barely half of the patients had an active code status at the time of RRT activation. Similar rates of invasive ICU treatments among full code and DNR patients suggest that documented code statuses do not reflect in-depth goals of care discussions, nor does it guide medical teams caring for the patient at times of decompensation.
“抢救状态”文件记录了在心脏骤停时接受或放弃心肺复苏的决定。对于因可能升级到重症监护病房(ICU)而启动快速反应团队(RRT)的患者,“抢救状态”的有无是指导护理决策和资源利用的关键转折点。本研究描述了RRT时“抢救状态”的患病率,以及RRT时的“抢救状态”如何影响ICU中的强化治疗率。
我们对六个月内发生的895次快速反应启动进行了单中心回顾性队列研究。该研究包括患者病历中记录的所有非产科成年住院患者的快速反应团队启动。所有数据均通过回顾性病历审查获得。遵循STROBE报告指南。
在RRT启动时,56%的患者有记录的“抢救状态”。内科服务中的“抢救状态”患病率远高于外科服务(74%对13%)。对于升级到ICU的患者,RRT时具有“不要复苏”(DNR)的“抢救状态”与接受心血管活性药物或高级呼吸支持的几率降低无关。在RRT启动前,姑息治疗的利用率较低(9%),但在RRT后增加了一倍多(出院前为24%)。
在RRT启动时,只有不到一半的患者有有效的“抢救状态”。“完全抢救”和“DNR”患者在ICU进行侵入性治疗的比例相似,这表明记录的“抢救状态”既不能反映深入的护理目标讨论,也不能在患者失代偿时指导医疗团队对患者的护理。