School of Pharmacy, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.
Department of Pharmaceutics & Pharmaceutical Technology, School of Pharmacy, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan.
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2021 Aug;127:112243. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112243. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
An effective delivery vehicle of genetic materials to their target site is the key to a successful gene therapy. In many cases, nanoparticles are used as the vehicle of choice and the efficiency of the delivery relies heavily on the physicochemical properties of the nanoparticles. Microfluidics, although being a low throughput method, has been increasingly researched for the preparation of nanoparticles. A range of superior properties were claimed in the literature for microfluidic-prepared platforms, but no evidence on direct comparison of the properties of the nanoparticles prepared by microfluidics and conventional high throughput method exists, leaving the industry with little guidance on how to select effective large-scale nanoparticle manufacturing method. This study used plasmid DNA-loaded PLGA-Eudragit nanoparticles as the model system to critically compare the nanoparticles prepared by conventional and microfluidics-assisted nanoprecipitation. The PLGA-Eudragit nanoparticles prepared by microfluidics were found to be statistically significantly larger than the ones prepared by conventional nanoprecipitation. PLGA-Eudragit nanoparticle prepared conventionally showed higher DNA loading efficiency. Although the DNA-loaded nanoparticles prepared by both methods did not induce significant cytotoxicity, the transfection efficiency was found to be higher for the ones prepared conventionally which has good potential for plasmid delivery. This study for the first time provides a direct comparison of the DNA-loaded nanoparticles prepared by microfluidic and conventional methods. The findings bring new insights into critical evaluation of the selection of manufacturing methods of nanoparticles for future gene therapy.
有效的基因治疗需要将遗传物质递送到靶位,而这一过程的关键在于选择合适的递药载体。在许多情况下,纳米颗粒被用作首选载体,其递药效率在很大程度上取决于纳米颗粒的物理化学性质。尽管微流控技术的通量较低,但它已被越来越多地用于纳米颗粒的制备研究。文献中声称微流控制备平台具有一系列优异的性能,但目前还没有微流控法和传统高通量方法制备的纳米颗粒性能的直接比较证据,这使得行业在如何选择有效的大规模纳米颗粒制造方法方面几乎没有指导。本研究使用载有质粒 DNA 的 PLGA-Eudragit 纳米颗粒作为模型系统,对传统和微流控辅助相转化法制备的纳米颗粒进行了严格比较。研究发现,与传统纳米沉淀法相比,微流控法制备的 PLGA-Eudragit 纳米颗粒在统计学上显著更大。传统方法制备的 PLGA-Eudragit 纳米颗粒具有更高的 DNA 载量效率。尽管两种方法制备的载 DNA 纳米颗粒均未引起明显的细胞毒性,但发现传统方法制备的转染效率更高,这对于质粒的传递具有很好的应用潜力。本研究首次对微流控法和传统方法制备的载 DNA 纳米颗粒进行了直接比较。这些发现为未来基因治疗中纳米颗粒制造方法的选择提供了新的见解。