Centre for Implementation Science, Health Services and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, David Goldberg Centre, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK.
Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, University of Witwatersrand, 60 York Road, 2193 Johannesburg, South Africa.
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Nov 11;36(10):1644-1658. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab076.
Strong leadership capabilities are essential for effective health services, yet definitions of leadership remain contested. Despite the acknowledged contextual specificity of leadership styles, most leadership theories draw heavily from Western conceptualizations. This cultural bias may attenuate the effectiveness of programmes intended to transform healthcare practice in Sub-Saharan Africa, where few empirical studies on health leadership have been conducted. This paper examines how effective leadership by doctors was perceived by stakeholders in one particular context, Sierra Leone. Drawing together extensive experience of in-country healthcare provision with a series of in-depth interviews with 27 Sierra Leonean doctors, we extended a grounded-theory approach to come to grips with the reach and relevance of contemporary leadership models in capturing the local experiences and relevance of leadership. We found that participants conceptualized leadership according to established leadership models, such as transformational and relational theories. However, participants also pointed to distinctive challenges attendant to healthcare provision in Sierra Leone that required specific leadership capabilities. Context-specific factors included health system breakdown, politicization in the health sector and lack of accountability, placing importance on skills such as persistence, role modelling and taking initiative. Participants also described pressure to behave in ways they deemed antithetical to their personal and professional values and also necessary in order to continue a career in the public sector. The challenge of navigating such ethical dilemmas was a defining feature of leadership in Sierra Leone. Our research demonstrates that while international leadership models were relevant in this context, there is strong emphasis on contingent or situational leadership theories. We further contribute to policy and practice by informing design of leadership development programmes and the establishment of a more enabling environment for medical leadership by governments and international donors.
强有力的领导能力对于有效的卫生服务至关重要,但领导的定义仍然存在争议。尽管领导风格的公认背景特异性,但大多数领导理论都大量借鉴了西方概念化。这种文化偏见可能会降低旨在改变撒哈拉以南非洲地区医疗保健实践的计划的有效性,因为在那里很少有关于卫生领导的实证研究。本文考察了在一个特定背景下,即塞拉利昂,医生的有效领导是如何被利益相关者感知的。通过将在国内医疗服务方面的广泛经验与对 27 名塞拉利昂医生的一系列深入访谈相结合,我们扩展了扎根理论方法,以掌握当代领导模式在捕捉当地领导经验和相关性方面的影响力和相关性。我们发现,参与者根据既定的领导模式来概念化领导,例如变革型和关系型理论。然而,参与者也指出了塞拉利昂医疗服务中存在的独特挑战,这些挑战需要特定的领导能力。具体的背景因素包括卫生系统崩溃、卫生部门的政治化和缺乏问责制,这使得毅力、树立榜样和主动行动等技能变得重要。参与者还描述了在公共部门继续职业生涯时,他们不得不以被认为与个人和职业价值观相悖的方式行事的压力。驾驭这种道德困境的挑战是塞拉利昂领导力的一个决定性特征。我们的研究表明,虽然国际领导模式在这种情况下是相关的,但对权变或情境领导理论的强调很强。我们通过为政府和国际捐助者设计领导力发展计划以及为医学领导力建立更有利的环境提供信息,进一步为政策和实践做出了贡献。