• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外科手术或经导管主动脉瓣置换术后未来冠状动脉通路的需求。

The need for future coronary access following surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

作者信息

Hermiller James B, Gunnarsson Candace L, Ryan Michael P, Moore Kimberly A, Clancy Seth J, Irish William

机构信息

Deptartment of Cardiology, Ascension St. Vincent's Heart Center of Indiana, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Gunnarsson Consulting, Jupiter, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Nov 1;98(5):950-956. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29841. Epub 2021 Jul 6.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.29841
PMID:34227736
Abstract

The aim of the study was to estimate the percentage of Medicare patients needing coronary access for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary angiography following aortic valve replacement (AVR). Indications for TAVR have expanded to include younger and low-risk patients, raising the question of coronary access for future procedures. Medicare patients <80 years old with an AVR between 2011 and 2018 were included. Time-to-event analyses were conducted using Cox hazard models to estimate risk of coronary access up to 7 years after AVR. Model adjustments included age, sex, race, region, comorbidity, concomitant CABG, and smoking. A total of 13,469 Medicare patients (mean age 70.6) met inclusion criteria. Models estimated that 2.5% of patients at 1-year post-index and 17% at over 7 years would need coronary access. For patients who had SAVR (with or without CABG), estimates for coronary access were similar and over 15% after 6.5 years. For TAVR patients, with a previous PCI, 28% at 4.5 years required coronary access, which was higher than TAVR patients without a previous PCI. SAVR patients with and without CAD at baseline were similar; however, TAVR patients with CAD had a 22% rate of coronary access versus 7% for those without at 3 years. Approximately half of patients who needed coronary access returned to the same hospital as their initial AVR. Coronary access is required in a substantial portion of AVR patients especially those with PCI or a history of CAD undergoing TAVR. The need for coronary access may increase as transcatheter AVR becomes accessible to younger patients with a longer life expectancy.

摘要

本研究的目的是估计在主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)后需要进行冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)或冠状动脉造影的医疗保险患者的比例。经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)的适应症已扩大到包括年轻和低风险患者,这引发了未来手术中冠状动脉通路的问题。纳入了2011年至2018年间年龄小于80岁且接受AVR的医疗保险患者。使用Cox风险模型进行事件发生时间分析,以估计AVR后长达7年的冠状动脉通路风险。模型调整包括年龄、性别、种族、地区、合并症、同期冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)和吸烟情况。共有13469名医疗保险患者(平均年龄70.6岁)符合纳入标准。模型估计,索引后1年有2.5%的患者以及7年以上有17%的患者需要冠状动脉通路。对于接受外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR,无论是否同期CABG)的患者,冠状动脉通路的估计情况相似,6.5年后超过15%。对于既往有PCI的TAVR患者,4.5年时有28%需要冠状动脉通路,这高于既往无PCI的TAVR患者。基线时有CAD和无CAD的SAVR患者情况相似;然而,有CAD的TAVR患者在3年时冠状动脉通路发生率为22%,而无CAD的患者为7%。大约一半需要冠状动脉通路的患者回到了他们最初接受AVR的同一家医院。很大一部分AVR患者需要冠状动脉通路,尤其是那些接受PCI或有CAD病史且接受TAVR的患者。随着预期寿命较长的年轻患者能够接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术,冠状动脉通路的需求可能会增加。

相似文献

1
The need for future coronary access following surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement.外科手术或经导管主动脉瓣置换术后未来冠状动脉通路的需求。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Nov 1;98(5):950-956. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29841. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
2
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement- management of patients with significant coronary artery disease undergoing aortic valve interventions: surgical compared to catheter-based approaches in hybrid procedures.经导管主动脉瓣置换术- 主动脉瓣介入治疗中合并严重冠状动脉疾病患者的管理:杂交手术中经导管与外科手术方法的比较。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 May 14;19(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1087-2.
3
Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Complex Coronary Artery Disease.复杂冠状动脉疾病患者经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Nov 22;14(22):2490-2499. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.08.073.
4
Coronary revascularization during treatment of severe aortic stenosis: A meta-analysis of the complete percutaneous approach (PCI plus TAVR) versus the complete surgical approach (CABG plus SAVR).重度主动脉瓣狭窄治疗期间的冠状动脉血运重建:完全经皮入路(PCI加TAVR)与完全手术入路(CABG加SAVR)的荟萃分析
J Card Surg. 2020 Aug;35(8):2009-2016. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14814. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
5
Surgical versus Interventional Treatment of Concomitant Aortic Valve Stenosis and Coronary Artery Disease.手术治疗与介入治疗伴发主动脉瓣狭窄和冠状动脉疾病。
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Dec;71(8):620-631. doi: 10.1055/a-2003-2105. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
6
Impact of coronary artery disease and percutaneous coronary intervention in women undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: From the WIN-TAVI registry.冠心病及经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术女性患者的影响:来自WIN-TAVI注册研究
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 May 1;93(6):1124-1131. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28012. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
7
Trends and outcomes of combined percutaneous (TAVI+PCI) and surgical approach (SAVR+CABG) for patients with aortic valve and coronary artery disease: A National Readmission Database (NRD) analysis.主动脉瓣和冠状动脉疾病患者行经皮(TAVI+PCI)和外科联合治疗(SAVR+CABG)的趋势和结果:国家再入院数据库(NRD)分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Nov;102(5):946-957. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30832. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
8
Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Prior Cardiac Surgery in the Randomized PARTNER 2A Trial.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术在随机 PARTNER 2A 试验中既往心脏手术患者中的比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Nov 12;11(21):2207-2216. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
9
Increasing Wait-Time Mortality for Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Population-Level Study of the Transition in Practice From Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者等待时间导致的死亡率增加:一项关于从外科主动脉瓣置换术到经导管主动脉瓣置换术实践转变的人群水平研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov;13(11):e009297. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009297. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
10
Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement With Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术联合外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗主动脉瓣置换术的结果。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Dec 15;137:83-88. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.09.040. Epub 2020 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
The need for future coronary access in older medicare beneficiaries following transcatheter aortic-valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后老年医疗保险受益人群未来冠状动脉介入治疗的必要性。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2025 Jul 18. doi: 10.1007/s12928-025-01171-0.