Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanjing Lishui People's Hospital, Nanjing City, China.
Department of Infectious Diseases, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, 4th Medical College of Peking University, Beijing, China.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021 Aug 17;65(9):e0069821. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00698-21.
Bloodstream infections (BSIs) attributable to carbapenem-resistant (CRE-BSIs) are dangerous and a major cause of mortality in clinical settings. This study was therefore designed to define risk factors linked to 30-day mortality in CRE-BSI patients and to examine the relative efficacies of different antimicrobial treatment regimens in affected individuals. Data pertaining to 187 CRE-BSI cases from four teaching hospitals in China collected between January 2018 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. For the 187 patients analyzed in this study, the 30-day mortality of CRE-BSI was 41.7% (78/187). Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that Pitt bacteremia score, immunocompromised status, meropenem MIC of ≥8 mg/liter,absence of source control of infection, and appropriate empirical therapy were independent predictors of CRE-BSI patient 30-day mortality. After controlling for potential confounding factors relative to ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) treatment, combination therapies including CAZ-AVI (odds ratio [OR], 1.287; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.124 to 13.403; = 0.833) were not related to any significant change in patient mortality risk, whereas the 30-day mortality risk was higher for patients administered other antimicrobial regimens (OR, 12.407; 95% CI, 1.684 to 31.430; = 0.011). When patients were treated with antimicrobial regimens not containing CAZ-AVI, combination therapy (OR, 0.239; 95% CI, 0.077 to 0.741; = 0.013) was related to a decreased 30-day mortality risk relative to monotherapy treatment. The mortality-related risk factors and relative antimicrobial regimen efficacy data demonstrated in this study may guide the management of CRE-BSI patients.
血流感染(BSIs)归因于碳青霉烯类耐药(CRE-BSIs)是临床环境中危险且主要的死亡原因。因此,本研究旨在确定与 CRE-BSI 患者 30 天死亡率相关的危险因素,并研究不同抗菌治疗方案在受影响个体中的相对疗效。本研究回顾性分析了 2018 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间中国四家教学医院的 187 例 CRE-BSI 病例的数据。在本研究分析的 187 例患者中,CRE-BSI 的 30 天死亡率为 41.7%(78/187)。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,Pitt 菌血症评分、免疫功能低下状态、美罗培南 MIC 为≥8mg/L、无感染源控制和适当的经验性治疗是 CRE-BSI 患者 30 天死亡率的独立预测因素。在控制了与头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CAZ-AVI)治疗相关的潜在混杂因素后,包括 CAZ-AVI 的联合治疗(比值比 [OR],1.287;95%置信区间 [CI],0.124 至 13.403; = 0.833)与患者死亡率风险无显著变化相关,而接受其他抗菌治疗方案的患者 30 天死亡率更高(OR,12.407;95% CI,1.684 至 31.430; = 0.011)。当患者接受不包含 CAZ-AVI 的抗菌治疗方案时,联合治疗(OR,0.239;95% CI,0.077 至 0.741; = 0.013)与降低 30 天死亡率风险相关。本研究中显示的与死亡率相关的危险因素和相对抗菌方案疗效数据可能指导 CRE-BSI 患者的管理。