Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Belgium.
Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Epinière, ICM, Inserm U 1127, CNRS, UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, F-75013, Paris France; AP-HP, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Service de Psychiatrie d'Adultes, F-75013, Paris, France.
J Affect Disord. 2021 Oct 1;293:347-354. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.06.051. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
Aberrant DMN connectivity and activity have been robustly linked to Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and risk for depression. This link has mostly been explained in terms of rumination, a form of negative, repetitive cognitive processing. Yet, accumulating findings are indicating altered DMN dynamics during emotional processing in MDD, pointing at a potential emotion-related DMN pathology in depression linked to inflexibly sustained emotional responses. Such a link might be especially important in understanding risk of depression. However, whether inflexible emotional processing (i.e. emotional inertia) is connecting aberrant DMN organization to risk of depression as well as how this might relate to rumination remains unclear. Addressing this gap, 34 participants underwent a resting-state fMRI and a 7-day Experience Sampling phase. Using regression and multiple mediation analysis we investigated the relations between negative emotional inertia, rumination, DMN organization and risk of depression as indicated by high subclinical depressive symptoms. The findings indicated that DMN efficiency at rest was positively associated with depressive symptoms and risk of depression. Both negative emotional inertia in daily life and rumination were independently mediating this relationship. While negative emotional inertia was connected to a broad increase in the coupling of DMN regions, rumination was only related to an increase in node strength of the dorsomedial Prefrontal Cortex. These findings are pointing towards an emotional-related DMN pathology contributing to risk of depression. Furthermore the findings are indicating that this relationship is independent from the rumination-related link between the DMN and depression - representing different aspects of DMN organization.
异常的 DMN 连接和活动与重度抑郁症(MDD)和抑郁风险密切相关。这种联系主要是通过沉思来解释的,沉思是一种消极的、重复的认知处理方式。然而,越来越多的发现表明,在 MDD 中进行情绪处理时,DMN 的动态发生了改变,这表明抑郁与情绪相关的 DMN 病理学可能与情绪反应的僵化持续有关。这种联系在理解抑郁风险方面可能尤为重要。然而,僵化的情绪处理(即情绪惯性)是否将异常的 DMN 组织与抑郁风险联系起来,以及这种联系如何与沉思相关,目前尚不清楚。为了填补这一空白,34 名参与者接受了静息态 fMRI 和为期 7 天的体验采样阶段。我们使用回归和多重中介分析,研究了消极情绪惯性、沉思、DMN 组织与高亚临床抑郁症状所指示的抑郁风险之间的关系。研究结果表明,静息状态下 DMN 的效率与抑郁症状和抑郁风险呈正相关。日常生活中的消极情绪惯性和沉思都独立地介导了这种关系。虽然消极情绪惯性与 DMN 区域耦合的广泛增加有关,但沉思只与背内侧前额叶皮层的节点强度增加有关。这些发现表明,情绪相关的 DMN 病理学可能导致抑郁风险。此外,研究结果表明,这种关系独立于 DMN 与抑郁之间与沉思相关的联系,代表了 DMN 组织的不同方面。