Zisser Mackenzie, Shumake Jason, Beevers Christopher G
Mood Disorders Laboratory, Institute of Mental Health Research, University of Texas at Austin, 108 E Dean Keeton St, Austin, TX 78712 USA.
Affect Sci. 2024 Aug 3;5(3):259-272. doi: 10.1007/s42761-024-00249-x. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Emotion dynamics have demonstrated mixed ability to predict depressive symptoms and outperform traditional metrics like the mean and standard deviation of emotion reports. Here, we expand the types of emotion dynamic features used in prior work and apply a machine learning algorithm to predict depression symptoms. We obtained seven ecological momentary assessment (EMA) studies from previous work on depression and emotion dynamics ( = 890). These studies measured self-reported sadness, positive affect, and negative affect 5 to 10 times per day for 7 to 21 days (schedule varied across studies). These data were fed through a feature extraction routine to generate hundreds of emotion dynamic features. A gradient boosting machine (GBM) using all available emotion dynamics features was the best of all models assessed. This model's out-of-sample prediction ( ) for depression severity ranged from .20 to .44 depending on EMA interpolation method and samples included in the analysis. It also explained significantly more variance than a benchmark model of individuals' mean emotion ratings over the assessment period, = .089. Comprehensive feature mining of emotion dynamics obtained during EMA may be necessary to identify processes that predict depression symptoms beyond mean emotion ratings.
情绪动态在预测抑郁症状方面表现出参差不齐的能力,并且优于诸如情绪报告的均值和标准差等传统指标。在此,我们扩展了先前研究中使用的情绪动态特征类型,并应用机器学习算法来预测抑郁症状。我们从先前关于抑郁和情绪动态的研究中获取了七项生态瞬时评估(EMA)研究( = 890)。这些研究在7至21天内每天测量自我报告的悲伤、积极情绪和消极情绪5至10次(各研究的时间表不同)。这些数据通过一个特征提取程序来生成数百个情绪动态特征。使用所有可用情绪动态特征的梯度提升机(GBM)是所有评估模型中表现最佳的。根据EMA插值方法和分析中包含的样本,该模型对抑郁严重程度的样本外预测( )范围为0.20至0.44。它还比个体在评估期间的平均情绪评分基准模型解释了显著更多的方差, = 0.089。对EMA期间获得的情绪动态进行全面的特征挖掘,对于识别除平均情绪评分之外预测抑郁症状的过程可能是必要的。