• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

COVID-19 临床研究中对性别因素的考虑不足。

Lack of consideration of sex and gender in COVID-19 clinical studies.

机构信息

Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Department of Sociology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Nat Commun. 2021 Jul 6;12(1):4015. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24265-8.

DOI:10.1038/s41467-021-24265-8
PMID:34230477
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8260641/
Abstract

Sex and gender differences impact the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 mortality. Furthermore, sex differences influence the frequency and severity of pharmacological side effects. A large number of clinical trials to develop new therapeutic approaches and vaccines for COVID-19 are ongoing. We investigated the inclusion of sex and/or gender in COVID-19 studies on ClinicalTrials.gov, collecting data for the period January 1, 2020 to January 26, 2021. Here, we show that of the 4,420 registered SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 studies, 935 (21.2%) address sex/gender solely in the context of recruitment, 237 (5.4%) plan sex-matched or representative samples or emphasized sex/gender reporting, and only 178 (4%) explicitly report a plan to include sex/gender as an analytical variable. Just eight (17.8%) of the 45 COVID-19 related clinical trials published in scientific journals until December 15, 2020 report sex-disaggregated results or subgroup analyses.

摘要

性别差异会影响 SARS-CoV-2 感染的发生率和 COVID-19 的死亡率。此外,性别差异还会影响药物副作用的发生频率和严重程度。目前有大量针对 COVID-19 的临床试验正在进行,旨在开发新的治疗方法和疫苗。我们调查了 ClinicalTrials.gov 上的 COVID-19 研究中是否纳入了性别因素,数据收集时间为 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 1 月 26 日。结果显示,在已注册的 4420 项与 SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 相关的研究中,935 项(21.2%)仅在招募阶段考虑了性别因素,237 项(5.4%)计划进行性别匹配或有代表性的样本研究,或强调性别报告,仅有 178 项(4%)明确表示将性别作为分析变量纳入研究计划。截至 2020 年 12 月 15 日,在已发表的与 COVID-19 相关的临床试验中,仅有 8 项(17.8%)报告了按性别分类的结果或亚组分析。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e0a/8260641/1af752d2a84f/41467_2021_24265_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e0a/8260641/fc0c766271aa/41467_2021_24265_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e0a/8260641/1af752d2a84f/41467_2021_24265_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e0a/8260641/fc0c766271aa/41467_2021_24265_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e0a/8260641/1af752d2a84f/41467_2021_24265_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Lack of consideration of sex and gender in COVID-19 clinical studies.COVID-19 临床研究中对性别因素的考虑不足。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jul 6;12(1):4015. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24265-8.
2
Evidence of Gender Differences in the Diagnosis and Management of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients: An Analysis of Electronic Health Records Using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning.使用自然语言处理和机器学习分析电子健康记录,发现 2019 年冠状病毒病患者诊断和管理中的性别差异证据。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021 Mar;30(3):393-404. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8721. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
3
Sex- or Gender-specific Differences in the Clinical Presentation, Outcome, and Treatment of SARS-CoV-2.SARS-CoV-2 在临床表现、转归和治疗方面的性别差异。
Clin Ther. 2021 Mar;43(3):557-571.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.01.015. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
4
Gender-related sociocultural differences and COVID-19: what influence on the effects of the pandemic?性别相关的社会文化差异与 COVID-19:对大流行影响有何作用?
Epidemiol Prev. 2020 Sep-Dec;44(5-6 Suppl 2):398-399. doi: 10.19191/EP20.5-6.S2.144.
5
Effect of early treatment with polyvalent immunoglobulin on acute respiratory distress syndrome associated with SARS-CoV-2 infections (ICAR trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.多价免疫球蛋白早期治疗对 SARS-CoV-2 感染相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征的影响(ICAR 试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Feb 28;22(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05118-7.
6
SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 in patients on the Swiss national transplant waiting list.瑞士全国移植等待名单上的 SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 患者。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2020 Dec 31;150:w20451. doi: 10.4414/smw.2020.20451. eCollection 2020 Dec 14.
7
Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in COVID-19: study protocol for a global registry of women with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy and their neonates, understanding natural history to guide treatment and prevention.COVID-19 孕妇和新生儿结局研究:一项全球疑似或确诊 SARS-CoV-2 感染孕妇及其新生儿注册研究方案,旨在了解自然史以指导治疗和预防。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 29;11(1):e041247. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041247.
8
[Sex/gender differences in COVID-19 lethality: what the data say, and do not say].[新冠病毒病致死率中的性别差异:数据所表明及未表明的情况]
Epidemiol Prev. 2020 Sep-Dec;44(5-6 Suppl 2):400-406. doi: 10.19191/EP20.5-6.S2.145.
9
Hormonal intervention for the treatment of veterans with COVID-19 requiring hospitalization (HITCH): a multicenter, phase 2 randomized controlled trial of best supportive care vs best supportive care plus degarelix: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.针对需要住院治疗的 COVID-19 退伍军人的激素干预(HITCH):一项多中心、2 期随机对照试验,比较最佳支持治疗与最佳支持治疗加地加瑞克:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Jul 5;22(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05389-0.
10
Mortality in COVID-19: Further Evidence for a Sex-Based Difference in the OpenSAFELY Study.COVID-19 死亡率:来自 OpenSAFELY 研究的进一步性别差异证据。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021 Jan;30(1):61-63. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8777. Epub 2020 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Drosophila melanogaster as a model organism to investigate sex specific differences.黑腹果蝇作为一种用于研究性别特异性差异的模式生物。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 4;15(1):19648. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04497-0.
2
SARS-CoV-2 infection risk by non-healthcare occupations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.非医疗职业的新冠病毒感染风险:一项系统综述与荟萃分析
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2025 May 22;20(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12995-025-00462-9.
3
Sex-related differences in the association between migraine, COVID-19, and long COVID: a population-based cohort.

本文引用的文献

1
Covid-19: US suspends Johnson and Johnson vaccine rollout over blood clots.新冠疫情:美国因血栓问题暂停强生疫苗接种计划。
BMJ. 2021 Apr 13;373:n970. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n970.
2
Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia after ChAdOx1 nCov-19 Vaccination.接种 ChAdOx1 nCov-19 疫苗后发生血栓性血小板减少症。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 3;384(22):2092-2101. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2104840. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
3
Poverty, health, and covid-19.贫困、健康与新冠疫情
偏头痛、新冠病毒病和新冠后状况之间关联的性别差异:一项基于人群的队列研究
Front Neurol. 2025 Mar 21;16:1547893. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1547893. eCollection 2025.
4
Why gender and sex matter in infectious disease modelling: A conceptual framework.为何性别和性征在传染病建模中至关重要:一个概念框架
SSM Popul Health. 2025 Mar 12;30:101775. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101775. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Expanding the women's health paradigm beyond reproductive boundaries.将女性健康范式扩展至生殖范畴之外。
Indian J Med Res. 2025 Jan;161(1):38-42. doi: 10.25259/IJMR_1428_2024.
6
Evaluating Covid-19 publications for sex and gender-specific health content: A bibliometric analysis.评估关于新冠病毒病(Covid-19)的出版物中的性别特异性健康内容:一项文献计量分析。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 19;20(2):e0316812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316812. eCollection 2025.
7
The impact of sex/gender-specific funding and editorial policies on biomedical research outcomes: a cross-national analysis (2000-2021).性别特定资金和编辑政策对生物医学研究成果的影响:跨国分析(2000-2021 年)。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 4;14(1):26599. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77018-0.
8
Gender sensitivity of the COVID-19 mental health research in Europe: a scoping review.欧洲 COVID-19 心理健康研究的性别敏感性:范围综述。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Oct 10;23(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02286-1.
9
Handgrip strength as a prognostic factor for COVID-19 mortality among older adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU): a comparison Alpha (B.1.1.7) and Delta (B.1.617.2) variants.握力作为入住重症监护病房(ICU)老年患者 COVID-19 死亡率的预后因素:Alpha(B.1.1.7)和 Delta(B.1.617.2)变异株的比较。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 27;14(1):19927. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71034-w.
10
Menopause symptom prevalence in three post-COVID-19 syndrome clinics in England: A cross-sectional analysis.英国三家新冠后综合征诊所的更年期症状患病率:一项横断面分析。
IJID Reg. 2024 Jul 15;12:100405. doi: 10.1016/j.ijregi.2024.100405. eCollection 2024 Sep.
BMJ. 2021 Feb 12;372:n376. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n376.
4
Reports of Anaphylaxis After Receipt of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines in the US-December 14, 2020-January 18, 2021.2020年12月14日至2021年1月18日美国接种mRNA新冠疫苗后发生过敏反应的报告
JAMA. 2021 Mar 16;325(11):1101-1102. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.1967.
5
Covid-19 pandemic and the social determinants of health.Covid-19 大流行与健康的社会决定因素。
BMJ. 2021 Jan 28;372:n129. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n129.
6
Sex differences in immune responses.免疫反应中的性别差异。
Science. 2021 Jan 22;371(6527):347-348. doi: 10.1126/science.abe7199.
7
Sex differences in susceptibility, severity, and outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019: Cross-sectional analysis from a diverse US metropolitan area.性别差异在 2019 冠状病毒病的易感性、严重程度和结局中的作用:来自美国多元化大都市地区的横断面分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 13;16(1):e0245556. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245556. eCollection 2021.
8
Sex differences in clinical phenotype and transitions of care among individuals dying of COVID-19 in Italy.意大利因 COVID-19 死亡的人群中,临床表型和医疗照护过渡方面的性别差异。
Biol Sex Differ. 2020 Oct 16;11(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13293-020-00334-3.
9
Coronavirus disease 2019 and gender-related mortality in European countries: A meta-analysis.2019 年冠状病毒病与欧洲国家的性别相关死亡率:一项荟萃分析。
Maturitas. 2020 Nov;141:59-62. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.06.017. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
10
Sex difference in coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a systematic review and meta-analysis.性别差异在冠状病毒病(COVID-19)中的作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 6;10(10):e040129. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040129.