• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗流感药物使用与过敏反应的相关性:基于日本不良药物事件报告数据库的分析。

Association between anaphylaxis and anti-influenza drug use: An analysis of the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database.

机构信息

Department of Practical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Toho University, Chiba, Japan.

Center for Experiential Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Drug Discov Ther. 2021;15(3):150-155. doi: 10.5582/ddt.2021.01053.

DOI:10.5582/ddt.2021.01053
PMID:34234064
Abstract

We aimed to investigate the association between anaphylaxis and anti-influenza drug use using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database, a national spontaneous reporting database in Japan. We surveyed registered cases from the JADER database between April 2004 and November 2019. The target drugs were five anti-influenza drugs, namely oseltamivir, zanamivir, peramivir, laninamivir, and baloxavir. Adverse events associated with anaphylaxis, "anaphylactic reaction," "anaphylactic shock," "anaphylactoid reaction," and "anaphylactoid shock," were evaluated. The association between anaphylaxis and anti-influenza drug use was assessed by calculating the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and information component (IC) as a measure of disproportionality. Signals were considered positive if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of ROR was > 1, and that of IC was > 0. The number of anaphylaxis cases associated with anti-influenza drug use was 199 (0.9%). Signals were detected for inhaled laninamivir (ROR: 4.24 [95% CI: 3.06-5.88], IC: 1.83 [1.35-2.30]), intravenous peramivir (ROR: 2.97 [2.11-4.17], IC: 1.40 [0.90-1.89]), and oral baloxavir (ROR: 3.05 [2.22-4.18], IC: 1.44 [0.98-1.90]). Conversely, signals were not detected for oral oseltamivir or inhaled zanamivir. Although zanamivir and laninamivir were used as dry powder inhalers containing lactose as an additive, they differed in terms of signal detection. Our analysis indicated that the signal of anaphylaxis may varies based on the main component or dosage form of each anti-influenza drug. Appropriate use of these drugs is essential to prevent anaphylaxis and improve health status.

摘要

我们旨在使用日本不良反应事件报告(JADER)数据库,这是日本的一个全国性自发报告数据库,研究过敏反应与抗流感药物使用之间的关联。我们调查了 2004 年 4 月至 2019 年 11 月期间 JADER 数据库中登记的病例。目标药物为五种抗流感药物,即奥司他韦、扎那米韦、帕拉米韦、拉尼米韦和巴洛沙韦。评估了与过敏反应相关的不良反应事件,包括“过敏反应”、“过敏性休克”、“类过敏反应”和“类过敏反应性休克”。通过计算报告比值比(ROR)和信息分量(IC)来评估过敏反应与抗流感药物使用之间的关联,作为不成比例性的度量。如果 ROR 的 95%置信区间(CI)下限>1,并且 IC 的下限>0,则认为信号为阳性。与抗流感药物使用相关的过敏反应病例数为 199 例(0.9%)。检测到吸入用拉尼米韦(ROR:4.24 [95% CI:3.06-5.88],IC:1.83 [1.35-2.30])、静脉用帕拉米韦(ROR:2.97 [2.11-4.17],IC:1.40 [0.90-1.89])和口服巴洛沙韦(ROR:3.05 [2.22-4.18],IC:1.44 [0.98-1.90])的信号。相反,口服奥司他韦或吸入用扎那米韦未检测到信号。尽管扎那米韦和拉尼米韦都作为含有乳糖作为添加剂的干粉吸入剂使用,但它们在信号检测方面存在差异。我们的分析表明,过敏反应的信号可能因每种抗流感药物的主要成分或剂型而异。这些药物的合理使用对于预防过敏反应和改善健康状况至关重要。

相似文献

1
Association between anaphylaxis and anti-influenza drug use: An analysis of the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database.抗流感药物使用与过敏反应的相关性:基于日本不良药物事件报告数据库的分析。
Drug Discov Ther. 2021;15(3):150-155. doi: 10.5582/ddt.2021.01053.
2
Antiviral influenza treatments and hemorrhage-related adverse events in the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库中抗流感病毒治疗与出血相关不良事件。
Pharmacotherapy. 2024 May;44(5):383-393. doi: 10.1002/phar.2920. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
3
Assessment of adverse events related to anti-influenza neuraminidase inhibitors using the FDA adverse event reporting system and online patient reviews.使用 FDA 不良事件报告系统和在线患者评论评估与抗流感神经氨酸酶抑制剂相关的不良事件。
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 20;10(1):3116. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60068-5.
4
Safety analysis of Oseltamivir and Baloxavir Marboxil after market approval: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system.奥司他韦和玛巴洛沙韦上市后的安全性分析:基于 FDA 不良事件报告系统的药物警戒研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 May 9;24(1):446. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09339-4.
5
Comparison of the incidence of bleeding between baloxavir marboxil and other anti-influenza drugs among outpatients with influenza virus infection: A retrospective cohort study using an employment-based health insurance claims database in Japan.比较巴洛沙韦与其他抗流感药物在日本以就业为基础的医疗保险理赔数据库中门诊流感病毒感染患者出血发生率的一项回顾性队列研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2022 Jun;31(6):623-631. doi: 10.1002/pds.5392. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
6
Cost-effectiveness of baloxavir marboxil compared to laninamivir for the treatment of influenza in Japan.巴洛沙韦玛比酯与拉尼那韦治疗日本流感的成本效益比较。
J Infect Chemother. 2021 Feb;27(2):296-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2020.10.018. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
7
Detection of a Peramivir-Resistant Influenza B/Yamagata-Lineage Virus Imported from Indonesia in Aichi, Japan, March 2019.2019年3月在日本爱知县检测到一株从印度尼西亚输入的对帕拉米韦耐药的乙型/山形系流感病毒。
Jpn J Infect Dis. 2020 Sep 24;73(5):386-390. doi: 10.7883/yoken.JJID.2020.084. Epub 2020 May 29.
8
Efficacy and safety of baloxavir marboxil versus neuraminidase inhibitors in the treatment of influenza virus infection in high-risk and uncomplicated patients - a Bayesian network meta-analysis.巴洛沙韦酯与神经氨酸酶抑制剂治疗高危和非复杂性流感病毒感染患者的疗效与安全性——一项贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 Feb;37(2):225-244. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1839400. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
9
Safety and effectiveness of baloxavir marboxil for the treatment of influenza in Japanese clinical practice: A postmarketing surveillance of more than 3000 patients.在日本临床实践中,巴洛沙韦治疗流感的安全性和有效性:超过 3000 例患者的上市后监测。
J Infect Chemother. 2020 Jul;26(7):729-735. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2020.04.014. Epub 2020 May 12.
10
Cost-effectiveness of baloxavir marboxil compared with laninamivir for the treatment of influenza in patients at high risk for complications in Japan.巴洛沙韦与拉尼那韦治疗日本流感并发症高危患者的成本效益比较。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 Jul;37(7):1135-1148. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1914942. Epub 2021 May 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety evaluation of baloxavir marboxil: analysis and discussion utilizing real adverse events from the FAERS database.玛巴洛沙韦的安全性评估:利用来自FAERS数据库的真实不良事件进行分析与讨论
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2025 May 26;26(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s40360-025-00940-0.
2
Developing an AI-based prediction model for anaphylactic shock from injection drugs using Japanese real-world data and chemical structure-based analysis.利用日本真实世界数据和基于化学结构的分析开发用于注射药物过敏反应的人工智能预测模型。
Daru. 2024 Jun;32(1):253-262. doi: 10.1007/s40199-024-00511-4. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
3
Cytomegalovirus Occurrence and Time-to-onset Analysis Under Bendamustine With Anti-CD20 Antibodies Using the JADER Database.
基于 JADER 数据库的苯达莫司汀联合抗 CD20 抗体的细胞巨化病毒发生率和发病时间分析。
In Vivo. 2024 Mar-Apr;38(2):923-927. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13520.
4
Hypoxia-inducible Factor Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitors and Hypothyroidism: An Analysis of the Japanese Pharmacovigilance Database.缺氧诱导因子脯氨酰羟化酶抑制剂与甲状腺功能减退症:日本药物警戒数据库分析。
In Vivo. 2024 Mar-Apr;38(2):917-922. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13519.
5
COVID-19 mRNA vaccination is associated with IgA nephropathy: an analysis of the Japanese adverse drug event report database.COVID-19 mRNA 疫苗接种与 IgA 肾病相关:来自日本不良药物事件报告数据库的分析。
J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2023 Jun 30;26:11453. doi: 10.3389/jpps.2023.11453. eCollection 2023.
6
Occurrence of intraocular hemorrhages under monotherapy or combination therapy of antiplatelets and anticoagulants using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database.日本药物不良反应报告数据库中单药或联合抗血小板和抗凝治疗时出现的眼内出血。
J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2023 Apr 12;26:11263. doi: 10.3389/jpps.2023.11263. eCollection 2023.
7
A pharmacovigilance approach for assessing the occurrence of suicide-related events induced by antiepileptic drugs using the Japanese adverse drug event report database.利用日本药品不良事件报告数据库,采用药物警戒方法评估抗癫痫药物诱发的自杀相关事件的发生情况。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jan 9;13:1091386. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1091386. eCollection 2022.