• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用日本真实世界数据和基于化学结构的分析开发用于注射药物过敏反应的人工智能预测模型。

Developing an AI-based prediction model for anaphylactic shock from injection drugs using Japanese real-world data and chemical structure-based analysis.

机构信息

Laboratory of Pharmacoinformatics, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Suzuka University of Medical Science, 3500-3 Minamitamagakichō, Suzuka, Mie Prefecture, 513-8670, Japan.

出版信息

Daru. 2024 Jun;32(1):253-262. doi: 10.1007/s40199-024-00511-4. Epub 2024 Apr 5.

DOI:10.1007/s40199-024-00511-4
PMID:38580799
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11087410/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aims to develop an AI-based prediction model for injection drugs that cause anaphylactic shock using Japanese Real-World Data (JADER database) and chemical structure-based analysis.

METHODS

Data sourced from the JADER database included adverse drug reaction reports from April 2004 to December 2020. Only drugs with an adverse reaction named "anaphylactic shock" were selected for analysis. For model building, various models were constructed to predict anaphylactic shock-inducing drugs, such as logistic regression, LASSO, XGBoost, RF, SVM, and NNW. These models used chemical properties and structural similarities as feature variables. Dimension reduction was applied using principal component analysis. The dataset was split into training (80%) and validation (20%) sets. Six different models were trained and optimized through fivefold cross-validation.

RESULTS

From April 2004 to December 2020, 947 drugs with the adverse reaction name "anaphylactic shock" were extracted from the JADER database. 320 drugs were excluded due to analytical challenges, and another 400 were removed due to their administration route. 227 drugs were finalized as target medicines. For model validation, the performance of each model was evaluated based on metrics like AUCs of ROC curve, sensitivity, and specificity. Additionally, two ensemble models, constructed from the six models were assessed using bootstrap sampling. Interestingly, it was identified that mepivacaine structural similarity had the highest importance in the final model.

CONCLUSIONS

The study successfully developed an AI-based prediction model for anaphylactic shock inducing-injection drugs. The model would offer potential for drug safety evaluation and anaphylactic shock risk assessment.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在使用日本真实世界数据(JADER 数据库)和基于化学结构的分析方法,开发一种基于人工智能的预测注射类药物引发过敏反应的模型。

方法

从 JADER 数据库中获取的数据包括 2004 年 4 月至 2020 年 12 月的药物不良反应报告。仅选择不良反应名称为“过敏性休克”的药物进行分析。在构建模型时,构建了各种模型来预测引发过敏性休克的药物,如逻辑回归、LASSO、XGBoost、RF、SVM 和 NNW。这些模型使用化学性质和结构相似性作为特征变量。使用主成分分析进行降维。数据集分为训练集(80%)和验证集(20%)。通过五重交叉验证训练和优化了六个不同的模型。

结果

从 2004 年 4 月至 2020 年 12 月,从 JADER 数据库中提取了 947 种不良反应名称为“过敏性休克”的药物。由于分析挑战,320 种药物被排除在外,另有 400 种药物由于给药途径被排除在外。最终确定 227 种药物为目标药物。在模型验证方面,根据 ROC 曲线的 AUC、灵敏度和特异性等指标评估了每个模型的性能。此外,还使用 bootstrap 采样评估了由六个模型构建的两个集成模型。有趣的是,发现甲哌卡因结构相似性在最终模型中具有最高的重要性。

结论

本研究成功开发了一种基于人工智能的预测引发过敏性休克的注射类药物的模型。该模型将为药物安全性评估和过敏性休克风险评估提供潜在的帮助。

相似文献

1
Developing an AI-based prediction model for anaphylactic shock from injection drugs using Japanese real-world data and chemical structure-based analysis.利用日本真实世界数据和基于化学结构的分析开发用于注射药物过敏反应的人工智能预测模型。
Daru. 2024 Jun;32(1):253-262. doi: 10.1007/s40199-024-00511-4. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
2
Association between anaphylaxis and anti-influenza drug use: An analysis of the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database.抗流感药物使用与过敏反应的相关性:基于日本不良药物事件报告数据库的分析。
Drug Discov Ther. 2021;15(3):150-155. doi: 10.5582/ddt.2021.01053.
3
Drug safety and big clinical data: Detection of drug-induced anaphylactic shock events.药物安全性与大型临床数据:药物性过敏性休克事件的检测
J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 Jun;24(3):536-544. doi: 10.1111/jep.12908. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
4
Safety of Memantine in Combination with Potentially Interactive Drugs in the Real World: A Pharmacovigilance Study Using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) Database.美金刚与潜在相互作用药物联合使用的安全性:使用日本不良药物事件报告(JADER)数据库的药物警戒研究。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;82(3):1333-1344. doi: 10.3233/JAD-210524.
5
Polypharmacy in elderly patients in Japan: Analysis of Japanese real-world databases.日本老年患者的多种药物治疗:日本真实世界数据库分析。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2020 Oct;45(5):991-996. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13122. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
6
Drug-induced anaphylaxis : case/non-case study based on an italian pharmacovigilance database.药物性过敏反应:基于意大利药物警戒数据库的病例/非病例研究
Drug Saf. 2005;28(6):547-56. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200528060-00006.
7
Development of a Drug Safety Signal Detection Reference Set Using Japanese Safety Information.利用日本安全信息开发药物安全信号检测参考集。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025 Mar;59(2):288-294. doi: 10.1007/s43441-024-00729-z. Epub 2024 Dec 21.
8
Analysis of anticholinergic adverse effects using two large databases: The US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database and the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database.使用两个大型数据库分析抗胆碱能不良反应:美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统数据库和日本药物不良反应报告数据库。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 2;16(12):e0260980. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260980. eCollection 2021.
9
Analysis of drug-induced anaphylaxis cases using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database - secondary publication.使用日本药品不良事件报告(JADER)数据库对药物性过敏反应病例进行分析——二次发表。
Allergol Int. 2023 Oct;72(4):580-587. doi: 10.1016/j.alit.2023.03.006. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
10
Characteristics and patterns of adverse event reports in the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database over two decades (2004-2023): Exploring findings on sexes and age groups.日本药品不良事件报告数据库二十年间(2004 - 2023年)不良事件报告的特征与模式:探索性别和年龄组的相关发现。
Drug Discov Ther. 2025 Mar 6;19(1):10-21. doi: 10.5582/ddt.2024.01090. Epub 2025 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing shock prediction: leveraging prior knowledge and self-controlled data for enhanced model accuracy and generalizability.推进休克预测:利用先验知识和自我控制的数据提高模型准确性和通用性。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jul 14;25(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03108-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of Corticosteroid-Induced Glaucoma Using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Reporting Database.使用日本药品不良事件报告数据库对皮质类固醇性青光眼进行分析。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023 Jun 30;16(7):948. doi: 10.3390/ph16070948.
2
Analysis of drug-induced anaphylaxis cases using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database - secondary publication.使用日本药品不良事件报告(JADER)数据库对药物性过敏反应病例进行分析——二次发表。
Allergol Int. 2023 Oct;72(4):580-587. doi: 10.1016/j.alit.2023.03.006. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
3
The Japanese Epidemiologic Study for Perioperative Anaphylaxis, a prospective nationwide study: allergen exposure, epidemiology, and diagnosis of anaphylaxis during general anaesthesia.日本围手术期过敏症的流行病学研究,一项前瞻性全国性研究:全身麻醉期间的过敏原暴露、流行病学和过敏反应的诊断。
Br J Anaesth. 2023 Jul;131(1):159-169. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.02.018. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
4
Preoperative prediction of the need for arterial and central venous catheterization using machine learning techniques.使用机器学习技术预测动脉和中心静脉置管的需求。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 13;12(1):11948. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16144-z.
5
[ANALYSIS OF DRUG-INDUCED ANAPHYLAXIS CASES USING THE JAPANESE ADVERSE DRUG EVENT REPORT DATABASE].[利用日本药品不良事件报告数据库对药物性过敏反应病例进行分析]
Arerugi. 2022;71(3):231-241. doi: 10.15036/arerugi.71.231.
6
Response to letter to the editor regarding "Development and validation of a predictive model algorithm to identify anaphylaxis in adults with type 2 diabetes in U.S. administrative claims data".对致编辑信的回复,信的内容是关于“在美国行政索赔数据中开发和验证用于识别2型糖尿病成人患者过敏反应的预测模型算法”
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2022 Jan;31(1):110-111. doi: 10.1002/pds.5376. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
7
Association between anaphylaxis and anti-influenza drug use: An analysis of the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database.抗流感药物使用与过敏反应的相关性:基于日本不良药物事件报告数据库的分析。
Drug Discov Ther. 2021;15(3):150-155. doi: 10.5582/ddt.2021.01053.
8
Development and validation of a predictive model algorithm to identify anaphylaxis in adults with type 2 diabetes in U.S. administrative claims data.开发和验证一种预测模型算法,以在美国行政索赔数据中识别 2 型糖尿病成人中的过敏反应。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021 Jul;30(7):918-926. doi: 10.1002/pds.5257. Epub 2021 May 5.
9
Development of machine learning model for diagnostic disease prediction based on laboratory tests.基于实验室检查的机器学习模型在疾病诊断预测中的开发。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 7;11(1):7567. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87171-5.
10
Efficient prediction of drug-drug interaction using deep learning models.利用深度学习模型实现药物-药物相互作用的高效预测。
IET Syst Biol. 2020 Aug;14(4):211-216. doi: 10.1049/iet-syb.2019.0116.