Suppr超能文献

新型多学科涎腺学会(MSGS)问卷:国际共识。

Novel Multidisciplinary Salivary Gland Society (MSGS) Questionnaire: An International Consensus.

机构信息

Department of Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Medicine and Pathology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery Department, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2022 Feb;132(2):322-331. doi: 10.1002/lary.29731. Epub 2021 Jul 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

First, establishment and validation of a novel questionnaire documenting the burden of xerostomia and sialadenitis symptoms, including quality of life. Second, to compare two versions regarding the answering scale (proposed developed answers Q3 vs. 0-10 visual analogue scale Q10) of our newly developed questionnaire, in order to evaluate their comprehension by patients and their reproducibility in time.

STUDY DESIGN

The study is a systematic review regarding the evaluation of the existing questionnaire and a cohort study regarding the validation of our new MSGS questionnaire.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A Multidisciplinary Salivary Gland Society (MSGS) questionnaire consisting of 20 questions and two scoring systems was developed to quantify symptoms of dry mouth and sialadenitis. Validation of the questionnaire was carried out on 199 patients with salivary pathologies (digestive, nasal, or age-related xerostomia, post radiation therapy, post radioiodine therapy, Sjögren's syndrome, IgG4 disease, recurrent juvenile parotitis, stones, and strictures) and a control group of 66 healthy volunteers. The coherence of the questionnaire's items, its reliability to distinguish patients from healthy volunteers, its comparison with unstimulated sialometry, and the time to fill both versions were assessed.

RESULTS

The novel MSGS questionnaire showed good internal coherence of the items, indicating its pertinence: the scale reliability coefficients amounted to a Cronbach's alpha of 0.92 for Q10 and 0.90 for Q3. The time to complete Q3 and Q10 amounted, respectively, to 5.23 min (±2.3 min) and 5.65 min (±2.64 min) for patients and to 3.94 min (±3.94 min) and 3.75 min (±2.11 min) for healthy volunteers. The difference between Q3 and Q10 was not significant.

CONCLUSION

We present a novel self-administered questionnaire quantifying xerostomia and non-tumoral salivary gland pathologies. We recommend the use of the Q10 version, as its scale type is well known in the literature and it translation for international use will be more accurate. Laryngoscope, 132:322-331, 2022.

摘要

目的

首先,建立并验证一种新的问卷,用于记录口干和唾液腺炎症状的负担,包括生活质量。其次,比较两个版本的回答量表(提出的 Q3 与 10 分制视觉模拟量表 Q10),以评估患者对问卷的理解及其在时间上的再现性。

研究设计

该研究是一项关于现有问卷评估的系统评价,以及一项关于我们新的 MSGS 问卷验证的队列研究。

材料和方法

由 20 个问题和两个评分系统组成的多学科唾液腺学会(MSGS)问卷用于量化口干和唾液腺炎的症状。该问卷的验证在 199 名唾液腺疾病患者(消化性、鼻性或年龄相关性口干、放射治疗后、放射性碘治疗后、干燥综合征、IgG4 疾病、复发性青少年腮腺炎、结石和狭窄)和 66 名健康志愿者对照组成的对照组中进行。评估了问卷项目的一致性、其区分患者与健康志愿者的可靠性、其与非刺激唾液流率的比较以及填写两个版本的时间。

结果

新的 MSGS 问卷显示项目的内在一致性较好,表明其相关性:量表可靠性系数为 Q10 的 Cronbach's alpha 为 0.92,Q3 的 Cronbach's alpha 为 0.90。完成 Q3 和 Q10 的时间分别为患者的 5.23 分钟(±2.3 分钟)和 5.65 分钟(±2.64 分钟),健康志愿者的 3.94 分钟(±3.94 分钟)和 3.75 分钟(±2.11 分钟)。Q3 和 Q10 之间的差异不显著。

结论

我们提出了一种新的自我管理问卷,用于量化口干和非肿瘤性唾液腺疾病。我们建议使用 Q10 版本,因为其量表类型在文献中广为人知,并且它的翻译对于国际使用将更加准确。喉科杂志,132:322-331,2022。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baf3/9291943/d5fd4c7610c2/LARY-132-322-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验