Suppr超能文献

导管消融与药物治疗对心房颤动患者生活质量的影响:CABANA 随机临床试验。

Effect of Catheter Ablation vs Medical Therapy on Quality of Life Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: The CABANA Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

JAMA. 2019 Apr 2;321(13):1275-1285. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.0692.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Catheter ablation is more effective than drug therapy in restoring sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but its incremental effect on long-term quality of life (QOL) is uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether catheter ablation is more beneficial than conventional drug therapy for improving QOL in patients with AF.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: An open-label randomized clinical trial of catheter ablation vs drug therapy in 2204 symptomatic patients with AF older than 65 years or 65 years or younger with at least 1 risk factor for stroke. Patients were enrolled from November 2009 to April 2016 from 126 centers in 10 countries. Follow-up ended in December 2017.

INTERVENTIONS

Pulmonary vein isolation, with additional ablation procedures at the discretion of the investigators, for the catheter ablation group (n = 1108) and standard rhythm and/or rate-control drugs selected and managed by investigators for the drug therapy group (n = 1096).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Prespecified co-primary QOL end points at 12 months, including the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life (AFEQT) summary score (range, 0-100; 0 indicates complete disability and 100 indicates no disability; patient-level clinically important difference, ≥5 points) and the Mayo AF-Specific Symptom Inventory (MAFSI) frequency score (range, 0-40; 0 indicates no symptoms and 40 indicates the most severe symptoms; patient-level clinically important difference, ≤-1.6 points) and severity score (range, 0-30; 0 indicates no symptoms and 30 indicates the most severe symptoms; patient-level clinically important difference, ≤-1.3 points).

RESULTS

Among 2204 randomized patients (median age, 68 years; 1385 patients [63%] were men, 946 [43%] had paroxysmal AF, and 1256 [57%] had persistent AF), the median follow-up was 48.5 months, and 1968 (89%) completed the trial. The mean AFEQT summary score was more favorable in the catheter ablation group than the drug therapy group at 12 months (86.4 points vs 80.9 points) (adjusted difference, 5.3 points [95% CI, 3.7-6.9]; P < .001). The mean MAFSI frequency score was more favorable for the catheter ablation group than the drug therapy group at 12 months (6.4 points vs 8.1 points) (adjusted difference, -1.7 points [95% CI, -2.3 to -1.2]; P < .001) and the mean MAFSI severity score was more favorable for the catheter ablation group than the drug therapy group at 12 months (5.0 points vs 6.5 points) (adjusted difference, -1.5 points [95% CI, -2.0 to -1.1]; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation, catheter ablation, compared with medical therapy, led to clinically important and significant improvements in quality of life at 12 months. These findings can help guide decisions regarding management of atrial fibrillation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00911508.

摘要

重要性

导管消融在恢复心房颤动(AF)患者窦性心律方面比药物治疗更有效,但它对长期生活质量(QOL)的增量影响尚不确定。

目的

确定导管消融是否比常规药物治疗更有益于改善 AF 患者的 QOL。

设计、地点和参与者:一项开放标签的随机临床试验,比较导管消融与药物治疗 2204 例年龄大于 65 岁或 65 岁以下、有至少 1 个中风风险因素的症状性 AF 患者。患者于 2009 年 11 月至 2016 年 4 月从 10 个国家的 126 个中心招募。随访于 2017 年 12 月结束。

干预措施

肺静脉隔离术,另外根据研究者的判断进行额外的消融程序,用于导管消融组(n = 1108)和由研究者选择和管理的标准节律和/或速率控制药物,用于药物治疗组(n = 1096)。

主要结果和测量

12 个月时预设的 co-primary QOL 终点,包括房颤对生活质量的影响(AFEQT)综合评分(范围,0-100;0 表示完全残疾,100 表示无残疾;患者水平的临床重要差异,≥5 分)和梅奥房颤特异性症状量表(MAFSI)频率评分(范围,0-40;0 表示无症状,40 表示最严重症状;患者水平的临床重要差异,≤-1.6 分)和严重程度评分(范围,0-30;0 表示无症状,30 表示最严重症状;患者水平的临床重要差异,≤-1.3 分)。

结果

在 2204 名随机患者(中位年龄 68 岁;1385 名患者[63%]为男性,946 名[43%]为阵发性 AF,1256 名[57%]为持续性 AF)中,中位随访时间为 48.5 个月,1968 名(89%)完成了试验。12 个月时,导管消融组的 AFEQT 综合评分优于药物治疗组(86.4 分比 80.9 分)(调整差异,5.3 分[95%CI,3.7-6.9];P < .001)。12 个月时,导管消融组的 MAFSI 频率评分优于药物治疗组(6.4 分比 8.1 分)(调整差异,-1.7 分[95%CI,-2.3 至-1.2];P < .001),导管消融组的 MAFSI 严重程度评分也优于药物治疗组(5.0 分比 6.5 分)(调整差异,-1.5 分[95%CI,-2.0 至-1.1];P < .001)。

结论和相关性

在有症状的房颤患者中,与药物治疗相比,导管消融在 12 个月时导致生活质量有显著的临床改善。这些发现有助于指导房颤管理决策。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT00911508。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Assessing quality-of-life outcomes in cardiovascular clinical research.评估心血管临床研究中的生活质量结局。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2016 May;13(5):286-308. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2016.10. Epub 2016 Feb 18.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验