• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨科创伤手术中的外科手套:有多少会失去完整性?

Surgical Gloves in Orthopedic Trauma Procedures: How Many Lose Their Integrity?

作者信息

de Barros Maurício Pandini Monteiro, Godoi Thales Thiago Ferreira, Ferretti Filho Mario, Fernandes Helio Jorge Alchavian, Dos Reis Fernando Baldy

机构信息

Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

出版信息

Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2021 Jun;56(3):379-383. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1722591. Epub 2021 Jul 1.

DOI:10.1055/s-0040-1722591
PMID:34239206
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8249058/
Abstract

The possibility of perforation of gloves during orthopedic surgeries can reach 56.8%, and it mainly related to the manipulation of blunt instruments. Surgeries for the treatment of fractures and trauma present additional risk due to contact with bone spires.  Analysis of the prevalence of loss of integrity of surgical gloves in orthopedic trauma procedures, especially fractures, and evaluation of the surgeon's exposure and contact with secretions from the patient.  Macroscopic inspection of the gloves of two surgeons specialized in trauma, over a period of 4 months. Both used two gloves for all procedures and, at the end of the surgery, analyzed the presence or absence of blood stains on the internal gloves and/or fingers. The procedures were categorized according to the time and type of surgery. The intercurrence investigated was the perforation of one or two gloves; if the tear was perceived immediately or only at the end of the surgery, and the location of and reason for the tear, if identified.  A total of 210 surgeries were included, 87 of which presented perforations, with 17 cases occurring in both gloves and 70 only in the outer glove. Finally, there was a more significant relationship with open focus surgeries and duration > 60 minutes.  Our results suggest that greater care and inspection of gloves to look for damage are needed in prolonged surgeries with an open focus.

摘要

骨科手术中手套穿孔的可能性可达56.8%,这主要与钝器操作有关。由于接触骨尖,骨折和创伤治疗手术存在额外风险。 分析骨科创伤手术,尤其是骨折手术中手术手套完整性丧失的发生率,并评估外科医生与患者分泌物的接触情况。 对两名创伤专科医生的手套进行了为期4个月的宏观检查。两人在所有手术中都使用两副手套,手术结束时,分析内手套和/或手指上是否有血迹。手术程序根据时间和类型进行分类。调查的并发情况是一副或两副手套穿孔;撕裂是在手术过程中立即被察觉还是仅在手术结束时被发现,以及撕裂的位置和原因(如果确定)。 共纳入210例手术,其中87例出现穿孔,17例两副手套均穿孔,70例仅外层手套穿孔。最后,开放伤口手术和手术时间>60分钟与之有更显著的关系。 我们的结果表明,在有开放伤口的长时间手术中,需要更加小心并检查手套是否有损坏。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f266/8249058/77d7d55b39cb/10-1055-s-0040-1722591-i2000223pt-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f266/8249058/ffe3398ef3eb/10-1055-s-0040-1722591-i2000223en-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f266/8249058/77d7d55b39cb/10-1055-s-0040-1722591-i2000223pt-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f266/8249058/ffe3398ef3eb/10-1055-s-0040-1722591-i2000223en-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f266/8249058/77d7d55b39cb/10-1055-s-0040-1722591-i2000223pt-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Surgical Gloves in Orthopedic Trauma Procedures: How Many Lose Their Integrity?骨科创伤手术中的外科手套:有多少会失去完整性?
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2021 Jun;56(3):379-383. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1722591. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
2
Recognition of intraoperative surgical glove perforation: a comparison by surgical role and level of training.术中手术手套穿孔的识别:按手术角色和培训水平进行比较。
Can J Surg. 2022 Feb 8;65(1):E82-E88. doi: 10.1503/cjs.016720. Print 2022 Jan-Feb.
3
Colored Indicator Undergloves Increase the Detection of Glove Perforations by Surgeons During Small Animal Orthopedic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.有色指示内手套可提高外科医生在小动物骨科手术中对手套穿孔的检测率:一项随机对照试验
Vet Surg. 2016 Aug;45(6):709-14. doi: 10.1111/vsu.12519. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
4
High Risk of Surgical Glove Perforation From Surgical Rotatory Instruments.手术旋转器械导致手术手套穿孔的高风险
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Nov;474(11):2513-2517. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4948-3. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
5
Glove perforation time and frequency in total hip arthroplasty procedures.全髋关节置换手术中手套穿孔的时间和频率
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2012;46(1):57-60. doi: 10.3944/aott.2012.2660.
6
Prospective data collection and analysis of perforations and tears of latex surgical gloves during primary endoprosthetic surgeries.初次假体植入手术中乳胶手术手套穿孔和撕裂的前瞻性数据收集与分析。
GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2016 Dec 20;11:Doc25. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000285. eCollection 2016.
7
The global incidence and associated factors of surgical gloves perforation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.手术手套穿孔的全球发病率及相关因素:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
Work. 2022;71(4):859-869. doi: 10.3233/WOR-210286.
8
Prospective study of glove perforation in obstetrical and gynecological operations: are we safe enough?妇产科手术中手套穿孔的前瞻性研究:我们是否足够安全?
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2004 Aug;30(4):319-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2004.00201.x.
9
Frequency of glove perforations and subsequent blood contact in association with selected obstetric surgical procedures.与选定产科手术相关的手套穿孔频率及随后的血液接触情况。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 May;168(5):1354-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)90764-9.
10
Double or single gloves: which is safer in pediatric orthopedic surgery.双层还是单层手套:小儿骨科手术中哪种更安全。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2006 May-Jun;26(3):409-11. doi: 10.1097/01.bpo.0000217728.01170.4b.

引用本文的文献

1
Higher rate of undetected intraoperative damage of latex-free surgical gloves worn by scrub nurses.刷手护士佩戴的无乳胶手术手套术中未被发现的损伤率更高。
Perioper Med (Lond). 2025 May 6;14(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13741-025-00539-3.
2
Assessment of glove integrity across various dental specialties in a dental school setting.在牙科学校环境中对不同牙科专业手套完整性的评估。
Front Oral Health. 2024 Dec 18;5:1496918. doi: 10.3389/froh.2024.1496918. eCollection 2024.
3
Is Single Gloving Still Acceptable? Investigation and Evaluation of Damages on Sterile Latex Gloves in General Surgery.

本文引用的文献

1
Damages with High Consequences: Analysis of Perforations in Surgical Latex Operation Gloves from Orthopedic Surgeries.具有严重后果的损伤:骨科手术中外科乳胶手术手套穿孔情况分析
Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp). 2018 Nov 26;8(4):159-162. doi: 10.1556/1886.2018.00028. eCollection 2018 Dec 23.
2
Influence of orthopedic reinforced gloves versus double standard gloves on contamination events during small animal orthopedic surgery.矫形增强手套与双层标准手套对小动物矫形外科手术中污染事件的影响。
Vet Surg. 2017 Oct;46(7):981-985. doi: 10.1111/vsu.12688. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
3
Perforation of Surgical Gloves during Lower Extremity Fracture Surgery and Hip Joint Replacement Surgery.
单手套使用是否仍可接受?普通外科无菌乳胶手套损伤情况的调查与评估。
J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 29;10(17):3887. doi: 10.3390/jcm10173887.
下肢骨折手术及髋关节置换手术中手术手套穿孔情况
Hip Pelvis. 2015 Mar;27(1):17-22. doi: 10.5371/hp.2015.27.1.17. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
4
The rate of glove perforations in orthopaedic procedures: single versus double gloving. A prospective study.骨科手术中手套穿孔率:单层手套与双层手套对比。一项前瞻性研究。
Med J Malaysia. 2006 Dec;61 Suppl B:3-7.
5
Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection.双层手套可减少手术交叉感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD003087. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003087.pub2.
6
Glove perforation in orthopaedic and trauma surgery. A comparison between single, double indicator gloving and double gloving with two regular gloves.骨科与创伤外科中的手套穿孔。单指标准手套、双指标准手套与两层普通手套双层手套的比较。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Aug;86(6):898-900. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b6.14821.
7
Outer gloves in orthopaedic procedures: a polyester/stainless steel wire weave glove liner compared with latex.骨科手术中的外层手套:聚酯/不锈钢丝编织手套内衬与乳胶手套的比较
J Orthop Trauma. 1998 Feb;12(2):101-5. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199802000-00006.
8
Increased awareness of glove perforation in major joint replacement. A prospective, randomised study of Regent Biogel Reveal gloves.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997 May;79(3):371-3. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.79b3.7234.
9
Intraoperative glove perforation. A comparative analysis.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 Dec(297):242-4.
10
Glove perforation in elective orthopedic surgery.择期骨科手术中的手套穿孔
Acta Orthop Scand. 1989 Oct;60(5):565-6. doi: 10.3109/17453678909150123.