Hsiao Chu J, Patel Aditi G M, Fasanya Henrietta O, Stoffel Michelle R, Beal Stacy G, Winston-McPherson Gabrielle N, Campbell Sean T, Cotten Steven W, Crews Bridgit O, Kuan Kevin, Lapedis Cathryn J, Mathias Patrick C, Peck Palmer Octavia M, Greene Dina N
Department of Anthropology, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
MD-PhD Program, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
J Appl Lab Med. 2021 Sep 1;6(5):1143-1154. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfab059.
Racial disparities in SARS-CoV-2 prevalence are apparent. Race is a sociocultural construct, necessitating investigation into how sociocultural factors contribute.
This cross-sectional study linked laboratory data of adult patients between February 29 and May 15, 2020 with socio-demographics variables from the 2018 American Community Survey (ACS). Medical sites included healthcare organizations in Michigan, New York, North Carolina, California, Florida, Pennsylvania, and Washington. Race was treated as a proxy for racism and not biological essentialism. Laboratory data included patient age, sex, race, ethnicity, test result, test location, and residential ZIP code. ACS data included economic and educational variables contributing to an SES Index, population density, proportion Medicaid, and racial composition for corresponding ZIP code. Associations between race/socioeconomic variables and test results were examined using odds ratios (OR).
Of 126 452 patients [mean (SD) age 51.9 (18.4) years; 52 747 (41.7%) men; 68 856 (54.5%) White and 27 805 (22.0%) Black], 18 905 (15.0%) tested positive. Of positive tests, 5238 (SD 27.7%) were White and 7223 (SD 38.2%) were Black. Black race increased the odds of a positive test; this finding was consistent across sites [OR 2.11 (95% CI 1.95-2.29)]. When subset by race, higher SES increased the odds of a positive test for White patients [OR 1.10 (95% CI 1.05-1.16)] but decreased the odds for Black patients [OR 0.92 (95% CI 0.86-0.99)]. Black patients, but not White patients, who tested positive overwhelmingly resided in more densely populated areas.
Black race was associated with SARS-CoV-2 positivity and the relationship between SES and test positivity differed by race, suggesting the impact of socioeconomic status on test positivity is race-specific.
严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染率的种族差异很明显。种族是一种社会文化建构,因此有必要调查社会文化因素是如何产生影响的。
这项横断面研究将2020年2月29日至5月15日成年患者的实验室数据与2018年美国社区调查(ACS)中的社会人口统计学变量相关联。医疗场所包括密歇根州、纽约州、北卡罗来纳州、加利福尼亚州、佛罗里达州、宾夕法尼亚州和华盛顿州的医疗机构。种族被视为种族主义的代表,而非生物学本质主义。实验室数据包括患者年龄、性别、种族、族裔、检测结果、检测地点和居住邮政编码。ACS数据包括有助于生成社会经济地位指数的经济和教育变量、人口密度、医疗补助比例以及相应邮政编码区域的种族构成。使用比值比(OR)来检验种族/社会经济变量与检测结果之间的关联。
在126452名患者中(平均年龄51.9岁(标准差18.4岁);男性52747名(41.7%);白人68856名(54.5%),黑人27805名(22.0%)),18905名(15.0%)检测呈阳性。在检测呈阳性的患者中,5238名(标准差27.7%)为白人,7223名(标准差38.2%)为黑人。黑人种族增加了检测呈阳性的几率;这一发现在所研究的各个地点都是一致的[比值比2.11(95%置信区间1.95-2.29)]。按种族进行分组分析时,较高的社会经济地位增加了白人患者检测呈阳性的几率[比值比1.10(95%置信区间1.05-1.16)],但降低了黑人患者检测呈阳性的几率[比值比0.92(95%置信区间0.86-0.99)]。检测呈阳性的黑人患者绝大多数居住在人口更为密集的地区,而白人患者并非如此。
黑人种族与SARS-CoV-2检测呈阳性有关,并且社会经济地位与检测呈阳性之间的关系因种族而异,这表明社会经济地位对检测呈阳性的影响具有种族特异性。