• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用非处方SARS-CoV-2检测试剂盒并借助数字智能手机应用程序进行居家连续检测的可行性:纵向队列研究

Feasibility of At-Home Serial Testing Using Over-the-Counter SARS-CoV-2 Tests With a Digital Smartphone App for Assistance: Longitudinal Cohort Study.

作者信息

Herbert Carly, Broach John, Heetderks William, Qashu Felicia, Gibson Laura, Pretz Caitlin, Woods Kelsey, Kheterpal Vik, Suvarna Thejas, Nowak Christopher, Lazar Peter, Ayturk Didem, Barton Bruce, Achenbach Chad, Murphy Robert, McManus David, Soni Apurv

机构信息

Program in Digital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2022 Oct 18;6(10):e35426. doi: 10.2196/35426.

DOI:10.2196/35426
PMID:36041004
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9580993/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic necessitates the development of accurate, rapid, and affordable diagnostics to help curb disease transmission, morbidity, and mortality. Rapid antigen tests are important tools for scaling up testing for SARS-CoV-2; however, little is known about individuals' use of rapid antigen tests at home and how to facilitate the user experience.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the feasibility and acceptability of serial self-testing with rapid antigen tests for SARS-CoV-2, including need for assistance and the reliability of self-interpretation.

METHODS

A total of 206 adults in the United States with smartphones were enrolled in this single-arm feasibility study in February and March 2021. All participants were asked to self-test for COVID-19 at home using rapid antigen tests daily for 14 days and use a smartphone app for testing assistance and to report their results. The main outcomes were adherence to the testing schedule, the acceptability of testing and smartphone app experiences, and the reliability of participants versus study team's interpretation of test results. Descriptive statistics were used to report the acceptability, adherence, overall rating, and experience of using the at-home test and MyDataHelps app. The usability, acceptability, adherence, and quality of at-home testing were analyzed across different sociodemographic, age, and educational attainment groups.

RESULTS

Of the 206 enrolled participants, 189 (91.7%) and 159 (77.2%) completed testing and follow-up surveys, respectively. In total, 51.3% (97/189) of study participants were women, the average age was 40.7 years, 34.4% (65/189) were non-White, and 82% (155/189) had a bachelor's degree or higher. Most (n=133/206, 64.6%) participants showed high testing adherence, meaning they completed over 75% of the assigned tests. Participants' interpretations of test results demonstrated high agreement (2106/2130, 98.9%) with the study verified results, with a κ score of 0.29 (P<.001). Participants reported high satisfaction with self-testing and the smartphone app, with 98.7% (157/159) reporting that they would recommend the self-test and smartphone app to others. These results were consistent across age, race/ethnicity, and gender.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants' high adherence to the recommended testing schedule, significant reliability between participants and study staff's test interpretation, and the acceptability of the smartphone app and self-test indicate that self-tests for SARS-CoV-2 with a smartphone app for assistance and reporting is a highly feasible testing modality among a diverse population of adults in the United States.

摘要

背景

正在肆虐的新型冠状病毒肺炎(SARS-CoV-2)疫情使得开发准确、快速且经济实惠的诊断方法成为必要,以帮助遏制疾病传播、发病率和死亡率。快速抗原检测是扩大SARS-CoV-2检测规模的重要工具;然而,对于个人在家中使用快速抗原检测的情况以及如何提升用户体验,我们知之甚少。

目的

本研究旨在描述使用快速抗原检测进行SARS-CoV-2系列自我检测的可行性和可接受性,包括对协助的需求以及自我解读的可靠性。

方法

2021年2月和3月,共有206名在美国拥有智能手机的成年人参与了这项单臂可行性研究。所有参与者被要求在家中每天使用快速抗原检测进行14天的新冠病毒自我检测,并使用一款智能手机应用程序获取检测协助并报告结果。主要结果包括对检测计划的依从性、检测及智能手机应用程序体验的可接受性,以及参与者与研究团队对检测结果解读的可靠性。描述性统计用于报告在家检测和MyDataHelps应用程序的可接受性、依从性、总体评分及使用体验。对不同社会人口统计学、年龄和教育程度组别的家庭检测的可用性、可接受性、依从性和质量进行了分析。

结果

在206名登记参与者中,分别有189名(91.7%)和159名(77.2%)完成了检测和随访调查。总体而言,51.3%(97/189)的研究参与者为女性,平均年龄为40.7岁,34.4%(65/189)为非白人,82%(155/189)拥有学士学位或更高学历。大多数(n = 133/206,64.6%)参与者表现出较高的检测依从性,即他们完成了超过75%的指定检测。参与者对检测结果的解读与研究核实结果高度一致(2106/2130,98.9%),κ值为0.29(P <.001)。参与者对自我检测和智能手机应用程序满意度较高,98.7%(157/159)的参与者表示会向他人推荐自我检测和智能手机应用程序。这些结果在年龄、种族/族裔和性别方面是一致的。

结论

参与者对推荐检测计划的高度依从性、参与者与研究人员对检测结果解读之间的显著可靠性,以及智能手机应用程序和自我检测的可接受性表明,在美国不同成年人群体中,借助智能手机应用程序进行协助和报告的SARS-CoV-2自我检测是一种高度可行的检测方式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b41/9580993/851ccf4bc9f5/formative_v6i10e35426_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b41/9580993/18f8a8b18ad1/formative_v6i10e35426_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b41/9580993/d9c15008ebba/formative_v6i10e35426_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b41/9580993/9f0f8943528c/formative_v6i10e35426_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b41/9580993/b9807c5be867/formative_v6i10e35426_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b41/9580993/851ccf4bc9f5/formative_v6i10e35426_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b41/9580993/18f8a8b18ad1/formative_v6i10e35426_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b41/9580993/d9c15008ebba/formative_v6i10e35426_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b41/9580993/9f0f8943528c/formative_v6i10e35426_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b41/9580993/b9807c5be867/formative_v6i10e35426_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b41/9580993/851ccf4bc9f5/formative_v6i10e35426_fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Feasibility of At-Home Serial Testing Using Over-the-Counter SARS-CoV-2 Tests With a Digital Smartphone App for Assistance: Longitudinal Cohort Study.使用非处方SARS-CoV-2检测试剂盒并借助数字智能手机应用程序进行居家连续检测的可行性:纵向队列研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Oct 18;6(10):e35426. doi: 10.2196/35426.
2
Personalized Smartphone-Enabled Assessment of Blood Pressure and Its Treatment During the SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 Pandemic in Patients From the CURE-19 Study: Longitudinal Observational Study.CURE-19研究中患者在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间基于个性化智能手机的血压评估及其治疗:纵向观察性研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Dec 3;12:e53430. doi: 10.2196/53430.
3
A prospective, randomized, single-blinded, crossover trial to investigate the effect of a wearable device in addition to a daily symptom diary for the Remote Early Detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections (COVID-RED): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项前瞻性、随机、单盲、交叉试验,旨在研究可穿戴设备对 SARS-CoV-2 感染(COVID-RED)的远程早期检测的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Oct 11;22(1):694. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05643-5.
4
A prospective, randomized, single-blinded, crossover trial to investigate the effect of a wearable device in addition to a daily symptom diary for the remote early detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections (COVID-RED): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项前瞻性、随机、单盲、交叉试验,旨在研究可穿戴设备对远程早期检测 SARS-CoV-2 感染(COVID-RED)的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jun 22;22(1):412. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05241-5.
5
Design and Preliminary Findings of Adherence to the Self-Testing for Our Protection From COVID-19 (STOP COVID-19) Risk-Based Testing Protocol: Prospective Digital Study.基于风险的新冠病毒自我检测以保护我们免受新冠病毒感染(STOP COVID-19)检测方案的依从性设计与初步结果:前瞻性数字研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jun 16;6(6):e38113. doi: 10.2196/38113.
6
A Smartphone App to Support Adherence to Inhaled Corticosteroids in Young Adults With Asthma: Multi-Methods Feasibility Study.一款支持哮喘青年患者坚持使用吸入性糖皮质激素的智能手机应用程序:多方法可行性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Sep 1;5(9):e28784. doi: 10.2196/28784.
7
Usability and Implementation Considerations of Fitbit and App Intervention for Diverse Cancer Survivors: Mixed Methods Study.适用于不同癌症幸存者的Fitbit及应用程序干预的可用性与实施考量:混合方法研究
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Feb 24;11:e60034. doi: 10.2196/60034.
8
Longitudinal and Combined Smartwatch and Ecological Momentary Assessment in Racially Diverse Older Adults: Feasibility, Adherence, and Acceptability Study.种族多样化的老年人中智能手表与生态瞬时评估的纵向及联合研究:可行性、依从性和可接受性研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Apr 8;12:e69952. doi: 10.2196/69952.
9
Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Efficacy of a Smartphone App-Led Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression Under Therapist Supervision: Open Trial.在治疗师监督下,智能手机应用引导的认知行为疗法治疗抑郁症的可行性、可接受性和初步疗效:开放试验。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Apr 9;11:e53998. doi: 10.2196/53998.
10
Feasibility and Acceptability of Community Coronavirus Disease 2019 Testing Strategies (FACTS) in a University Setting.2019年社区冠状病毒病检测策略(FACTS)在大学环境中的可行性和可接受性
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 4;8(12):ofab495. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab495. eCollection 2021 Dec.

引用本文的文献

1
Point-of-care testing preferences 2020-2022: Trends over the years.2020 - 2022年即时检验偏好:历年趋势
Cardiovasc Digit Health J. 2024 Mar 18;5(3):149-155. doi: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2024.03.002. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Evaluation of a novel university-based testing platform to increase access to SARS-CoV-2 testing during the COVID-19 pandemic in a cohort study.评估一种新的基于大学的检测平台,以增加在 COVID-19 大流行期间对 SARS-CoV-2 检测的机会:一项队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 4;14(6):e081837. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081837.
3
At-home testing for respiratory viruses: a minireview of the current landscape.

本文引用的文献

1
Health literacy characteristics of over-the-counter rapid antigen COVID-19 test materials.非处方快速抗原 COVID-19 检测材料的健康素养特征。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 Dec;18(12):4124-4128. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.08.003. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
2
A mixed methods study evaluating acceptability of a daily COVID-19 testing regimen with a mobile-app connected, at-home, rapid antigen test: Implications for current and future pandemics.一项混合方法研究评估了使用移动应用程序连接的家庭快速抗原检测进行日常 COVID-19 检测方案的可接受性:对当前和未来大流行的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 8;17(8):e0267766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267766. eCollection 2022.
3
家庭呼吸道病毒检测:当前现状简述。
J Clin Microbiol. 2024 May 8;62(5):e0031223. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00312-23. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
4
Self-tests for COVID-19: What is the evidence? A living systematic review and meta-analysis (2020-2023).新冠病毒自我检测:证据有哪些?一项实时系统评价与荟萃分析(2020 - 2023年)
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Feb 7;4(2):e0002336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002336. eCollection 2024.
5
Feasibility and acceptability of COVID-19 self-testing in the Philippines.菲律宾新冠病毒自我检测的可行性与可接受性
Public Health Action. 2023 Dec;13(4):119-122. doi: 10.5588/pha.23.0045. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
6
COVID-19 self-testing using antigen rapid diagnostic tests: Feasibility evaluation among health-care workers and general population in Malawi.COVID-19 抗原快速诊断检测的自我检测:在马拉维医护人员和一般人群中的可行性评估。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 28;18(7):e0289291. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289291. eCollection 2023.
7
Viral load quantitation at the point-of-care with shaken digital droplet RT-LAMP.即时护理点的数字液滴 RT-LAMP 法进行病毒载量定量检测。
Lab Chip. 2023 Jul 25;23(15):3479-3486. doi: 10.1039/d3lc00096f.
Design and Preliminary Findings of Adherence to the Self-Testing for Our Protection From COVID-19 (STOP COVID-19) Risk-Based Testing Protocol: Prospective Digital Study.
基于风险的新冠病毒自我检测以保护我们免受新冠病毒感染(STOP COVID-19)检测方案的依从性设计与初步结果:前瞻性数字研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jun 16;6(6):e38113. doi: 10.2196/38113.
4
Assessing How Consumers Interpret and Act on Results From At-Home COVID-19 Self-test Kits: A Randomized Clinical Trial.评估消费者如何解读和应对家用 COVID-19 自测试剂盒的结果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Mar 1;182(3):332-341. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.8075.
5
Diagnostic performance, user acceptability, and safety of unsupervised SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen-detecting tests performed at home.家庭环境下自行使用的 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测的诊断性能、用户接受度和安全性。
Int J Infect Dis. 2022 Mar;116:358-364. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.01.019. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
6
Racial and ethnic inequities in the early distribution of U.S. COVID-19 testing sites and mortality.美国 COVID-19 检测点和死亡率的早期分布存在种族和民族差异。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2021 Nov;51(11):e13669. doi: 10.1111/eci.13669. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
7
The Lines That Held Us: Assessing Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in SARS-CoV-2 Testing.维系我们的界限:评估2019冠状病毒病检测中的种族和社会经济差异
J Appl Lab Med. 2021 Sep 1;6(5):1143-1154. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfab059.
8
The RADx Tech Clinical Studies Core: A Model for Academic Based Clinical Studies.RADx技术临床研究核心:基于学术的临床研究模式。
IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol. 2021 Apr 28;2:152-157. doi: 10.1109/OJEMB.2021.3070830. eCollection 2021.
9
Is Covid-19 community level testing effective in reaching at-risk populations? Evidence from spatial analysis of New Orleans patient data at walk-up sites.Covid-19 社区层面检测在接触高危人群方面是否有效?新奥尔良上门服务点患者数据的空间分析证据。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 1;21(1):632. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10717-9.
10
Spatial Inequities in COVID-19 Testing, Positivity, Confirmed Cases, and Mortality in 3 U.S. Cities : An Ecological Study.美国三个城市的 COVID-19 检测、阳性率、确诊病例和死亡率的空间不平等:一项生态学研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Jul;174(7):936-944. doi: 10.7326/M20-3936. Epub 2021 Mar 30.