Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 May;37(6):1436-1443. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06976-2. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. While neighborhood-level factors, such as poverty, have been related to prevalence of AF risk factors, the association between neighborhood poverty and incident AF has been limited.
Using a large cohort from a health system serving the greater Chicago area, we sought to determine the association between neighborhood-level poverty and incident AF.
Retrospective cohort study.
Adults, aged 30 to 80 years, without baseline cardiovascular disease from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2018.
We geocoded and matched residential addresses of all eligible patients to census-level poverty estimates from the American Community Survey. Neighborhood-level poverty (low, intermediate, and high) was defined as the proportion of residents in the census tract living below the federal poverty threshold. We used generalized linear mixed effects models with a logit link function to examine the association between neighborhood poverty and incident AF, adjusting for patient demographic and clinical AF risk factors.
Among 28,858 in the cohort, patients in the high poverty group were more often non-Hispanic Black or Hispanic and had higher rates of AF risk factors. Over 5 years of follow-up, 971 (3.4%) patients developed incident AF. Of these, 502 (51.7%) were in the low poverty, 327 (33.7%) in the intermediate poverty, and 142 (14.6%) in the high poverty group. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of AF was higher for the intermediate poverty compared with that for the low poverty group (aOR 1.23 [95% CI 1.01-1.48]). The point estimate for the aOR of AF incidence was similar, but not statistically significant, for the high poverty compared with the low poverty group (aOR 1.25 [95% CI 0.98-1.59]).
In adults without baseline cardiovascular disease managed in a large, integrated health system, intermediate neighborhood poverty was significantly associated with incident AF. Understanding neighborhood-level drivers of AF disparities will help achieve equitable care.
心房颤动(AF)是心血管发病率和死亡率的主要原因。虽然邻里环境因素(如贫困)与 AF 危险因素的流行有关,但邻里贫困与 AF 发病之间的关系尚有限。
利用一个服务于大芝加哥地区的医疗系统的大型队列,我们试图确定社区贫困水平与 AF 发病之间的关联。
回顾性队列研究。
年龄在 30 至 80 岁之间,无基线心血管疾病的成年人,来自 2005 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日。
我们对所有符合条件的患者的居住地址进行地理编码,并与美国社区调查的人口普查贫困估计值相匹配。邻里贫困(低、中、高)定义为居住在普查区内的居民中低于联邦贫困线的比例。我们使用广义线性混合效应模型和对数链接函数来检验邻里贫困与 AF 发病之间的关联,同时调整患者的人口统计学和临床 AF 风险因素。
在队列中的 28858 名患者中,高贫困组的患者更多是非西班牙裔黑人或西班牙裔,且 AF 风险因素的发生率更高。在 5 年的随访期间,971 名(3.4%)患者发生了 AF 发病。其中,502 例(51.7%)为低贫困组,327 例(33.7%)为中贫困组,142 例(14.6%)为高贫困组。与低贫困组相比,中间贫困组发生 AF 的调整优势比(aOR)更高(aOR 1.23[95%CI 1.01-1.48])。高贫困组与低贫困组相比,AF 发病率的 aOR 点估计值相似,但无统计学意义(aOR 1.25[95%CI 0.98-1.59])。
在没有基线心血管疾病的成年人中,在一个大型综合医疗系统中管理,中等程度的邻里贫困与 AF 发病显著相关。了解 AF 差异的邻里环境驱动因素将有助于实现公平护理。