Queensland University of Technology Faculty of Health, School of Nursing, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Homeless Health Service, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 9;16(7):e0254100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254100. eCollection 2021.
The objectives of this scoping review are to investigate the characteristics assessed by existing vulnerability indices and the health outcomes achieved by applying them to people experiencing homelessness. This review forms part of the development and implementation of a novel tool to prioritise people experiencing homelessness for healthcare based on their need and capacity to access healthcare.
Included papers were primary research, published in the English language, participants were experiencing homelessness and aged over 18 years at the time of the study, a vulnerability index was used in the study, sample size was greater than 30, and the study had a health focus. Databases searched were MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science, between January-April 2020. The Joanna Briggs Appraisal criteria were used to quality appraise the included studies. Results were synthesised narratively.
Six papers were included, a total of 27,509 participants. The reported use of the indices varied; they included screening and profiling homeless populations, comparing homeless populations, and two studies evaluated the predictive capacity, reliability and validity of the indices. One vulnerability index focused on screening for human immunodeficiency virus, one used a 50-item index and four used a nine-item index. No direct health outcomes were reported from applying the vulnerability indices. The studies identified limitations of using vulnerability indices, including the potential bias of relying on self-reported data and two studies highlighted the need for further psychometric testing to ensure validity and reliability of the indices.
The sample of included studies was small. Vulnerability indices are reportedly a useful and easily accessible method of gaining valuable data on the health status and health needs of people experiencing homelessness. The variety of characteristics included in the vulnerability indices suggests the importance of tailoring vulnerability indices to the needs of the population to which it is to be applied. Conducting appropriate psychometric testing is critical so that an index can be used to accurately inform decision making and accurately prioritise people experiencing homelessness who are most at risk of mortality and morbidity. A specific tool that prioritises people experiencing homelessness for access to health care is not yet available. The review was funded by a St Vincent's Network Inclusive Health grant.
本研究旨在调查现有脆弱性指数评估的特征,以及将其应用于无家可归者所取得的健康结果。本研究是开发和实施一种新工具的一部分,该工具旨在根据无家可归者获得医疗保健的需求和能力对其进行优先排序。
纳入的文献为原始研究,发表于英文期刊,研究对象为无家可归者,且研究时年龄大于 18 岁,研究中使用了脆弱性指数,样本量大于 30,且研究具有健康侧重点。检索的数据库包括 MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、Scopus、PubMed 和 Web of Science,检索时间为 2020 年 1 月至 4 月。使用 Joanna Briggs 评估标准对纳入的研究进行质量评估。结果以叙述性方式进行综合。
纳入了 6 篇文献,共涉及 27509 名参与者。所报道的指数使用情况各不相同;它们包括筛查和分析无家可归人群、比较无家可归人群,以及两项研究评估了指数的预测能力、可靠性和有效性。一个脆弱性指数专门用于筛查人类免疫缺陷病毒,一个使用了 50 项指标,四个使用了 9 项指标。应用脆弱性指数后并未直接报告健康结果。这些研究发现使用脆弱性指数存在局限性,包括依赖自我报告数据可能存在偏见,两项研究强调需要进一步进行心理测量测试,以确保指数的有效性和可靠性。
纳入研究的样本量较小。脆弱性指数是一种有用且易于获取的方法,可以获得无家可归者健康状况和健康需求的有价值数据。脆弱性指数中包含的特征种类繁多,这表明根据其应用人群的需求定制脆弱性指数非常重要。进行适当的心理测量测试至关重要,以便指数能够准确地为决策提供信息,并准确地对最有可能死亡和患病的无家可归者进行优先级排序。目前尚无专门用于优先安排无家可归者获得医疗保健的工具。本研究由圣文森特网络包容性健康基金资助。