• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项范围审查研究了无家可归者在寻求医疗保健时的患者体验以及对他们重要的因素。

A scoping review examining patient experience and what matters to people experiencing homelessness when seeking healthcare.

机构信息

St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 20;24(1):492. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10971-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-10971-8
PMID:38643146
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11031864/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Homelessness is associated with significant health disparities. Conventional health services often fail to address the unique needs and lived experience of homeless individuals and fail to include participatory design when planning health services. This scoping review aimed to examine areas of patient experience that are most frequently reported by people experiencing homelessness when seeking and receiving healthcare, and to identify existing surveys used to measure patient experience for this cohort.

METHODS

A scoping review was undertaken reported according to the PRISMA-ScR 2020 Statement. Databases were searched on 1 December 2022: MEDLINE, EMBASE, APA PsychINFO and CINAHL. Included studies focused on people experiencing homelessness, healthcare services and patient experience, primary research, published in English from 2010. Qualitative papers and findings were extracted and synthesized against a modified framework based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines for care for people experiencing homelessness, the Institute of Medicine Framework and Lachman's multidimensional quality model. People with lived experience of homelessness were employed as part of the research team.

RESULTS

Thirty-two studies were included. Of these, 22 were qualitative, seven quantitative and three mixed methods, from the United States of America (n = 17), United Kingdom (n = 5), Australia (n = 5) and Canada (n = 4). Health services ranged from primary healthcare to outpatient management, acute care, emergency care and hospital based healthcare. In qualitative papers, the domains of 'accessible and timely', 'person-centred', and values of 'dignity and respect' and 'kindness with compassion' were most prevalent. Among the three patient experience surveys identified, 'accessible and timely' and 'person-centred' were the most frequent domains. The least frequently highlighted domains and values were 'equitable' and 'holistic'. No questions addressed the 'safety' domain.

CONCLUSIONS

The Primary Care Quality-Homeless questionnaire best reflected the priorities for healthcare provision that were highlighted in the qualitative studies of people experiencing homelessness. The most frequently cited domains and values that people experiencing homelessness expressed as important when seeking healthcare were reflected in each of the three survey tools to varying degrees. Findings suggest that the principles of 'Kindness and compassion' require further emphasis when seeking feedback on healthcare experiences and the domains of 'safety', 'equitable', and 'efficiency' are not adequately represented in existing patient experience surveys.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76c6/11031864/db811aa89535/12913_2024_10971_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76c6/11031864/db811aa89535/12913_2024_10971_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76c6/11031864/db811aa89535/12913_2024_10971_Fig1_HTML.jpg
摘要

背景

无家可归与显著的健康差异有关。传统的卫生服务往往未能满足无家可归者的独特需求和生活体验,在规划卫生服务时也未能纳入参与式设计。本范围综述旨在研究无家可归者在寻求和接受医疗保健时最常报告的患者体验领域,并确定用于衡量这一人群患者体验的现有调查。

方法

根据 PRISMA-ScR 2020 声明进行了范围综述。于 2022 年 12 月 1 日在 MEDLINE、EMBASE、APA PsychINFO 和 CINAHL 数据库中进行了检索。纳入的研究侧重于无家可归者、医疗保健服务和患者体验、原始研究,并于 2010 年以后以英文发表。从国家卫生与保健卓越研究所(National Institute for Health and Care Excellence)针对无家可归者护理指南、医学研究所(Institute of Medicine)框架和拉赫曼多维质量模型中提取并综合了定性论文和发现。无家可归者的生活体验者作为研究团队的一部分参与其中。

结果

共纳入 32 项研究。其中,22 项为定性研究,7 项为定量研究,3 项为混合方法研究,来自美国(n=17)、英国(n=5)、澳大利亚(n=5)和加拿大(n=4)。卫生服务范围从初级保健到门诊管理、急性护理、急诊护理和医院内医疗保健。在定性论文中,“可及性和及时性”、“以患者为中心”以及“尊严和尊重”和“仁慈与同情”的价值观等领域最为普遍。在确定的三个患者体验调查中,“可及性和及时性”和“以患者为中心”是最常出现的领域。提及最少的领域和价值观是“公平”和“全面”。没有问题涉及“安全”领域。

结论

初级保健质量-无家可归者问卷最能反映无家可归者定性研究中强调的医疗服务提供重点。无家可归者在寻求医疗保健时最常提到的重要领域和价值观在三种调查工具中都有不同程度的反映。研究结果表明,在寻求医疗保健体验反馈时,“仁慈与同情”原则需要进一步强调,而现有患者体验调查中没有充分体现“安全”、“公平”和“效率”等领域。

相似文献

1
A scoping review examining patient experience and what matters to people experiencing homelessness when seeking healthcare.一项范围审查研究了无家可归者在寻求医疗保健时的患者体验以及对他们重要的因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 20;24(1):492. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10971-8.
2
Scoping review: Scope of practice of nurse-led services and access to care for people experiencing homelessness.范围综述:护理主导服务的实践范围以及无家可归者获得护理的途径。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Nov;78(11):3587-3606. doi: 10.1111/jan.15387. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
3
Tackling Inequalities in Access to Medicines for People Experiencing Homelessness: A Meta-Ethnography and Qualitative Systematic Review.解决无家可归者获得药物方面的不平等问题:元民族志学和定性系统评价。
Health Expect. 2024 Oct;27(5):e70076. doi: 10.1111/hex.70076.
4
Healthcare needs, expectations and experiences of people experiencing homelessness in Western Switzerland: a qualitative and quantitative descriptive study.瑞士西部无家可归者的医疗保健需求、期望和经历:一项定性和定量描述性研究。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2025 Feb 4;155:3659. doi: 10.57187/s.3659.
5
Cardiovascular disease management and healthcare delivery for people experiencing homelessness: a scoping review.心血管疾病管理和无家可归者的医疗保健服务提供:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 17;24(1):1080. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11503-0.
6
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
7
Exploring the experiences of changes to support access to primary health care services and the impact on the quality and safety of care for homeless people during the COVID-19 pandemic: a study protocol for a qualitative mixed methods approach.探索在 COVID-19 大流行期间改变对初级卫生保健服务支持的体验以及对无家可归者护理质量和安全的影响:一项定性混合方法研究方案。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Jan 10;20(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01364-4.
8
International evidence on lived experiences of trauma during homelessness and effects on mental health including substance use: a co-produced qualitative systematic review.国际上关于无家可归期间创伤经历及其对心理健康的影响的证据,包括物质使用:共同制作的定性系统评价。
Lancet. 2023 Nov;402 Suppl 1:S18. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02075-5.
9
Building multi-professional UK partnerships and networks to improve access to palliative care for people experiencing homelessness.建立英国多专业伙伴关系和网络,以改善无家可归者获得姑息治疗的机会。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Mar 12:1-11. doi: 10.3310/JWRG6933.
10
Experience of healthcare among the homeless and vulnerably housed a qualitative study: opportunities for equity-oriented health care.无家可归者和弱势住房者的医疗保健体验:以公平为导向的医疗保健机会。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jul 1;18(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1004-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring ways to improve healthcare service access for people experiencing homelessness in Manchester, UK.探索改善英国曼彻斯特无家可归者获得医疗服务途径的方法。
Health Promot Int. 2025 Jul 1;40(4). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaf108.
2
Evidence of tuberculosis treatment outcomes among people experiencing homelessness: a scoping review.无家可归者结核病治疗结果的证据:一项范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 2;25(1):497. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12230-w.
3
A systematic literature review on initiatives to involve children and adolescents in evaluating their hospitalization experience.

本文引用的文献

1
Previous Health Care Experiences' Influence on Health Care Perceptions Among Residents of Six Homeless Shelters in Seattle, Washington, July-October 2021.2021年7月至10月,以往医疗保健经历对华盛顿州西雅图市六个无家可归者收容所居民医疗保健认知的影响
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2023 Jul 18;10(3):111-120. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.2012. eCollection 2023 Summer.
2
The role of socioeconomic factors as barriers to patient reported outcome measure completion following lumbar spine fusion.社会经济因素在腰椎融合术后患者报告结局测量完成方面的障碍作用。
Spine J. 2023 Oct;23(10):1531-1539. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.05.003. Epub 2023 May 18.
3
一项关于让儿童和青少年参与评估其住院体验的举措的系统文献综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 26;25(1):429. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12486-2.
4
Factors influencing satisfaction with medical services in medically underserved populations: an analytical cross-sectional study at a free medical clinic in the Republic of Korea.影响医疗服务不足人群对医疗服务满意度的因素:韩国一家免费诊所的分析性横断面研究
Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2025 Apr;16(2):181-191. doi: 10.24171/j.phrp.2024.0325. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
5
Cancer care in people experiencing homelessness: identifying key issues, challenges, and facilitators.为无家可归者提供癌症护理:识别关键问题、挑战和促进因素。
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Jul 25;74(745):342-343. doi: 10.3399/bjgp24X738801. Print 2024 Aug.
Gender Minority Youth Experiencing Homelessness and Corresponding Health Disparities.
性别少数青年的无家可归经历和相应的健康差距。
J Adolesc Health. 2023 May;72(5):763-769. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.11.229. Epub 2023 Jan 14.
4
Perceptions of mobile and acute healthcare services among people experiencing homelessness.无家可归者对流动和急症医疗服务的看法。
Public Health Nurs. 2023 Jan;40(1):36-43. doi: 10.1111/phn.13150. Epub 2022 Nov 13.
5
What do Veterans with homeless experience want us to know that we are not asking? A qualitative content analysis of comments from a national survey of healthcare experience.有 homeless experience 的 Veterans 希望我们知道哪些我们没有问到的事情?一项全国性医疗体验调查中评论的定性内容分析。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e5027-e5037. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13918. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
6
Patients' and kin's perspective on healthcare quality compared to Lachman's multidimensional quality model: Focus group interviews.患者和家属对医疗质量的看法与 Lachman 的多维质量模型相比:焦点小组访谈。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Oct;105(10):3151-3159. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.07.007. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
7
A systematic review of the effect of stigma on the health of people experiencing homelessness.系统评价耻辱感对无家可归者健康的影响。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):2128-2141. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13884. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
8
Perceived safety in community and service settings among young adults experiencing homelessness: Differences by sexual and gender identity.社区和服务环境中无家可归的年轻成年人的感知安全性:基于性和性别认同的差异。
Am J Community Psychol. 2022 Dec;70(3-4):340-351. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12606. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
9
A codevelopment process to advance methods for the use of patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures with people who are homeless and experience chronic illness.一个共同制定的流程,旨在推进将患者报告的结局测量和患者报告的体验测量应用于无家可归且患有慢性病的人群的方法。
Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2264-2274. doi: 10.1111/hex.13489. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
10
Development and Initial Evaluation of a Nurse-Led Healthcare Clinic for Homeless and At-Risk Populations in Tasmania, Australia: A Collaborative Initiative.澳大利亚塔斯马尼亚州面向无家可归和弱势群体的护士主导医疗诊所的开发与初步评估:一项合作举措。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 3;18(23):12770. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312770.