Suppr超能文献

英格兰智障人群的死亡率差异和贫困状况:2000-2019 年。

Mortality disparities and deprivation among people with intellectual disabilities in England: 2000-2019.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK

Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2022 Feb;76(2):168-174. doi: 10.1136/jech-2021-216798. Epub 2021 Jul 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The effect of policy initiatives and deprivation on mortality disparities in people with intellectual disabilities is not clear.

METHODS

An electronic health record observational study of linked primary care data in England from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink and the Office for National Statistics deaths data from 2000 to 2019 was undertaken. All-cause and cause-specific mortality for people with intellectual disabilities were calculated by gender and deprivation status (index of multiple deprivation quintile) using direct age-standardised mortality rates (all years) and ratios (SMR; 2000-2009 vs 2010-2019).

RESULTS

Among 1.0 million patients (n=33 844 with intellectual disability; n=980 586 general population without intellectual disability), differential mortality was consistently higher in people with intellectual disabilities and there was no evidence of attenuation over time. There was a dose-response relationship between all-cause mortality and lower deprivation quintile in the general population which was not observed in people with intellectual disabilities. Cause-specific SMR were consistent in both the 2000-2009 and 2010-2019 calendar periods, with a threefold increased risk of death in both males and females with intellectual disabilities (SMR ranges: 2.91-3.51). Mortality was highest from epilepsy (SMR ranges: 22.90-52.74) and aspiration pneumonia (SMR ranges: 19.31-35.44). SMRs were disproportionately high for people with intellectual disabilities living in the least deprived areas.

CONCLUSIONS

People with intellectual disabilities in England continue to experience significant mortality disparities and there is no evidence that the situation is improving. Deprivation indicators may not be effective for targeting vulnerable individuals.

摘要

背景

政策举措和贫困对智障人士死亡率差异的影响尚不清楚。

方法

对英格兰临床实践研究数据库和国家统计局死亡数据中 2000 年至 2019 年的链接初级保健数据进行了电子健康记录观察性研究。使用直接年龄标准化死亡率(所有年份)和比值(SMR;2000-2009 年与 2010-2019 年)计算所有原因和特定原因死亡率,按性别和贫困状况(多重剥夺五分位数指数)对智障人士进行分类。

结果

在 100 万名患者(n=33844 名智障患者;n=980586 名无智障的普通人群)中,智障患者的死亡率始终较高,且随时间推移并无减弱趋势。在普通人群中,全因死亡率与较低的贫困五分位数之间存在剂量反应关系,但在智障患者中并未观察到这种关系。在 2000-2009 年和 2010-2019 年两个日历期间,特定原因的 SMR 均保持一致,智障男性和女性的死亡风险均增加了两倍(SMR 范围:2.91-3.51)。癫痫(SMR 范围:22.90-52.74)和吸入性肺炎(SMR 范围:19.31-35.44)导致的死亡率最高。生活在最不贫困地区的智障人士的 SMR 过高。

结论

英格兰的智障人士继续面临显著的死亡率差异,且没有证据表明情况正在改善。贫困指标可能无法有效地针对弱势群体。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验