Hausmann D, Daniel W G, Nikutta P, Siart A, Lichtlen P R
Kardiologische Abteilung, Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover.
Z Kardiol. 1987 Nov;76(11):682-7.
We reevaluated a previously described M-mode echocardiographic method for the assessment of the hemodynamic severity of an isolated or predominant, advanced aortic stenosis in 89 adult patients without significant associated coronary artery disease. Endsystolic left ventricular wall thickness and diameters were measured using the echocardiogram and left ventricular systolic pressure was calculated under the assumption of a constant left ventricular wall stress (235 mm Hg); the results were compared with the pressure values measured during catheterization. The correlation between the echocardiographic and the invasively determined pressure values was poor and without any clinical relevance; r-values ranged between 0.14 and 0.46. Calculated left ventricular wall stress showed a large scatter with values between 126 mm Hg and 468 mm Hg. Our data indicate that in adults with aortic stenosis, M-mode echocardiographic determination of the hemodynamic severity is not possible, and the assumption of a constant left ventricular wall stress in these patients is misleading.
我们重新评估了一种先前描述的M型超声心动图方法,用于评估89例无显著相关冠状动脉疾病的成年患者中孤立性或主要的晚期主动脉瓣狭窄的血流动力学严重程度。使用超声心动图测量收缩末期左心室壁厚度和直径,并在左心室壁应力恒定(235 mmHg)的假设下计算左心室收缩压;将结果与导管插入术期间测量的压力值进行比较。超声心动图测定值与有创测定的压力值之间的相关性较差,且无任何临床相关性;r值在0.14至0.46之间。计算出的左心室壁应力显示出较大的离散度,值在126 mmHg至468 mmHg之间。我们的数据表明,在患有主动脉瓣狭窄的成年人中,无法通过M型超声心动图确定血流动力学严重程度,并且在这些患者中假设左心室壁应力恒定会产生误导。