Sampath Venkatesh, Ramchandran Ramani
Division of Neonatology, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, United States.
Department of Pediatrics, University of Missouri at Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, United States.
Front Pediatr. 2021 Jun 24;9:650302. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.650302. eCollection 2021.
The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the necessity for scientists from diverse disciplines to collaboratively mitigate the singular calamity facing humanity this century. The ability of researchers to combine exponential advances in technology and scientific acumen has resulted in landmark discoveries in pediatric research and is surmounting the COVID-19 challenge. Several of these discoveries exist in a realm of research that is not classically "basic" or "clinical." Translational research characterizes this domain partially, but does not fully capture the integrated research approaches that have spurred these discoveries. Herein, we share our perspective on the common themes underpinning the basic and clinical research. We also highlight major differences in the scope, emphasis, approach, and limitations of basic and clinical research that impede multi-disciplinary approaches that facilitate truly transformative research. These differences in research thinking and methodology are ingrained during training wherein the limitations of the chosen discipline, and strengths of alternate disciplines are not adequately explored. Insular approaches are particularly limited in impacting complex diseases pathophysiology in the era of precision medicine. We propose that integration of -omics technologies, systems biology, adaptive clinical trial designs, humanized animal models, and precision pre-clinical model systems must be incorporated into research training of future scientists. Several initiatives from the NIH and other institutions are facilitating such broad-based "research without frontiers" training that paves the way for seamless, multi-disciplinary, research. Such efforts become "transformative" when scientific challenges are tackled in partnership with a willingness to share ideas, tackle challenges, and develop tools/models from the very beginning.
新冠疫情凸显了不同学科的科学家合作应对本世纪人类面临的这场独特灾难的必要性。研究人员将技术的指数级进步与科学洞察力相结合的能力,已在儿科研究中取得了具有里程碑意义的发现,并正在战胜新冠挑战。其中一些发现存在于一个并非传统意义上“基础”或“临床”的研究领域。转化研究部分地描述了这个领域,但并未完全涵盖促成这些发现的综合研究方法。在此,我们分享我们对支撑基础研究和临床研究的共同主题的看法。我们还强调了基础研究和临床研究在范围、重点、方法和局限性方面的主要差异,这些差异阻碍了促进真正变革性研究的多学科方法。这些研究思维和方法上的差异在培训过程中就已根深蒂固,在此过程中,所选学科的局限性以及其他学科的优势并未得到充分探索。在精准医学时代,孤立的方法在影响复杂疾病的病理生理学方面尤其有限。我们建议,必须将 -omics 技术、系统生物学、适应性临床试验设计、人源化动物模型和精准临床前模型系统纳入未来科学家的研究培训中。美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)和其他机构的多项举措正在推动这种基础广泛的“无国界研究”培训,为无缝的多学科研究铺平道路。当与愿意从一开始就分享想法、应对挑战并开发工具/模型的伙伴关系一起应对科学挑战时,这些努力就会变得“具有变革性”。