Kryzauskas Marius, Degutyte Austeja Elzbieta, Abeciunas Vilius, Lukenaite Beatrice, Jasiunas Eugenijus, Poskus Eligijus, Strupas Kestutis, Poskus Tomas
Clinic of Gastroenterology, Nephro-Urology, and Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Visc Med. 2021 Jun;37(3):189-197. doi: 10.1159/000510660. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Anastomotic leakage remains the most devastating postoperative complication in colorectal surgery. The mechanical integrity of the newly formed colorectal anastomosis can be evaluated by visual inspection intraoperatively; both air leak and liquid leak tests are also used to evaluate the integrity of stapled colorectal anastomoses. It is not clear whether double-stapled anastomoses are more prone to leaks than single-stapled anastomoses. The aim of our study was to compare the methylene blue and the air leak test in the experimental setting of single-stapled and double-stapled porcine bowels.
Twenty-four distal colons were excised from slaughtered pigs without delay. The proximal bowel end was closed with a linear stapler using blue cartridges. The bowels were randomly divided into single-stapled or double-stapled groups. Air leak and methylene blue leak tests were performed. A digital pressure monitor with a gradual pressure increase function was used to both gradually increase pressure within the bowel and to determine the pressure at which the stapler line disintegrated.
Air leakage occurred at a mean pressure of 51.62 (±16.60) mm Hg and methylene blue leakage occurred at 46.54 (±16.78) mm Hg ( = 0.31). The air and methylene blue leaks occurred at comparable pressures in single-stapled bowels and in double-stapled bowels (47.21 [±14.02] mm Hg vs. 50.96 [±19.15] mm Hg, = 0.6).
The methylene blue solution leak test is not inferior to the air leak test. There is no significant difference in bursting pressure between single-stapled and double-stapled anastomoses.
背景/目的:吻合口漏仍然是结直肠手术中最具破坏性的术后并发症。新形成的结直肠吻合口的机械完整性可在术中通过肉眼检查进行评估;空气泄漏试验和液体泄漏试验也用于评估吻合器吻合的结直肠吻合口的完整性。尚不清楚双吻合器吻合是否比单吻合器吻合更容易发生渗漏。本研究的目的是在单吻合器和双吻合器猪肠的实验环境中比较亚甲蓝试验和空气泄漏试验。
立即从屠宰的猪身上切除24段远端结肠。近端肠端用蓝色钉仓的直线切割吻合器关闭。将肠随机分为单吻合器组或双吻合器组。进行空气泄漏试验和亚甲蓝泄漏试验。使用具有逐渐增加压力功能的数字压力监测器逐渐增加肠内压力,并确定吻合线崩解时的压力。
空气泄漏发生时的平均压力为51.62(±16.60)mmHg,亚甲蓝泄漏发生时的平均压力为46.54(±16.78)mmHg(P = 0.31)。单吻合器肠和双吻合器肠中空气和亚甲蓝泄漏发生时的压力相当(47.21[±14.02]mmHg对50.96[±19.15]mmHg,P = 0.6)。
亚甲蓝溶液泄漏试验不亚于空气泄漏试验。单吻合器吻合和双吻合器吻合的破裂压力无显著差异。