Department of Microbiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Departamento de Clínica E Cirurgia Veterinárias, Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Braz J Microbiol. 2021 Dec;52(4):1745-1753. doi: 10.1007/s42770-021-00571-7. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
Historically, clinical microbiological laboratories have often relied on isolation of pure cultures and phenotypic testing to identify microorganisms. These clinical tests are often based on specific biochemical reactions, growth characteristics, colony morphology, and other physiological aspects. The features used for identification in clinical laboratories are highly conserved and specific for a given group of microbes. We speculate that these features might be the result of evolutionary selection and thus may reflect aspects of the life cycle of the organism and pathogenesis. Indeed, several of the metabolic pathways targeted by diagnostic tests in some cases may represent mechanisms for host colonization or pathogenesis. Examples include, but are not restricted to, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Salmonella enterica, Shigella spp., and enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC). Here, we provide an overview of how some common tests reflect molecular mechanisms of bacterial pathogenesis.
从历史上看,临床微生物学实验室通常依赖于纯培养物的分离和表型检测来鉴定微生物。这些临床检测通常基于特定的生化反应、生长特性、菌落形态和其他生理方面。临床实验室中用于鉴定的特征高度保守,并且针对特定的微生物群。我们推测这些特征可能是进化选择的结果,因此可能反映了生物体生命周期和发病机制的某些方面。事实上,一些诊断测试针对的代谢途径在某些情况下可能代表宿主定植或发病机制的机制。例如,但不限于金黄色葡萄球菌、铜绿假单胞菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、肠炎沙门氏菌、志贺氏菌和肠侵袭性大肠杆菌(EIEC)。在这里,我们概述了一些常见测试如何反映细菌发病机制的分子机制。