Rheumatology Unit, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.
Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University Hospital Príncipe de Asturias, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 12;16(7):e0253932. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253932. eCollection 2021.
To test the hypothesis that the use of chondroitin sulfate (CS) or glucosamine reduces the risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
Case-control study nested in a primary cohort of patients aged 40 to 99 years, using the database BIFAP during the 2002-2015 study period. From this cohort, we identified incident cases of AMI and randomly selected five controls per case, matched by exact age, gender, and index date. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were computed through a conditional logistic regression. Only new users of CS or glucosamine were considered.
A total of 23,585 incident cases of AMI and 117,405 controls were included. Of them, 89 cases (0.38%) and 757 controls (0.64%) were current users of CS at index date, yielding an AOR of 0.57 (95%CI: 0.46-0.72). The reduced risk among current users was observed in both short-term (<365 days, AOR = 0.58; 95%CI: 0.45-0.75) and long-term users (>364 days AOR = 0.56; 95%CI:0.36-0.87), in both sexes (men, AOR = 0.52; 95%CI:0.38-0.70; women, AOR = 0.65; 95%CI:0.46-0.91), in individuals over or under 70 years of age (AOR = 0.54; 95%CI:0.38-0.77, and AOR = 0.61; 95%CI:0.45-0.82, respectively) and in individuals at intermediate (AOR = 0.65; 95%CI:0.48-0.91) and high cardiovascular risk (AOR = 0.48; 95%CI:0.27-0.83), but not in those at low risk (AOR = 1.11; 95%CI:0.48-2.56). In contrast, the current use of glucosamine was not associated with either increased or decreased risk of AMI (AOR = 0.86; 95%CI:0.66-1.08).
Our results support a cardioprotective effect of CS, while glucosamine seems to be neutral. The protection was remarkable among subgroups at high cardiovascular risk.
检验硫酸软骨素(CS)或氨基葡萄糖使用降低急性心肌梗死(AMI)风险的假说。
对 2002-2015 年期间 BIFAP 数据库中的年龄在 40 至 99 岁的患者初级队列进行巢式病例对照研究,从该队列中确定 AMI 的新发病例,并随机选择每个病例的 5 名对照,通过精确年龄、性别和索引日期进行匹配。通过条件逻辑回归计算调整后的比值比(AOR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。仅考虑 CS 或氨基葡萄糖的新使用者。
共纳入 23585 例 AMI 新发病例和 117405 例对照。其中,89 例(0.38%)和 757 例(0.64%)在索引日期时为 CS 的现用者,AOR 为 0.57(95%CI:0.46-0.72)。在短期(<365 天,AOR=0.58;95%CI:0.45-0.75)和长期(>364 天,AOR=0.56;95%CI:0.36-0.87)使用者、男性(AOR=0.52;95%CI:0.38-0.70;女性,AOR=0.65;95%CI:0.46-0.91)、70 岁以上(AOR=0.54;95%CI:0.38-0.77,和 AOR=0.61;95%CI:0.45-0.82)和 70 岁以下(AOR=0.65;95%CI:0.48-0.91)和中等(AOR=0.65;95%CI:0.48-0.91)和高心血管风险(AOR=0.48;95%CI:0.27-0.83)个体中,现用 CS 与 AMI 的风险增加或降低无关(AOR=0.86;95%CI:0.66-1.08)。
我们的结果支持 CS 的心脏保护作用,而氨基葡萄糖似乎没有这种作用。在心血管高风险亚组中,这种保护作用非常显著。