Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira (IMIP), Department of Post-graduation, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Hospital das Cl.ínicas, Department of Anesthesia, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2023 Jul-Aug;73(4):491-499. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.06.015. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
Thyromental height (TMH) was first reported as a great single test for prediction of difficult laryngoscopies, although further studies have shown variable estimates of its accuracy. We thus performed this meta-analysis to summarize the predictive values of TMH mainly for prediction of difficult laryngoscopies.
A search in PubMed, EMBASE, LILACS, and Scielo was conducted in June 2020. We included prospective cohorts fully reported with patients ... 16 years old, providing data on predictive values of TMH for prediction of either difficult laryngoscopies or difficult intubations. Diagnostic properties and association between TMH and Cormack and Lehanes...s classification by direct laryngoscopy were evaluated. A random-effects meta-analysis using hierarchical models was performed.
Eight studies evaluating 2844 patients were included. All included studies had high risk of bias and low concern regarding applicability. There was significant heterogeneity among the studies. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and positive (LR+) and negative (LR-) likelihood ratios were as follows: DOR, 57.94 (95% CI: 18.19...184.55); LR+, 11.32 (95% CI: 4.28...29.92); and LR-, 0.23 (95% CI: 0.15...0.35). Summary sensitivity and specificity for studies with common threshold were 82.6 (95% CI: 74...88.8%) and 93.5 (95% CI: 79...98.2%), respectively. The estimated AUC was 81.1%.
TMH arises as a good predictor of difficult laryngoscopies in adult patients from diverse populations presenting better predictive values than most previously reported bedside tests. However, the high risk of bias throughout the studies may have skewed the results of the individual research as well as the summary points of the present meta-analysis.
甲状软骨-颏骨间距(TMH)首次被报道为预测困难喉镜检查的单一重要指标,尽管进一步的研究表明其准确性存在差异。因此,我们进行了这项荟萃分析,主要总结 TMH 对预测困难喉镜检查的预测价值。
2020 年 6 月,我们在 PubMed、EMBASE、LILACS 和 Scielo 中进行了检索。我们纳入了前瞻性队列研究,这些研究均有 16 岁以上患者,提供了 TMH 预测值用于预测困难喉镜检查或困难插管的相关数据。使用直接喉镜评估 TMH 与 Cormack 和 Lehanes 分类之间的诊断特性和关联。采用分层模型进行随机效应荟萃分析。
纳入了 8 项评估 2844 例患者的研究。所有纳入的研究均存在高偏倚风险和低应用关注。研究之间存在显著异质性。汇总的诊断优势比(DOR)和阳性(LR+)和阴性(LR-)似然比如下:DOR,57.94(95% CI:18.19...184.55);LR+,11.32(95% CI:4.28...29.92);LR-,0.23(95% CI:0.15...0.35)。具有常见阈值的研究汇总敏感性和特异性分别为 82.6%(95% CI:74%...88.8%)和 93.5%(95% CI:79%...98.2%)。估计的 AUC 为 81.1%。
TMH 是预测来自不同人群的成年患者困难喉镜检查的一个很好的指标,其预测价值优于大多数先前报道的床边检查。然而,整个研究中的高偏倚风险可能会扭曲个别研究以及本荟萃分析的汇总结果。