Suppr超能文献

新型 4Fr 塑料支架联合 0.025 英寸导丝行胰管支架置入术的可行性。

The feasibility of pancreatic duct stenting using a novel 4-Fr plastic stent with a 0.025-in. guidewire.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan.

Center for Gastroenterology, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 12;11(1):14285. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92811-x.

Abstract

Pancreatic duct stenting is a well-established method for reducing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis. However, there is no consensus on the optimal type of plastic stent. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a new 4-Fr plastic stent for pancreatic duct stenting. Forty-nine consecutive patients who placed the 4-Fr stent into the pancreatic duct (4Fr group) were compared with 187 consecutive patients who placed a conventional 5-Fr stent (control group). The primary outcome was technical success. Complications rate, including post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) were the secondary outcomes. Propensity score matching was introduced to reduce selection bias. The technical success rate was 100% in the 4Fr group and 97.9% in the control group (p = 0.315). Post-ERCP amylase level was significantly lower in the 4-Fr group than the control group before propensity score matching (p = 0.006), though without statistical significance after propensity score matching (p = 0.298). The rate of PEP in the 4Fr group (6.1%) was lower than the control group (15.5%), though without statistical significance before (p = 0.088) and after (p = 1.00) propensity score matching. Pancreatic duct stenting using a novel 4-Fr plastic stent would be at least similar or more feasible and safe compared to the conventional plastic stent.

摘要

胰管支架置入术是降低内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)后胰腺炎的一种成熟方法。然而,对于最佳的塑料支架类型尚未达成共识。本研究旨在评估一种新型 4Fr 塑料支架用于胰管支架置入的可行性和安全性。49 例连续患者将 4Fr 支架置入胰管(4Fr 组)与 187 例连续患者将常规 5Fr 支架置入胰管(对照组)进行比较。主要结局为技术成功率。并发症发生率,包括 ERCP 后胰腺炎(PEP)为次要结局。采用倾向评分匹配法来减少选择偏倚。4Fr 组的技术成功率为 100%,对照组为 97.9%(p=0.315)。在倾向评分匹配前,4Fr 组 ERCP 后淀粉酶水平明显低于对照组(p=0.006),但匹配后无统计学意义(p=0.298)。4Fr 组 PEP 发生率(6.1%)低于对照组(15.5%),但在倾向评分匹配前(p=0.088)和后(p=1.00)均无统计学意义。与传统塑料支架相比,新型 4Fr 塑料支架胰管支架置入术至少具有相似或更高的可行性和安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9a0/8275660/a789bc267db0/41598_2021_92811_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验