Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
User Centered Design Inc, Ashburn, VA, United States.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jul 2;9(7):e28175. doi: 10.2196/28175.
Smartphone mobile apps are frequently used in standalone or multimodal smoking cessation interventions. However, factors that impede or improve app usage are poorly understood.
This study used the supportive accountability model to investigate factors that influence app usage in the context of a trial designed to reduce maternal smoking in low-income and predominantly minority communities.
We conducted a secondary analysis of data (N=181) from a randomized controlled trial that included a smoking cessation app (QuitPal-m). Supportive accountability was measured by the number of times a participant was advised by their cessation counselor to use QuitPal-m. Participants reported app use helpfulness and barriers. Investigators tracked reported phone and technical problems that impeded app use.
Most participants rated the app as very helpful (103/155, 66.5%), but daily use declined rapidly over time. App use was positively related to the level of perceived app helpfulness (P=.02) and education (P=.002) and inversely related to perceived barriers (P=.003), phone technical problems (P<.001), and cigarettes smoked per day at the end of treatment (P<.001). Participants used the app a greater proportion of the days following app advice than those preceding app advice (0.45 versus 0.34; P<.001). The positive relation between counselor app advice and app usage 24 hours after receiving advice was stronger among smokers with no plan to quit than in those planning to quit (P=.03), independent of education and phone or app problems.
Findings show the utility of supportive accountability for increasing smoking cessation app use in a predominantly low-income, minority population, particularly if quit motivation is low. Results also highlight the importance of addressing personal and phone/technical barriers in addition to adding supportive accountability.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02602288; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02602288.
智能手机移动应用程序经常被用于独立或多模式戒烟干预中。然而,阻碍或促进应用程序使用的因素还了解甚少。
本研究使用支持性问责模型,在一项旨在减少低收入和以少数民族为主的社区中孕妇吸烟的试验背景下,调查影响应用程序使用的因素。
我们对一项随机对照试验(包括戒烟应用程序 QuitPal-m)的数据(N=181)进行了二次分析。支持性问责制通过参与者被戒烟顾问建议使用 QuitPal-m 的次数来衡量。参与者报告了应用程序使用的帮助和障碍。研究人员跟踪了报告的手机和技术问题,这些问题阻碍了应用程序的使用。
大多数参与者将应用程序评为非常有帮助(103/155,66.5%),但随着时间的推移,每日使用量迅速下降。应用程序的使用与感知到的应用程序帮助程度呈正相关(P=.02),与教育程度呈正相关(P=.002),与感知到的障碍呈负相关(P=.003),与手机技术问题呈负相关(P<.001),与治疗结束时每天吸烟的数量呈负相关(P<.001)。在接受应用程序建议后,参与者在应用程序建议后的天数中使用应用程序的比例高于在应用程序建议前的天数(0.45 与 0.34;P<.001)。在没有戒烟计划的吸烟者中,顾问应用程序建议与应用程序使用之间的正相关关系比有戒烟计划的吸烟者更强(P=.03),这与教育程度和手机或应用程序问题无关。
研究结果表明,支持性问责制在以低收入和少数民族为主的人群中增加戒烟应用程序的使用具有实用性,尤其是在戒烟动机较低的情况下。研究结果还强调了除了增加支持性问责制之外,解决个人和手机/技术障碍的重要性。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02602288;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02602288。