• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当前对于 1 级前列腺癌分级分组的这种观念有多大的可靠性?

How Much Reliable Is the Current Belief on Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer?

机构信息

Department of Urology, International St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University, Incheon, South Korea.

Department of Hospital Pathology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Pathol Oncol Res. 2021 Apr 13;27:629489. doi: 10.3389/pore.2021.629489. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/pore.2021.629489
PMID:34257593
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8262215/
Abstract

To evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics of grade group 1 (GG1) prostate cancer in Korean populations. We retrospectively analyzed 492 consecutive radical prostatectomy specimens from our institution, which included those from 322 men with clinical GG1 and 170 with clinical GG2 tumors between years 2009 and 2018. The incidence of Gleason score (GS) upgrading, extraprostatic extension (EPE), and seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) were evaluated in patients with clinical GG1. In pathological GG1 cases, the distribution of adverse pathological features including EPE, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), perineural invasion (PNI), and biochemical recurrence (BCR) was analyzed. Altogether, 78 (24.2%) out of 322 men in the clinical GG1 group demonstrated upgrading of GS, including 19 men with pathological Gleason score 4 + 3 = 7 and 6 with ≥ pathological Gleason score 4 + 4 = 8 cases. EPE was found in 37 (11.5%) and 22 (8.9%) men in clinical GG1 and pathological GG1 group, respectively. The incidence of LVI and PNI in the pathological GG1 cases was 2.8% (n = 7) and 28.6% (n = 71), respectively. BCR was observed in 4 men in pathological GG1 T2 (n = 226) and 2 men in GG1 T3 (n = 22) group. When we compared the pathological features between pathological GG1 T3 vs. GG2 T2, there was no statistical differences in the incidence of LVI and PNI between the two groups. Contrary to the current concept that GG1 is almost always clinically insignificant, it seems that GG1 still possess its respectable position as a group of cancer with aggressiveness. These findings should be kept in mind when deciding on treatment options for prostate cancer patients in the Asian populations.

摘要

为了评估韩国人群中 1 级(GG1)前列腺癌的临床病理特征。我们回顾性分析了我院 492 例连续根治性前列腺切除术标本,其中包括 322 例临床 GG1 肿瘤和 170 例临床 GG2 肿瘤患者,时间范围为 2009 年至 2018 年。评估了临床 GG1 患者中 Gleason 评分(GS)升级、前列腺外扩展(EPE)和精囊侵犯(SVI)的发生率。在病理 GG1 病例中,分析了包括 EPE、脉管侵犯(LVI)、神经周围侵犯(PNI)和生化复发(BCR)在内的不良病理特征的分布。在临床 GG1 组的 322 名男性中,共有 78 名(24.2%)出现 GS 升级,其中 19 名男性病理 GS 为 4+3=7,6 名男性病理 GS≥4+4=8。临床 GG1 和病理 GG1 组分别有 37(11.5%)和 22(8.9%)名男性发生 EPE。病理 GG1 病例中 LVI 和 PNI 的发生率分别为 2.8%(n=7)和 28.6%(n=71)。在病理 GG1 T2(n=226)组中观察到 4 名男性发生 BCR,在 GG1 T3(n=22)组中观察到 2 名男性发生 BCR。当我们比较病理 GG1 T3 与 GG2 T2 之间的病理特征时,两组之间 LVI 和 PNI 的发生率没有统计学差异。与当前 GG1 几乎总是临床无意义的概念相反,似乎 GG1 仍然具有其作为一组具有侵袭性的癌症的可敬地位。在决定亚洲人群前列腺癌患者的治疗方案时,应牢记这些发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b312/8262215/211775f37c26/pore-27-629489-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b312/8262215/9a9dcdd09eb6/pore-27-629489-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b312/8262215/211775f37c26/pore-27-629489-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b312/8262215/9a9dcdd09eb6/pore-27-629489-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b312/8262215/211775f37c26/pore-27-629489-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
How Much Reliable Is the Current Belief on Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer?当前对于 1 级前列腺癌分级分组的这种观念有多大的可靠性?
Pathol Oncol Res. 2021 Apr 13;27:629489. doi: 10.3389/pore.2021.629489. eCollection 2021.
2
Risk of Biochemical Recurrence in Patients With Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer With Extraprostatic Extension Treated With Radical Prostatectomy.局限性前列腺癌伴包膜外侵犯患者行根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发风险。
J Urol. 2024 Mar;211(3):407-414. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003825. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
3
Prediction of pathological stage based on clinical stage, serum prostate-specific antigen, and biopsy Gleason score: Partin Tables in the contemporary era.基于临床分期、血清前列腺特异性抗原和活检Gleason评分预测病理分期:当代的Partin表
BJU Int. 2017 May;119(5):676-683. doi: 10.1111/bju.13573. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
4
Significance of perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.神经周围侵犯、脉管侵犯和高级别前列腺上皮内瘤变在机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中的意义。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Dec;18(13):3828-32. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1790-4. Epub 2011 Jun 10.
5
Perineural Invasion and Lymphovascular Invasion are Associated with Increased Risk of Biochemical Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.神经周围浸润和淋巴管浸润与接受根治性前列腺切除术患者生化复发风险增加相关。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Aug;23(8):2699-706. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5153-z. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
6
Percentage of Gleason pattern 4 and tumor volume predict adverse pathological stage and margin status at radical prostatectomy in grade Group 2 and grade Group 3 prostate cancers.在 2 级和 3 级前列腺癌中,Gleason 模式 4 的比例和肿瘤体积可预测根治性前列腺切除术后不良的病理分期和切缘状态。
Prostate. 2021 Sep;81(12):866-873. doi: 10.1002/pros.24183. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
7
Tertiary Gleason pattern in radical prostatectomy specimens is associated with worse outcomes than the next higher Gleason score group in localized prostate cancer.在局限性前列腺癌中,根治性前列腺切除术标本中的三级Gleason分级模式与下一个更高Gleason评分组相比,预后更差。
Urol Oncol. 2018 Apr;36(4):158.e1-158.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.12.003. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
8
Clinical outcome comparison of Grade Group 1 and Grade Group 2 prostate cancer with and without cribriform architecture at the time of radical prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术后有和无筛状结构的 Grade Group 1 和 Grade Group 2 前列腺癌的临床结局比较。
Histopathology. 2020 Apr;76(5):755-762. doi: 10.1111/his.14064.
9
Presence of high grade tertiary Gleason pattern upgrades the Gleason sum score and is inversely associated with biochemical recurrence-free survival.高级别三级 Gleason 模式的存在会提高 Gleason 总分,并与生化无复发生存率呈负相关。
Urol Oncol. 2013 Jan;31(1):93-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.10.009. Epub 2011 Feb 12.
10
Questioning the Status Quo: Should Gleason Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer be Considered a "Negative Core" in Pre-Radical Prostatectomy Risk Nomograms? An International Multicenter Analysis.质疑现状:在前列腺癌根治术前风险列线图中,Gleason 分级分组 1 是否应被视为“阴性核心”?一项国际多中心分析。
Urology. 2020 Mar;137:102-107. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.10.012. Epub 2019 Nov 6.

本文引用的文献

1
The Perineural Invasion Paradox: Is Perineural Invasion an Independent Prognostic Indicator of Biochemical Recurrence Risk in Patients With pT2N0R0 Prostate Cancer? A Multi-Institutional Study.神经周围浸润悖论:神经周围浸润是pT2N0R0前列腺癌患者生化复发风险的独立预后指标吗?一项多机构研究。
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2018 Sep 19;4(1):96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2018.09.006. eCollection 2019 Jan-Mar.
2
Perineural invasion as an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.神经周围浸润作为前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术或放疗后生化复发的独立预测因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2018 Feb 1;18(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12894-018-0319-6.
3
Incidence of Extraprostatic Extension at Radical Prostatectomy with Pure Gleason Score 3 + 3 = 6 (Grade Group 1) Cancer: Implications for Whether Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer Should be Renamed "Not Cancer" and for Selection Criteria for Active Surveillance.前列腺根治性切除术时单纯 Gleason 评分 3+3=6(分级分组 1)癌的前列腺外延伸发生率:对是否应将 Gleason 评分 6 前列腺癌重新命名为“非癌”以及主动监测选择标准的影响。
J Urol. 2018 Jun;199(6):1482-1487. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.067. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
4
Impact of lymphovascular invasion on lymph node metastasis for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with negative resection margin.对于切缘阴性的接受根治性前列腺切除术的患者,淋巴血管侵犯对淋巴结转移的影响。
BMC Cancer. 2017 May 8;17(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3307-4.
5
Population-Based Validation of the 2014 ISUP Gleason Grade Groups in Patients Treated With Radical Prostatectomy, Brachytherapy, External Beam Radiation, or no Local Treatment.接受根治性前列腺切除术、近距离放射治疗、外照射放疗或未接受局部治疗的患者中基于人群的2014版国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP) Gleason分级组验证
Prostate. 2017 May;77(6):686-693. doi: 10.1002/pros.23316. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
6
Extraprostatic Extension Is Extremely Rare for Contemporary Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer.对于当代 Gleason 评分 6 级前列腺癌,前列腺外延伸极为罕见。
Eur Urol. 2017 Sep;72(3):455-460. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.11.028. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
7
Validation of a Contemporary Five-tiered Gleason Grade Grouping Using Population-based Data.基于人群数据的当代五层 Gleason 分级分组的验证。
Eur Urol. 2017 May;71(5):760-763. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.11.031. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
8
Clinicopathological and Prognostic Factors in 106 Prostate Cancer Patients Aged ≤55 Years: A Single-Center Study in China.106例年龄≤55岁前列腺癌患者的临床病理特征及预后因素:一项中国单中心研究
Med Sci Monit. 2016 Oct 23;22:3935-3942. doi: 10.12659/msm.901040.
9
Does true Gleason pattern 3 merit its cancer descriptor?真正的 Gleason 模式 3 是否值得使用癌症描述符?
Nat Rev Urol. 2016 Sep;13(9):541-8. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.141. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
10
Is lymphovascular invasion a powerful predictor for biochemical recurrence in pT3 N0 prostate cancer? Results from the K-CaP database.淋巴管浸润是pT3 N0前列腺癌生化复发的有力预测指标吗?来自K-CaP数据库的结果。
Sci Rep. 2016 May 5;6:25419. doi: 10.1038/srep25419.