Suppr超能文献

基于临床分期、血清前列腺特异性抗原和活检Gleason评分预测病理分期:当代的Partin表

Prediction of pathological stage based on clinical stage, serum prostate-specific antigen, and biopsy Gleason score: Partin Tables in the contemporary era.

作者信息

Tosoian Jeffrey J, Chappidi Meera, Feng Zhaoyong, Humphreys Elizabeth B, Han Misop, Pavlovich Christian P, Epstein Jonathan I, Partin Alan W, Trock Bruce J

机构信息

The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2017 May;119(5):676-683. doi: 10.1111/bju.13573. Epub 2016 Jul 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To update the Partin Tables for prediction of pathological stage in the contemporary setting and examine trends in patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) over the past three decades.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2010 to October 2015, 4459 men meeting inclusion criteria underwent RP and pelvic lymphadenectomy for histologically confirmed prostate cancer at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. Preoperative clinical stage, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, and biopsy Gleason score (i.e. prognostic Grade Group) were used in a polychotomous logistic regression model to predict the probability of pathological outcomes categorised as: organ-confined (OC), extraprostatic extension (EPE), seminal vesicle involvement (SV+), or lymph node involvement (LN+). Preoperative characteristics and pathological findings in men treated with RP since 1983 were collected and clinical-pathological trends were described.

RESULTS

The median (range) age at surgery was 60 (34-77) years and the median (range) PSA level was 4.9 (0.1-125.0) ng/mL. The observed probabilities of pathological outcomes were: OC disease in 74%, EPE in 20%, SV+ in 4%, and LN+ in 2%. The probability of EPE increased substantially when biopsy Gleason score increased from 6 (Grade Group 1, GG1) to 3 + 4 (GG2), with smaller increases for higher grades. The probability of LN+ was substantially higher for biopsy Gleason score 9-10 (GG5) as compared to lower Gleason scores. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for binary logistic models predicting EPE, SV+, and LN+ vs OC were 0.724, 0.856, and 0.918, respectively. The proportion of men treated with biopsy Gleason score ≤6 cancer (GG1) was 47%, representing a substantial decrease from 63% in the previous cohort and 77% in 2000-2005. The proportion of men with OC cancer has remained similar during that time, equalling 73-74% overall. The proportions of men with SV+ (4.1% from 3.4%) and LN+ (2.3% from 1.4%) increased relative to the preceding era for the first time since the Partin Tables were introduced in 1993.

CONCLUSIONS

The Partin Tables remain a straightforward and accurate approach for projecting pathological outcomes based on readily available clinical data. Acknowledging these data are derived from a tertiary care referral centre, the proportion of men with OC disease has remained stable since 2000, despite a substantial decline in the proportion of men with biopsy Gleason score 6 (GG1). This is consistent with the notion that many men with Gleason score 6 (GG1) disease were over treated in previous eras.

摘要

目的

更新当代环境下用于预测病理分期的Partin表,并研究过去三十年接受根治性前列腺切除术(RP)患者的趋势。

患者与方法

2010年1月至2015年10月,4459名符合纳入标准的男性在约翰霍普金斯医院接受了RP及盆腔淋巴结清扫术,以确诊组织学前列腺癌。术前临床分期、血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平和活检Gleason评分(即预后分级组)用于多分类逻辑回归模型,以预测病理结果的概率,分为:器官局限性(OC)、前列腺外侵犯(EPE)、精囊受累(SV+)或淋巴结受累(LN+)。收集了自1983年以来接受RP治疗男性的术前特征和病理结果,并描述了临床病理趋势。

结果

手术时的中位(范围)年龄为60(34 - 77)岁,中位(范围)PSA水平为4.9(0.1 - 125.0)ng/mL。观察到的病理结果概率为:OC疾病占74%,EPE占20%,SV+占4%,LN+占2%。当活检Gleason评分从6(1级组,GG1)增加到3 + 4(GG2)时,EPE的概率大幅增加,更高分级时增加幅度较小。与较低Gleason评分相比,活检Gleason评分为9 - 10(GG5)时LN+的概率显著更高。预测EPE、SV+和LN+与OC的二元逻辑模型的受试者操作特征曲线下面积分别为0.724、0.856和0.918。活检Gleason评分≤6癌症(GG1)患者的比例为47%,与前一组的63%和2000 - 2005年的77%相比大幅下降。在此期间,OC癌症患者的比例保持相似,总体上为73 - 74%。自1993年引入Partin表以来,SV+(从3.4%升至4.1%)和LN+(从1.4%升至2.3%)患者的比例相对于前一时期首次增加。

结论

Partin表仍然是基于现成临床数据预测病理结果的一种直接且准确的方法。尽管活检Gleason评分为6(GG1)的男性比例大幅下降,但自2000年以来,OC疾病男性的比例保持稳定,这与许多Gleason评分为6(GG1)疾病的男性在过去被过度治疗的观点一致。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验