Zhou Shuailing, Krzton Ali, Gao Shuai, Guo Cheng, Xiang Zuofu
College of Life Science and Technology Central South University of Forestry & Technology Changsha China.
Department of Research and Instruction RBD Library Auburn University Auburn AL USA.
Ecol Evol. 2021 Jun 7;11(13):8957-8968. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7733. eCollection 2021 Jul.
Human activity is increasingly and persistently disturbing nature and wild animals. Affected wildlife adopts multiple strategies to deal with different human influences. To explore the effect of human activity on habitat utilization of Himalayan marmot (), habitat utilization patterns of three neighboring marmot populations in habitats affected differently by human activities were recorded and compared. We found that (a) distance between reproductive burrows (a represent of reproductive pairs) becomes shorter under the influence of human activities, and more burrows were dug as temporary shelters, resulting in shorter distance between those shelters and shorter distance flee to those shelters and, consequently, shorter flight initiation distance when threatened. More burrows that are closer to the disturbed habitats improve the ability to escape from threats. (b) Reproductive burrow site selection of the species is determined by the availability of mounds in the habitat, and breeding pairs selectively build reproductive (also the hibernation) burrows on mounds, potentially to improve surveillance when basking and the drainage of burrows. Human activities generally drive breeding pairs away from the road to dig their reproductive burrows likely to reduce disturbance from vehicles. However, even heavy human activity exerts no pressure on the distance of reproductive burrows from the road or the mound volume of the high disturbance population, potentially because mounds are the best burrowing site to reproduce and hibernate in the habitat. Marmots deal with disturbance by digging more burrows in the habitat to flee more effectively and building reproductive burrows on mounds to gain better vigilance and drainage efficiency.
人类活动正日益持续地干扰自然和野生动物。受影响的野生动物采取多种策略来应对不同的人类影响。为探究人类活动对喜马拉雅旱獭栖息地利用的影响,记录并比较了受人类活动影响程度不同的栖息地中三个相邻旱獭种群的栖息地利用模式。我们发现:(a)在人类活动影响下,繁殖洞穴(代表繁殖对)之间的距离变短,并且挖掘了更多洞穴作为临时庇护所,导致这些庇护所之间的距离变短,向这些庇护所逃窜的距离也变短,因此受到威胁时的飞行起始距离变短。更多靠近受干扰栖息地的洞穴提高了逃避威胁的能力。(b)该物种繁殖洞穴的选址取决于栖息地中土丘的可利用性,繁殖对会选择性地在土丘上建造繁殖(也是冬眠)洞穴,这可能是为了在晒太阳时提高警戒性以及改善洞穴排水。人类活动通常会驱使繁殖对远离道路去挖掘它们的繁殖洞穴,这可能是为了减少车辆的干扰。然而,即使是高强度的人类活动,对高干扰种群的繁殖洞穴与道路的距离或土丘体积也没有产生压力,这可能是因为土丘是该栖息地中繁殖和冬眠的最佳挖掘地点。旱獭通过在栖息地挖掘更多洞穴以更有效地逃窜,并在土丘上建造繁殖洞穴以获得更好的警戒性和排水效率来应对干扰。