Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Crit Care Med. 2021 Dec 1;49(12):2080-2089. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005107.
To identify whether factors associated with withholding extubation in the ICU also predict the risk of extubation failure.
Retrospective cohort study.
Eight medical-surgical ICUs in Toronto.
Adult patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation, with a first successful spontaneous breathing trial within 28 days of initial ICU admission.
None.
The primary end point had three mutually exclusive levels, including: 1) withholding extubation after a successful spontaneous breathing trial, 2) extubation failure within 48 hours, and 3) successful extubation. Among 9,910 patients, 38% of patients were not extubated within 24 hours of their first successful spontaneous breathing trial. A total of 12.9% of patients who were promptly extubated failed within the next 48 hours. Several discrepancies were evident in the association of factors with risk of withholding extubation and extubation failure. Specifically, both age and female sex were associated with withholding extubation (odds ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.03-1.11; and odds ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.02-1.26, respectively) but not a higher risk of failed extubation (odds ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.93-1.05; and odds ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.77-1.11, respectively). Conversely, both acute cardiovascular conditions and intubation for hypoxemic respiratory failure were associated with a higher risk of failed extubation (odds ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.06-1.66; and odds ratio, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.16-1.82, respectively) but not a higher odds of a withheld extubation attempt (odds ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.68-0.91; and odds ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.93-1.23, respectively).
Several factors showed discordance between the decision to withhold extubation and the risk of extubation failure. This discordance may lead to longer duration of mechanical ventilation or higher reintubation rates. Improving the decision-making behind extubation may help to reduce both exposure to invasive mechanical ventilation and extubation failure.
确定与 ICU 中拔管延迟相关的因素是否也可预测拔管失败的风险。
回顾性队列研究。
多伦多的 8 个内科-外科 ICU。
在 ICU 入住最初 28 天内经历首次成功自主呼吸试验的接受有创机械通气的成年患者。
无。
主要终点有三个互斥水平,包括:1)首次成功自主呼吸试验后延迟拔管,2)48 小时内拔管失败,3)成功拔管。在 9910 例患者中,38%的患者在首次成功自主呼吸试验后 24 小时内未拔管。在迅速拔管的患者中,有 12.9%的患者在接下来的 48 小时内失败。在与风险相关的因素与拔管延迟和拔管失败之间存在明显差异。具体而言,年龄和女性均与延迟拔管相关(比值比,1.07;95%CI,1.03-1.11;和比值比,1.13;95%CI,1.02-1.26),但与拔管失败的风险无关(比值比,0.99;95%CI,0.93-1.05;和比值比,0.93;95%CI,0.77-1.11)。相反,急性心血管疾病和因低氧性呼吸衰竭行插管均与拔管失败的风险增加相关(比值比,1.32;95%CI,1.06-1.66;和比值比,1.46;95%CI,1.16-1.82),但与拔管尝试延迟无关(比值比,0.79;95%CI,0.68-0.91;和比值比,1.07;95%CI,0.93-1.23)。
在决定延迟拔管和拔管失败风险方面,有几个因素存在差异。这种差异可能导致机械通气时间延长或再插管率升高。改善拔管决策可能有助于减少有创机械通气和拔管失败的发生。