Ran Yalin, Hu Suyuan, Yu Xiaohua, Li Renjun
Department of Pediatric, Chongqing Dadukou District People's Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Department of Pediatric, Chongqing Southeast Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jul 16;100(28):e26637. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026637.
Recent genetic association studies showed that there are contradictory results on the relationship between vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphisms and type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) risk in children. The purpose of this systematic review is to collect the currently available evidence to evaluate the relationship between VDR gene polymorphisms and the risk of T1DM in children.
Such medical databases as Wanfang Data, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chongqing VIP Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were extensively searched for relevant literatures published before June 2021 with the focus on the relationship between VDR gene polymorphisms and the risk of T1DM in children. The risk of bias was evaluated as per the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale by 2 independent researchers. Meta-analysis was performed to quantify the relationship between VDR gene polymorphisms and T1DM risk in children.
The results of this meta-analysis would be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.
The relationship between VDR gene polymorphisms and T1DM risk in children is explored via this meta-analysis.
Ethical approval was not required for this study. The systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, presented at conferences, and shared on social media platforms.
DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/Q8XA5.
近期的基因关联研究表明,维生素D受体(VDR)基因多态性与儿童1型糖尿病(T1DM)风险之间的关系存在相互矛盾的结果。本系统评价的目的是收集当前可用的证据,以评估VDR基因多态性与儿童T1DM风险之间的关系。
广泛检索万方数据、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国知网、重庆维普中文科技期刊数据库、PubMed、Embase和Web of Science等医学数据库,查找2021年6月之前发表的相关文献,重点关注VDR基因多态性与儿童T1DM风险之间的关系。由2名独立研究人员根据纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估偏倚风险。进行荟萃分析以量化VDR基因多态性与儿童T1DM风险之间的关系。
本荟萃分析的结果将提交给同行评审期刊发表。
通过本荟萃分析探讨VDR基因多态性与儿童T1DM风险之间的关系。
本研究无需伦理批准。该系统评价将发表在同行评审期刊上,在会议上展示,并在社交媒体平台上分享。
DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/Q8XA5。