Suppr超能文献

我们是否只见树木不见森林?温带落叶林中的同种种群负密度制约。

Are we missing the forest for the trees? Conspecific negative density dependence in a temperate deciduous forest.

机构信息

Department of Biology, Ecology and Biodiversity Working Group, Institute of Environmental Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Department of Biological Sciences, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Jul 15;16(7):e0245639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245639. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

One of the central goals of ecology is to determine the mechanisms that enable coexistence among species. Evidence is accruing that conspecific negative density dependence (CNDD), the process by which plant seedlings are unable to survive in the area surrounding adults of their same species, is a major contributor to tree species coexistence. However, for CNDD to maintain community-level diversity, three conditions must be met. First, CNDD must maintain diversity for the majority of the woody plant community (rather than merely specific groups). Second, the pattern of repelled recruitment must increase in with plant size. Third, CNDD should extend to the majority of plant life history strategies. These three conditions are rarely tested simultaneously. In this study, we simultaneously test all three conditions in a woody plant community in a North American temperate forest. We examined whether understory and canopy woody species across height categories and dispersal syndromes were overdispersed-a spatial pattern indicative of CNDD-using spatial point pattern analysis across life history stages and strategies. We found that there was a strong signal of overdispersal at the community level. Across the whole community, larger individuals were more overdispersed than smaller individuals. The overdispersion of large individuals, however, was driven by canopy trees. By contrast, understory woody species were not overdispersed as adults. This finding indicates that the focus on trees for the vast majority of CNDD studies may have biased the perception of the prevalence of CNDD as a dominant mechanism that maintains community-level diversity when, according to our data, CNDD may be restricted largely to trees.

摘要

生态学的核心目标之一是确定使物种共存的机制。越来越多的证据表明,同物种负密度制约(CNDD),即植物幼苗在同种成年植物周围无法存活的过程,是树种共存的主要原因。然而,为了使 CNDD 维持群落水平的多样性,必须满足三个条件。首先,CNDD 必须维持大多数木本植物群落的多样性(而不仅仅是特定的群体)。其次,排斥性繁殖的模式必须随植物大小而增加。第三,CNDD 应该扩展到大多数植物生活史策略。这三个条件很少同时得到检验。在这项研究中,我们在北美的一个温带森林的木本植物群落中同时检验了这三个条件。我们通过空间点格局分析检验了不同高度类别的林下和冠层木本物种以及不同扩散模式的物种在生活史阶段和策略上是否存在过分离现象——这是 CNDD 的空间模式。我们发现,在群落水平上存在着强烈的过分离信号。在整个群落中,较大的个体比较小的个体存在更强的过分离现象。然而,大个体的过分离现象是由树冠树木驱动的。相比之下,林下木本物种作为成体并不存在过分离现象。这一发现表明,根据我们的数据,由于 CNDD 可能主要局限于树木,因此,在绝大多数 CNDD 研究中都集中于树木,这可能会导致对 CNDD 作为维持群落水平多样性的主要机制的普遍性的认识存在偏差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/685a/8282035/eee85c9d39ee/pone.0245639.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验