Couillard Simon, Jackson David J, Wechsler Michael E, Pavord Ian D
Respiratory Medicine Unit and Oxford Respiratory NIHR BRC, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, England; Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Guy's Severe Asthma Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals, London, England; School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King's College London, England.
Chest. 2021 Dec;160(6):2019-2029. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.07.008. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
A 56-year-old man has difficult-to-control asthma and a history of four exacerbations in the prior 12 months despite high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and additional controller therapies. Is he suitable for more advanced therapeutic options? To address this query, we herein review the clinical assessment of a patient with suspected severe asthma and discuss factors contributing to poor asthma control and how biomarkers assist in disease investigation and stratification. The key components of our multidisciplinary approach are to confirm an asthma diagnosis and adherence to treatment, to assess any contributing comorbidities or confounding factors, and to stratify what type of asthma the patient has. The combination of spirometry and repeated measures of key biomarkers of type 2 airway inflammation-the blood eosinophil count and fractional exhaled nitric oxide-identifies whether poor disease control is driven by uncontrolled, ICS-resistant type 2 airway inflammation or ongoing airflow obstruction. A failure to elicit evidence of either suggests an alternative driver for the patient's symptoms, including chronic airway infection and non-asthma causes. Each phenotype represents a treatable trait that requires a specific targeted approach. Critically, steroids can cause harm, and their use should be guided by objective evidence of inflammation rather than symptoms alone. To conclude, after assessment of treatment adherence and exclusion of relevant comorbidities, the patient was found to have severe asthma with ICS-resistant type 2 airway inflammation. We will consider additional treatment options at our next appointment in part 2/2 of this How I Do It series.
一名56岁男性患有难以控制的哮喘,尽管使用了高剂量吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)及其他控制疗法,但在过去12个月内仍有4次病情加重。他是否适合更先进的治疗方案?为解答这一问题,我们在此回顾对疑似重度哮喘患者的临床评估,并讨论导致哮喘控制不佳的因素以及生物标志物如何辅助疾病调查和分层。我们多学科方法的关键组成部分是确认哮喘诊断及治疗依从性,评估任何相关的合并症或混杂因素,并对患者所患哮喘类型进行分层。肺活量测定与2型气道炎症关键生物标志物(血液嗜酸性粒细胞计数和呼出一氧化氮分数)的重复测量相结合,可确定疾病控制不佳是由未得到控制的、对ICS耐药的2型气道炎症还是持续性气流受限所致。若未能找到任何一种情况的证据,则提示患者症状存在其他驱动因素,包括慢性气道感染和非哮喘病因。每种表型都代表一种可治疗的特征,需要采用特定的靶向治疗方法。至关重要的是,类固醇可能会造成伤害,其使用应以炎症的客观证据而非仅以症状为指导。总之,在评估治疗依从性并排除相关合并症后,发现该患者患有重度哮喘且伴有对ICS耐药的2型气道炎症。在本“我的诊疗方法”系列的第2/2部分中,我们将在下次就诊时考虑其他治疗方案。