Chen Dongbo, Zha Xiaozhu, Ye Dongmei, Kang Mei, Zhu Liyang, Yang Mingwei, Chen Yu, Zhu Kechao, Xia Wanli, Wang Zhi, Wang Yichun
Department of Radiation Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Anqing Medical College, Anqing, China.
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Nov;10(22):1222. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-4577.
There is no strong evidence regarding the optimal treatment and specific prognosis prediction model for upper esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (UESCC). This study aimed to investigate the real-world treatment patterns and develop models to predict overall survival (OS) and esophageal cancer-specific survival (ECSS) in patients with stage I-III UESCC.
Patients with T1-4N0-3M0 UESCC in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were identified from 2010 to 2017, and randomized to a training cohort and a validation cohort. The effect of treatment patterns on survival were comprehensively analyzed. Nomograms were developed by incorporating independent prognostic factors analyzed by Cox regression in the training cohort and evaluated by the concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analyses (DCA) in two cohorts.
A total of 677 patients were identified, including 452 in the training cohort and 225 in the validation cohort. Among all populations, 71.9% (487) received chemoradiotherapy without surgery, and chemoradiotherapy or/and surgery showed better survival than other treatments. However, surgery was rarely carried out for patients with stage II-III. T stage, N stage, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy were independent risks for both OS and ECSS, while age was also an independent risk for OS. The C-indexes for nomograms to predict OS (0.71 and 0.72) and ECSS (0.70 and 0.73) were greater than 7th AJCC staging system to predict OS (0.61 and 0.64) and ECSS (0.64 and 0.64) in both the training cohort and the validation cohort. Time-dependent ROC curves and DCA also suggested that nomograms performed consistently better than 7th AJCC staging system. The calibration curves demonstrated good consistency in predicting survival.
Chemoradiotherapy was a major treatment with preferable survival for patients with stage I-III UESCC. We have firstly developed and validated prognostic nomograms in patients with stage I-III UESCC, which would play a supplementary role in the current staging system.
关于食管上段鳞状细胞癌(UESCC)的最佳治疗方法和特定预后预测模型,目前尚无有力证据。本研究旨在调查I - III期UESCC患者的真实世界治疗模式,并建立预测总生存期(OS)和食管癌特异性生存期(ECSS)的模型。
从监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中确定2010年至2017年期间T1 - 4N0 - 3M0的UESCC患者,并随机分为训练队列和验证队列。综合分析治疗模式对生存的影响。通过纳入训练队列中经Cox回归分析的独立预后因素来构建列线图,并在两个队列中通过一致性指数(C指数)、受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线、校准曲线和决策曲线分析(DCA)进行评估。
共确定677例患者,其中训练队列452例,验证队列225例。在所有患者中,71.9%(487例)接受了非手术放化疗,放化疗或/和手术治疗的患者生存率高于其他治疗方法。然而,II - III期患者很少进行手术。T分期、N分期、手术、化疗和放疗是OS和ECSS的独立危险因素,而年龄也是OS的独立危险因素。在训练队列和验证队列中,预测OS的列线图C指数(分别为0.71和0.72)和预测ECSS的列线图C指数(分别为0.70和0.73)均高于第7版美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期系统预测OS(分别为0.61和0.64)和ECSS(分别为0.64和0.64)的C指数。时间依赖性ROC曲线和DCA也表明列线图的表现始终优于第7版AJCC分期系统。校准曲线显示在预测生存方面具有良好的一致性。
放化疗是I - III期UESCC患者的主要治疗方法,生存率较好。我们首次在I - III期UESCC患者中开发并验证了预后列线图,这将在当前分期系统中发挥补充作用。